Preview

John Stuart Mill's Essay On Liberty

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1733 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Stuart Mill's Essay On Liberty
In John Stuart Mill’s Essay On Liberty, Mill makes many arguments regarding the liberty of thought. The overall argument of this essay is centered on the question of what kind of power the society should be allowed to exercise over an individual. Mill discusses specific examples such as, the oppression of public opinion, or expression of one’s individual opinion, and beliefs. He then goes on to discuss the argument of whether or not an individual should have the right to act on those opinions, and when authority has the right to limit someone’s over all individuality. It is important to understand that Mill was not trying to argue the freedom of people, but rather for the ability of people to think for themselves. Some of these arguments …show more content…
In Chapter two “Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion” Mill looks at the issue of if people, or society over all should have the power to limit someone else’s opinion, or if public opinion as a whole should be regulated by government. Mill does not feel that an individual’s opinions should be silenced in any case. Mill’s main belief in this essay is that society should only have the power to assert authority over an individual if their behavior is harming others, but outside of that it is intruding on individual freedom. On one hand Mill argues that public opinion can be more damaging to individuality and dissent then any laws that could be put in their place. Although he believes that individuals should have the freedom to express their opinions he does not see it fit that the majority opinion in a society or the public opinion be forced upon others. A clear example of this is when Mill states “If all mankind minus one were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.” Mill shows a clear distinction between expressing an opinion, and forcing your beliefs, and values upon others through the use of …show more content…
Mill also was able to devout a large amount of his time to express this topic in particular showing its importance. I also found that Mill uses very clear examples of previous examples of this, and of how this would be beneficial to both the society, and the individual, which is the point of his writing, to show people why they should support his idea of liberty. His writing was also able to support, and demonstrate his argument by showing how he could refute opposition to his idea. A strong argument must have this ability, and include the use of life examples that the audience can use to relate to, and properly see one’s point of view. Mill’s reasoning for individual freedom to opinion had all of these important characteristics, making it the strongest of the arguments he discusses in his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Stuart Mills believed very strongly in individual liberty and freedom. However I think that it is first important to state that Mills did not believe in unlimited liberty. He thought that this would lead to conflict, and therefore he believed that government was essential. He believed that the role of the government should be to protect citizens from such conflict, yet still allow for individual liberty and progress.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill, author of the chapter “Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion” in the philosophical work On Liberty, outlines four main arguments of why society is impacted by the silencing of others’ opinions. Wayne Fuller, author of the chapter “Diffusion of Knowledge” in the work The American Mail: Englarger of the Common Life,” presents ideas that Mill would be able to apply his ideas to.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, in his essay, civil disobedience, argues that when a person is not in comfort with the government, then we have a right as humans to act against its injustice. Thoreau supports his argument by first stating that unjust laws exist and that we shall endeavor to amend them instead of being content to obey them. His purpose is to inform the reader about the way they are being mistreated by government and to persuade them to act against their injustices in a civil disobedient way inn order to see the government acting up more rapidly and systematically. Thoreau establishes a critical and righteous tone for those who are against…

    • 2786 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Civil Disobedience,” Henry David Thoreau focuses his ideas around the central theme, “It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right.” He defines man as a person who listens and acts to his conscience and states that if man obeys laws opposing his conscience, such as laws created by legislators, then he is no better than an animal.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history philosophers have introduced new ideas and belief systems into society in hopes to better the world they lived in. Many philosophers have introduced ideas that are still in practice in American government. While popular belief among those trying to pave a path forward was that government, as it stood, was tyrannical and overly restrictive, however John Stuart Mill believed that through government happiness and freedom can be achieved.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    mary kay reference sheet

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages

    III. Preview Statement: In the modern society, one of the major social constrains to this particular issue has to do with liberty-I am going to discuss this…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The colonists that gave voice to the idea of independence were mostly muted, as dissenters were considered traitors to the crown, and many of them, upon being captured, were tortured and hanged. Paine published his pamphlet, “Common Sense,” in January of 1776, while working as an editor for the “Pennsylvania Magazine.” It was in this pamphlet that he was able to crystallize sentiment among the colonists, for independence from Britain. (Editors,…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience then? I think we should be men first, and subjects afterward (242).” Thoreau depicts the government turning its men into machines, using their bodies for its “greater good.” Through this mechanization, the system steals the right to individual life and personal experience. It is in the name of the government that we must pay give reverence and make our own way (247). Thoreau pushed for men to live as a “counter friction” to the machine (244). It was the idea that if two forces opposed each other with such force, they would eventually wear each other down, smoothing each other’s surfaces, making for compromise. Thoreau urges men not to let their minds be dulled by the “daily grind” of the machine, but to think for…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosopher John Locke once wrote that, “No man ...has a power to hand over their preservation...to the absolute will and arbitrary dominion of someone else”. He meant that the inviolable rights of a people are greater than the demands of a government and his words ring true today. In the modern era people can fight “arbitrary dominion” through democratic election, vocal condemnation, and most controversially civil disobedience. The practice of deliberate defiance has netted much criticism for its seeming disregard for a country’s rule of law. Yet, a free society is one in which people have the power to exercise their rights, and in choosing not to follow unjust laws, they only strengthen a country's institutions.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosopher, Henry David Thoreau in his speech, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience”, argues that people should not follow the majority and think for themselves if the government is unjust. He supports his claim by first appealing to christian values with religious diction, aphorisms to impact his intellectuals, and addressing a counter argument, Daniel Webster. Thoreau’s purpose is to inform christian citizens in america that they should not hesitate to defy a corrupt federal government that contradict their values.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill Shared Humanity

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill feels strongly about people being free to express their opinions. There are a few reasons Mill states of why it is so important to society and for shared humanity. First off it is healthy for the human mind individually. Shared humanity is about being there for others and being kind for no reason. So by listening and helping and individual feel great mentally, it shows that is important to shared humanity. If people were not to listen or deny people of their right to express their…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glory John-Kolawole Assignment 3 John Stuart Mill explores the ideas of liberty, social control, and individuality in his book "On Liberty". At first look, Mill appears to support ideas that are in opposition to one another; he opposes restrictive customs while yet supporting embracing diversity. Nevertheless, by examining liberty, the harm principle, and the inherent worth of individuality, Mill offers a persuasive picture of actual freedom. He promotes the notion that diversity and the rejection of repressive standards are linked. This essay evaluates Mill's philosophical framework by analyzing key passages from "On Liberty," including his opinions on liberty, the application of the harm principle, and the importance of individuality.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I understand that his liberty links individual and self-improvement freedom. Therefore, I think his liberal political theory from scientific method on utilitarianism theory. Furthermore, Mill's point of economic philosophy was one of free market depending on his liberalism theory. Mill promoted economic democracy instead of capitalism, a labour cooperate.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill’s essay shows how much he valued all people of society and his view that all people deserve equal freedom and rights. Women giving the chance to have equality would not relinquish their roles as wives and mothers besides a select few, but they would have the freedom to choose their lives and more of a sense of control over their own destinies. He believed that to have a happy and functional society there must be equality for all. He was an advocate for all who were oppressed in life.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberty is define as “The positive enjoyment of various social, political, or economic rights and privilege and the power of choice”-.Merriam-Webster. In early America, the British were not helping America grow for the better and not giving them any amount of liberty. Instead they were doing harm and angering the people. After every situation where there could have been a better solution and peace, turned to only angry and eventually war. In America, each colony stepped up with leaders to come together and fight for liberty. Fantastically, these leaders stepped up and stood their ground against Britain. They created a document called the Declaration of Independence and many more that would free America form an iron grip to changing America’s legacy for the better.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays