Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Intention in Criminal Law

Satisfactory Essays
375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Intention in Criminal Law
Explain the term “intention” as the mens rea of a crime using decided cases to support your explanation.
The Latin word mens rea, when translated means ‘guilty mind’ is defined in the Black’s Law Dictionary as “the state of mind that the prosecution, to secure a conviction, must prove that a defendant had when committing a crime.” Intention is ‘the purpose or design with which an act is done. It is the foreknowledge of the act, coupled with the desire of it, such foreknowledge and desire being the cause of the act, inasmuch as they fulfil themselves through the operation of the will. An act is intentional if, and in so far as, it exists in idea before it exists in fact, the idea realising itself in the fact because of the desire by which it is accompanied.” This paper will seek to explain the term “intention” as the mens rea of a crime by using literature and case laws.
The criminal law directs that before an accused can be convicted of a criminal offence the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the actus reus (guilty act) coincided in law time with mens rea (guilty mind).
There are only two state of mind which constitutes mens rea, and they are intention, and recklessness. Intention is regarded as the most culpable state of mind for many heinous criminal offences such as murder. Intention as the mens rea of a crime can either be direct intention (purpose intent) or indirect or oblique intention (foresight intent).
Where an accused intended a particular outcome of the unlawful voluntary act the mens reas was one of direct intent. On the other hand where an accused engaged in a dangerous act but claims that his primary purpose was to achieve something other than to kill or harm the mens rea is said to be one of indirect or oblique intention. For example, if an accused planted a bomb on an aeroplane knowing that it will explode and the passengers would die but does not seem to care as long as he obtains his objective to destroy the plane then he would have direct intention of mens rea to commit the crime because the consequences of the action were desired

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Farmer V Pilot

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The concept of 'intention' does not require that Defendant (D) know that his/her act will cause harm to the Plaintiff (P), but must know with substantial certainty that their act will result in certain outcomes (landing of the plane on the P’s land).…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Regina Knight Case

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order for a trial to be brought, the police and prosecutors might be able to prove that the elements of the particular offence are present. In this criminal case both Actus reus, Mens rea as well causation was clearly shown through the behavior of Katherine Knight.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Review for Exam 3

    • 941 Words
    • 5 Pages

    9. The term actus reus is often used to describe a criminal act or mind?…

    • 941 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Unit 03 Aqa

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages

    * Morrissons (1989): level of intention is lower when the defendant is trying to resist/prevent an arrest/detention…

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mens rea comes from Edward Coke writings. He said that while someone may have committed a criminal act they can only be found guilty if it was deliberate. You mentioned that an act cannot be criminal unless there is guilt and I agree with that statement. To be found guilty of wrong doing a criminal prosecutor must show beyond a reasonable doubt that they knowingly participated in a crime that harmed someone else of damaged property.…

    • 76 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 6 outline

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    c. Specific intent- the thoughtful and conscious intention to perform a specific act in order to achieve a particular crime…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    HSC PREP

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages

    The accused intended to commit the crime, knowing their actions were wrong (guilty mind). Three types of mens rea:…

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some crimes are only committed intentionally so must distinguish from recklessness e.g. GBH * Direct intent – It was D’s purpose/aim/objective to bring about the AR. - Duff = test of failure – would D intend their actions to be a failure * Oblique intent – The AR was a necessary by-product of D committing his offence, although it was not his purpose. * Intent is a subjective concept and must be judged according to what D wanted to happen or foresaw happening (s.8 Criminal Justice Act 1967 = lays down evidential rule as to how intention is to be proved and…

    • 2945 Words
    • 85 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We must look to the outward expression of a person as manifesting his intention rather than to his secret and unexpressed intention. ‘The law imputes to a person an intention corresponding to the reasonable meaning of his words and acts.'” Lucy, 196 Va. at 521.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    criminal justice

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Intent is when a individual has sufficient mens rea ( mental state) to commit a crime with a aim or purpose. Intent is the state of ones mind at the time then followed by action.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To secure a conviction, the prosecution side must prove that the defendant committed the crime while in a certain state of mind. The definition is specified of every crime before a person can be convicted as a prerequisite for Mens Rea. There are three states of mind which constitute the necessary Mens Rea for a criminal offence. These are intention, recklessness and negligence and are described below. [3]…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HSC Legal Studies

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mens rea: refers to the mental state of the accused; i.e. that the accused intended the actions.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    drowning girl

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Should a person’s intentions matter in deciding if he or she committed a crime? For example, should it matter if an act was done on purpose? If it was done when a person was being reckless? If it was done when a person was enraged?…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. Mere intentions do not make a criminal offence – there must be a criminal act or omission…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Actus Reus

    • 2024 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Actus Reus  The physical element of a crime: o An act o An omission (failure to act) o A ‘state of affairs’ Conduct, consequence, circumstances. To complete an offence, mens rea is also needed. Strict liability offences do not require mens rea. A ‘state of affairs’ is an involuntary act: o Larsonneur 1933- D ordered to leave UK; brought back to UK against her will but Irish police. Convicted, despite involuntary act. Actus reus must be proved: o R v Deller 1916- D thought he’d mortgaged car, and so was lying to buyer. Car not mortgaged- mens rea for false pretence but no actus reus. Conduct generally must be voluntary to constitute actus reus. Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea: o Thabo Meli v R 1954- Ds plied V with drink; hit him intending to kill. Pushed V off cliff, where he died from exposure. Privy Council held that entire event was one continuing actus reus. o R v Le Brun 1991- D hit wife intending to injure. Her death actually resulted from D dragging her from the car, where she hit her head on the ground. Manslaughter conviction- two acts part of same sequence despite time gap. o R v Church 1966- D fought V; knocked her unconscious. Assumed she was dead and threw her into river where she drowned. Manslaughter. Omissions Normally, only voluntary acts can constitute actus reus. However, a ‘state of affairs’ can be sufficient for actus reus. Omissions- failing to act. There is only criminal liability for the failure if there was a duty to act; the crime must also be a result crime (e.g. murder). Six different duties. A statutory duty: an act of Parliament can create liability for an omission, e.g. failing to report a road traffic accident. Examples include s.1 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933, the Domestic Violence, Crime, and Victims Act 2004 and the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991: o Greener v DPP 1996- D guilty under Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 for failing to take precautions when restraining a dog that escape and bit a child. Common Law Duties: A…

    • 2024 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics