Products

About

©2018 StudyMode.com

Indian Removal Act

Topics: U.S. state, United States, Native Americans in the United States Pages: 2 (796 words) Published: October 8, 1999
Indian Removal (Zinn Chapter 7)

Once the white men decided that they wanted lands belonging to the Native Americans (Indians), the United States Government did everything in its power to help the white men acquire Indian land. The US Government did everything from turning a blind eye to passing legislature requiring the Indians to give up their land (see Indian Removal Bill of 1828). Aided by his bias against the Indians, General Jackson set the Indian removal into effect in the war of 1812 when he battled the great Tecumseh and conquered him. Then General, later to become President, Jackson began the later Indian Removal movement when he conquered Tecumseh¹s allied Indian nation and began distributing their lands (of which he invested heavily in). Jackson became the leader of the distribution of Indian lands and distributed them in unequal ways. In 1828 when Jackson was running for President his platform was based upon Indian Removal, a popular issue which was working its way through Congress in the form of a Bill. Jackson won a sweeping victory and began to formulate his strategies which he would use in an "Indian Removal campaign". In 1829, upon seeing that his beloved Bill was not being enforced Jackson began dealing with the Indian tribes and offering them "untouchable" tracts of lands west of the Mississippi River if they would only cede their lands to the US and move themselves there. Jackson was a large fan of states rights-ism, hence he vetoed the charter for the Bank of the United States, and when faced with two issues concerning states rights (one with South Carolina regarding succession, one with Georgia regarding the Indians) he went with the suppression of South Carolina and gave Georgia all out support. When faced with the decision of Union or Indians he went with the Union and oppressed the Indians. The Executive branch wasn¹t the only part of government which suppressed the Indians, the...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Did Andrew Jackson's Removal Act Benefit the Indians? Essay

    ...that Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Act benefits the Native Americans. Andrew Jackson made notice of the issue with the Indians in his inaugural speech on March 4, 1829. He declared that he wanted to give humane and considerable attention to the Indian’s rights and wants in respect to the government and people. Jackson knew that meant to get rid of all remaining tribes beyond the Mississippi River. He (Jackson) believed that the Indians would be better off in the west; without the influence from the white man or local authority. Jackson hired two Tennessee generals to go visit the Creeks and Cherokees to see if the Indians would leave voluntarily. In that, those who did not leave would be protected by the federalgovernment. But he implies that if they refuse to move, their race would most likely be destroyed. Jackson became very concerned about the Native Americans. He was well liked by many chiefs due to his worrying for their welfare. He even took an orphaned Indian and raised him. Jackson was sure that as soon as the Indians adopted the white man’s’ habits, they would become complete citizens. But Jackson felt that since the white man wanted Indian territory and the two races could not cooperate, it would be best for the existence of Indians if they were removed. Jackson was concerned about...

    Read More
    1681 Words 5 Pages
  • Indian Removal DBQ Google Docs Essay

    ...Moss 1 Braden Moss Mr. Boyd 10/27/14 1st Period Indian Removal DBQ Ever since the American people arrived at the New World they have continually driven the Native Americans out of their native lands. The decision of the Jackson administration to remove the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River in the 1830s was not the only viable decision Jackson had in view of the issues, but Jackson had many reasons why he thought the decision was valid even though the Supreme Court said it was illegal in 1832. Andrew Jackson wanted to protect the indians from harm by relocating them in an area farther away from the United States. In Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America, he states that the United States were, “ sincerely desirous of saving the remnant of the natives, and of maintaining them in the free possession of that territory which the Union has guaranteed to them.” Like Jackson most of the states wanted to save the last of the natives. On the other hand, there were some that thought that they were barbaric and a threat to the states. So, the government had to side with the opposing states to exterminate some of the barbaric tribes [Document A]. Jackson wanted to protect the Cherokees from being exterminated so he started trying to convince them to relocate farther away. Lewis Cass agreed with Jackson and Alexis saying that the Cherokees were, “A barbarous people, depending for subsistence upon the...

    Read More
    719 Words 3 Pages
  • Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal (1980 Dbq) Essay

    ...Tyler Pape P. 3 APUSH Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal (1980 DBQ) Andrew Jackson’s presidency from 1829 to 1837 the decision to remove the Cherokee Indians to land west of the Mississippi River was made. This was more a change of the national policy rather than a reformulation of it. Since the Spanish came to the New World in the 1500’s, the Natives, were there. Starting with Washington’s administration in the 1790’s, the United States’ policy was to civilize the Natives and assimilate them into society. Under the administration of Andrew Jackson, who was in favor of Western speculation, the Natives were forced to move from their homeland. From the beginning of the United States, Native Americans were given rights to act as independent nations, and those rights were to be respected by following the Constitution. For example, Henry Knox, the Secretary of War in 1789, wrote to President George Washington, “The Indians, being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil. It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a just war,” (Document B). Because of this, the US allowed the Natives on American land their independent nations as they were the “prior occupants,” and their land should’ve never be taken unless they agreed to it or they were to lose it in a war. Although the United States’ policy sounded fair, for many years, the Natives were...

    Read More
    893 Words 3 Pages
  • Andrew Jackson and the Removal of the Native Americans Essay

    ...J Fircha Honors US History I 2 March 2012 Removal of Indians DBQ All presidents have a legacy; some good, some bad. Andrew Jackson’s legacy is the Indian Removal Act. This act was not supported by the Supreme Court, made Native Americans leave the places that they called home for countless years, and had a huge impact on Native Americans personally. In 1830, with consent and encouragement from President Andrew Jackson, many Indians were wrongly forced off of their native lands and onto foreign ones. To begin with, it was not the entire government that thought Native Americans should be relocated. In Worcester v. Georgia, a case where a Cherokee tribe appealed to the Supreme Court, the ruling was, in fact, in favor of the Cherokee Indians. Chief Justice John Marshall, in the majority opinion of the Court, wrote “The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community, occupying its own territory, with boundaries accurately described, in which the laws of Georgia can have no force.” He clearly stated that the Cherokee Indians have a right to their own land, are completely separate from the state of Georgia, and the whole problem is a both national and state issue, not just a national one. However, Andrew Jackson did not feel the same way. Instead of enforcing the Supreme Court’s decision, Andrew Jackson refused to recognize the Cherokees...

    Read More
    657 Words 2 Pages
  • Essay on The Cherokee Indians

    ...The Cherokee Indians The American Indian History in the Eastern part of the country is always associated with the Cherokee Indian nation. The Cherokee's were by far the largest and most advanced of the tribes when Europeans first arrived and came in contact with Native Americans. There are too many tribes to go over background on every one of them, so I'm going to focus on the Cherokee's since many of their ways and customs are so similar to all the other tribes in the East. When Europeans first arrived in North America, the Cherokees occupied a large expanse of territory in the Southeast. Their homeland included mountains and valleys in the southern part of the Appalachian Mountain chain. Their territory stretched from North Carolina to Virginia to Tennessee, South Carolina and Alabama. They spoke a dialect of Iroquoian language and their ancestral relatives (the Iroquois) occupied much of the Northeast cultural area. The name Cherokee was probably given to them by outsiders since the word Cherokee means, "people of different speech." The name the Cherokee's had for themselves was Ani-yun-wiya which means, "real people." Villages were placed along rivers and streams so they could take advantage of the rich black soil for farming. Corn was their main source of food, along with wild plants and roots that were common to their homeland. They used spears, traps, and fishing lines with hooks to catch many different kinds...

    Read More
    984 Words 3 Pages
  • The Cherokee Removal Essay

    ...The Cherokee Removal With the establishment and the settling of the new formed United States, white settlers were consistently encroaching on Indian lands. In order to keep the peace between the settlers and the native tribes, the United States adopted treaties protecting Indian lands from squatters. Presidents such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson believed the Indians could be “civilized” by adopting farming and giving up their nomad existence. The Cherokee proved that they could easily become civilized, yet there were those who still demanded their removal from their ancestry lands. If it were not for the inauguration of President Andrew Jackson and the passing of the Indian Removal Act of 1830, the Cherokee people could have easily integrated into American society. The Cherokee people incorporated many of the Anglo-American ways in order to become civilized and assimilate into American society. They converted from a hunter and gathering society into an agrarian society by clearing parcels of land for farming. Farming became their primary means of food. John Ridge, a prominent Cherokee, stated, “…there is not to my knowledge a solitary Cherokee to be found that depends upon the chase for subsistence and every head of a family has his house & farm” (Trail of Tears). A few of the wealthier Cherokee, usually half-breeds, owned larger tracks of land....

    Read More
    1468 Words 4 Pages
  • Essay about Treatment of American Indians

    ...American Indians were treated poorly by the white people they came in contact with. Not only did the whites discriminate against the Indians, they took their land, children, and made false interpretations about the way they lived. The whites had no idea about the indians ways of life and should not have been mocking them. All of these instances and many more made the Indians feel belittled and irrelevant in the eyes of other people. In eighteen thirty President Andrew Jackson along with the rest of the United States government designed the Indian Removal Act that would remove the indians from their lands. While this treaty did not force the indians to move off their land, it allowed the president to negotiate with the indians and make them relocate. In September of eighteen thirty the first Native American tribe to voluntarily sign the removal treaty was the Choctaws. Although the government kept there promise of relocating the indians to a different section of land, they often abused their right. When relocating, the government would choose lands that were not suitable for the indians needs like hunting, fishing and growing crops. The government knew what they were doing and they succeeded in their plan. When the indians could not grow their crops or hunt for their food they...

    Read More
    798 Words 3 Pages
  • Indian Removal Act Essay

    ...In regards to the proposal of the Indian Removal Act of 1835, Secretary of War William Crawford stated that, "Intrusions upon the lands of the friendly Indian tribes, is not only a violation of the laws, but in direct opposition to the policy of the government towards its savage neighbors." Only, this was not the first time the people were stealing land from the natives. It had been happening essentially since the first settlers came here, time and time again, until the entire east coast of the New World was occupied by whites on the Indian's land. There had even been numerous treaties signed by white and Indian men alike, but were almost always encroached upon by the white settlers and their greed of the land. In the time period between 1789 and the mid-1830's, there were political, constitutional, and practical concerns that formed on America's national Indian policy. For the settlers, these concerns were only considered problems in the later part of this period, and were just small complications in the beginning. The Indian removal act was nothing new. It was the same old policy towards the Cherokee Indians that had been around since the first settlers began taking their lands. In 1721, the Colonies and the Indian Confederation had signed a treaty, handing over half of the Cherokee land, and was supposed to stop...

    Read More
    852 Words 3 Pages

Popular Essays

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free