Preview

Issues and Intolerance of Sexual Minorities in Arizona

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1631 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Issues and Intolerance of Sexual Minorities in Arizona
ISSUES AND INTOLERANCE OF SEXUAL MINORITIES IN ARIZONA

Gays and lesbians are discriminated against and oppressed by archaic "sex laws" used by the conservative Arizona government. Some statutes include the restriction of same-sex marriage, and no monetary or federal benefits for domestic partners of homosexuals who work for a government agency. Section 38-656 of the Arizona Revised Statutes reads "A country, city, town, or other political subdivision of this state shall not offer health and accident coverage for domestic partners of its employees unless that coverage is approved by a vote of the people in that city, county, town, or other political subdivision… ‘domestic partners ' means any nonmarried cohabitating persons except parents and their children"(Arizona Revised Statutes). In other words, unmarried partners in dedicated homosexual as well as heterosexual relationships cannot receive the benefits and coverage that are now necessary for modern living. Both Maricopa and Pima counties voted to give benefits to domestic partners; the other 13 counties in Arizona are still using this law (www.hrc.org/issues/hate). HB 106, introduced by Republican Rep. Jeff Grocost, specified that marriage between two people of the same sex is "illegal", and refused to recognize lawful marriages performed in other states. Initially blocked by substitution of general "family values" language instead of anti-marriage stipulation, the bill was revived through manipulation of the rules and passed through the House of Representatives. The Senate passed the bill as SB1038, and was signed by Governor Symington on May 5th, 1996 (www.datalounge.com).

Other laws that have been formerly used for the purpose of anti-gay discrimination were 13-1411 and 13-1412, both of which were very recently repealed. 13-1411 was the "notorious crime against nature" law, which punished homosexual relations with a class 3 misdemeanor. In the notes following the statute, the state



Cited: www.12news.com Arizona Revised Statutes- annotated #5B; Section 13-1400 www.azleg.state.az.us www.datalounge.com www.hrc.org/issues/hate Mohr, Richard. Gays/Justice: a study of ethics, society, and law: 1988 "Morality." Funk & Wagnalls Standard Desk Dictionary. 1984 ed. www.victoryfund.org Wiederanders, Tim. "Editorial." Daily Courier 1 May 2001:2

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    DOMA Ruling Case Study

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DOMA caused the federal government to not recognize gay marriages. This meant gay and lesbian partners of federal employees did not receive federal health insurance,…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The author’s characterizations of the oppressive actions of the political-ruling white class towards the Chicano people can just as easily be applied to recent legislation crafted by several right-leaning politicians that serves only to strip LGBTQ individuals of their civil rights and to designate said persons as second class citizens. These statutes include the recently invalidated Proposition 8 here in California as well as the Federal Defense of Marriage Act, which would have forbidden gay couples from enjoying the same marriage benefits as heterosexual spouses, current state laws or constitutional amendments in 35 states that define marriage as being exclusively between a man and a woman, and current anti-sodomy laws aimed squarely at gay couples in 13 states that remain on the books despite such laws being outlawed by the US Supreme Court 10 years ago. Such anti-gay legislation is similar in prejudicial and persecutory scope as recent anti-immigration legislation enacted in Arizona and Alabama that seeks…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    19 states decided to allow same-sex couples the same benefits only offered to married couples…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Only in the early twentieth century did the ideal of the homosexual as a distinct, separate category of person emerge, and only in the twentieth century did the state begin to classify and penalize citizens on the basis of their identity or status as homosexuals. The States enacted discriminatory policies in the 1920s, but such measures and other forms of anti-gay harassment reached a peak in the twenty years following World War II, when government agencies systematically discriminated against homosexuals. [1]…

    • 1068 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1996, the Supreme Court enacted The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which the third section defined the words marriage and spouse to refer to the legal joining of a man and a woman. This would legally bar any same-sex couples from receiving legal…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    II.By listening to a brief history of the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy you will gain further knowledge of where we have come since the last 60 years…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exam review

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Defense of Marriage Act(DOMA): Act that denied federal recognition to same-sex couples and gave states the right to legally ignore gay or lesbian marriages should they gain legal recognition in Hawaii or any other state. Signed into law by President Bill Clinton.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout history, the state has tried to suppress and contain homosexuality. Even “as early as 1656, the New Haven Colony prescribed the death penalty for lesbians” (Rich 634). This shows how severe the punishment was if found to be in a non-heteronormative relationship. The article, “The Straight State” by Margot Canaday states, “There was a policy against being homosexual, and it was federal in nature. States and localities generally policed homosexual acts, but […] it was the federal government that gradually developed the tools to target homosexual personhood or status, the condition of being a homosexual” (Canaday 6). Demonstrating how homosexuality was regulated and controlled, the state constructed the condition of being a homosexual. After creating this construct using characteristics, the state used it to oppress and discriminate those who were considered homosexual. The article continues, stating, “Those suspected of homosexuality were purged from the civil service and military in astounding numbers at midcentury. They were also barred from certain federal benefits, faced increased FBI and Post Office surveillance and explicit immigration and naturalization exclusions, as well as the stain of alleged political subversion” (Canaday 2). As homosexuality was considered to be an unnatural…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    For years gay and lesbian organizations have always had a hard fight for equal rights in the United States, Texas is without an exception. Recent law amendments to the state constitution have upturned the “Anti-sodomy statute, Chapter 21, Sec. 21.06 of the Texas Penal Code made it Class C misdemeanor to engage in deviant sexual intercourse with the same sex” and brought the State back in line with the Supreme Court Ruling equal rights for everyone. The current problem now facing Texas is about repealing the outdated state amendments and Texas Health Code to reflect the changes and helping government employees stay informed of those changes.…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marriage and civil partnership – denying benefits that would apply for married couples to same sex couples who have entered a civil partnership…

    • 8577 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States of America, through its core democratic values, is greatly divided on civil rights issues because of the weight of consideration given to all who can voice their opinions. This gives rise to many topics of strong debate, delaying progressive action due to liberties granted by the Bill of Rights, and implications of impeding civil rights discrepancies. Currently there is a major debate in the white house, concerning the legal rights of gay people, mainly their right to have a marital status recognized by all levels of government. In 1996, there was an act, Defence of Marriage Act (DOMA), that was approved that made clear what the definition was of the words “marriage” and “spouse”. This definition was: “In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ‘marriage’ means only a…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are approximately nine million people in America that represent the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT) community. That represents 3.5% of the American population, with that number expected to rise as new legislation makes it safer and more acceptable for the LGBT community to identify themselves (Williams Institute, 2011). The purpose of this paper is to discuss current legislation in the Federal government pertaining to LGBT rights, as well as cover the history of LGBT legislation. The American Government has come a long way with gay rights, but there is still…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Montaldo, C. (2004, October 25). Hate Crime Laws and Sexual Orientation. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from About.com Crime/Punishment: http://www.crime.about.com…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against DOMA

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1993, Hawaii state government ruled that prohibiting same-sex marriage violated equal protections defined by the Hawaii Constitution (Pelts, 2014). In response, Rob Barr introduced DOMA to nationally define marriage as a union between a man and a woman on May 7, 1996. In September 1996, DOMA became federally recognized by President Bill Clinton after undergoing voting from the House and Senate. Under DOMA, marriage is defined as a “union between one man and one woman as husband and wife and spouse of the opposite sex” (Pelts, 2014, p.238). In addition to the federal definition of marriage, DOMA also allows individual states to invalidate same-sex marriages performed in other states (Koppelman, 1997). In 2011,…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Same Sex Marriage Texas

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Studies show gay same sex employees are happier and perform better as workers when they feel supported. Evidence suggests governments can benefit from creating a work atmosphere in which same sex people feel they are supported as their heterosexual counterparts. Private corporations are starting to offer same sex benefits more and more. Even when the government does not offer the benefits one may still acquire them. First the employer can decide to offer benefits, second to include antidiscrimination laws imposed by subnational and national governments with jurisdiction over the employer. There is a lot of public support for offering same sex benefits in the Western countries, and the financial cost of is low. The decision to offer same sex benefits is made by a state or local legislative body. There are some obstacles in the United States, the federal Defense of Marriage Act clarifies that the word “spouse” in federal laws, refers only to a person of the opposite sex, again this is the Federal government not the States.(Astray-Caneda,…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays