Preview

How Does Hirschi's Contradictions Have Indicated Crime

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
182 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Hirschi's Contradictions Have Indicated Crime
Hirschi’s contradictions on life course theories have indicated crime is neither constant nor relative. Brannigan (1997) found “Gottfredson and Hirschi together identified the element of low self-control as a critical condition for individual choices associated with delinquency”. Brannigan (1997) explains low-self control is directly due to lack in parental supervision especially in the first eight years of life of a child in addition to inconsistent parental discipline.
Though Laub and Sampson were students of control theory they do not follow Hirschi’s position faithfully (Brannigan, 405, 1997). The basic theory in light of criticism and contradictory research is often referred to as a “general” claim because most “approaches to crime ignores

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Control Theory

    • 15254 Words
    • 62 Pages

    ravis Hirschi has dominated control theory for four decades. His influence today is undiminished and likely will continue for years, if not decades, to come (see, e.g., Britt & Gottfredson, 2003; Gottfredson, 2006; Kempf, 1993; Pratt & Cullen, 2000). Beyond the sheer scholarly talent manifested in his writings, what accounts for Hirschi’s enduring influence on criminological theory? Three interrelated considerations appear to nourish the appeal of his thinking. First, Hirschi’s theories are stated parsimoniously. This means that his theory’s core propositions are easily understood (e.g., the lack of social bonds or of self-control increases criminal involvement). Second, Hirschi is combative and thus controversial. He stakes out a theoretical position and then argues that alternative perspectives are wrong. Hirschi (1983) has long been antagonistic to attempts to integrate theories. Good theories, he believes, have assumptions and an internal consistency that make them incompatible with other approaches. Attempts to mix them together result in fuzzy conceptual frameworks and inhibit the growth of the individual theories. Third, because Hirschi’s theories are parsimoniously stated and make claims that other theories are wrong, they are ideal to test empirically. One (but not the only) reason that theories flourish is that they are able to provide scholars with opportunities to conduct research and gain publications—the very accomplishment that allows for tenure…

    • 15254 Words
    • 62 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Developed by Michael Gottfredson and Travis Hirschi, the General Theory of Crime, better known as the Self-Control theory, is based on the lack of an individual’s self-control, which is the main factor behind criminal behavior or conformity. Self-control theory predominately highlights parental upbringing which suggests that individuals who were inadequately parented before the age of eight develop less self-control than persons of roughly the same age who had better parenting, even though others play a significant role in the process of proper or improper…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Social Controls

    • 2967 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This essay will thoroughly examine and evaluate the claim that it is social controls that prevent us from committing crimes by looking at different social control theories. Firstly we must determine what a social control theory consists of, according to Hopkins (2009) ‘social control theory is fundamentally derived from a conception of human nature that proposes that there are no natural limits on elementary human needs and desires. People will always want and seek further economic reward and it is thus not necessary to look for special motives for engaging in criminal activity. Human beings are born free to break the law and will only refrain from doing so under particular circumstances. It is these fundamental assumptions that form the basis of social control theories’ (Hopkins 2009, p.246). Therefore controls set in society are the reason humans do not commit crime, if these controls were to be removed humans would naturally due to their nature commit crime. This also shows that social control theories try and solve the question of ‘why do people not commit crime?’ rather than ‘what causes people to commit crime?’ The reason behind solving the first question rather than the second is because social control theorists believe committing crime is the default position of every human therefore the second question has already been solved.…

    • 2967 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Strain Theory

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unlike strain and social learning theorists, control theorists take crime for granted. They argue that all people have needs and desires that are more easily satisfied through crime than through legal channels.Crime in their eyes requires no special explanation: it is often the most expedient way to get what one wants. Rather than explaining why people engage in crime, we need to explain why they do not.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hirschi argues that crime is opportunistic and anyone would commit crime if the situation was right and there was little chance of being caught. He says that sociologists should not focus on whypeople commit crime but why more people do not. He maintains that most people are rational in their choices and that there are controls that operate to make most people keep their actions within the bounds of the law. They are, Attachment- commitment to family relationships which could be threatened by criminal acts, Commitment- years of education, building a career, buying a home and aquiring a good reputation, all this could be lost by commiting crime, Involvement- some people are activley involved in community life as volunteers, parentgovernors for schools etc. all this would be jepordized by criminal behaviour.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cjus 230 Final Paper

    • 4022 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The changes in family values and structure in the United States has helped contribute to juvenile delinquency today. Society needs to recognize problems within the home before trying to find solutions to problems for todays at risk youth in America. Major structural changes inside of the home could adversely affect the raising of juveniles leading to delinquency. Some of the issues I will discuss in my paper are divorce, child abuse, mothers working outside of the home, and single-parent homes. Ineffectively raising a child can cause low self-control and low self-esteem while increasing the risks of delinquency as well. I will argue that with proper supervision, counseling, and monitoring of the behavior of the juvenile, it is possible that society can help eliminate some of the crimes committed by juvenile delinquents.…

    • 4022 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Problem Behavior Syndrome

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The life course view is that criminality may be best understood as one of many social problems faced by at-risk youth, referred to as problem behavior syndrome (PBS). In this view, crime is one among a group of interrelated antisocial behaviors that cluster together and typically involve family dysfunction, sexual and physical abuse, substance abuse, smoking, precocious sexuality and early pregnancy, educational underachievement, suicide attempts, sensation seeking, and unemployment. People who suffer from one of these conditions typically exhibit many symptoms of the rest. All varieties of criminal behavior, including violence, theft, and drug offences, may be part of a generalized PBS, indicating that all forms of antisocial behavior have similar developmental patterns. (Siegel, p. 228)…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gottfredson and Hirschi’s low self-control theory states that children who have low self-control are more likely to develop criminal behavior and commit crimes in the future. These children who have low levels of self-control are very impulsive and only think about what they want at that moment no matter the consequences. By not thinking about what consequences may result from their actions, it is very simple to conclude that their levels of low self-control can…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Control balance theory explains that humans need an exact balance of power in their personal and social life to live on without deviance. Too little control, and one might over compensate to balance themselves. This is where the sexual offenders fit into place. But, control balance theory also discusses if there is too much control in a person’s life. If there is too much control, one takes advantage of the situation or tries to gain more power to further their state. In juveniles, control can be taken from parents, teachers, or even peers. All of this deficit leads to deviance. This deviance can continue into their adult life if they are a life-course persistent offender. My position supports the idea that lack or excess of control leads to crime, and this study brings value to my…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The crime control model reflects conservative values, while the due process model reflects liberal values. Crime control consists of the processing of defendant, the sentencing and punishment. Managing those who are incarcerated. This model emphasizes efficiency and is based on the view that the most important function of the criminal process is repression of criminal conduct. The due process model stresses the possibility of error in the stages leading to trail. It emphasizes the need to protect procedural rights even if this prevents the legal system from operating with maximum efficiency. Control theories in criminology are all about social control. Only those called containment or low-self-control theories have to do with individual psychology. Control theory has pretty much dominated the criminological landscape since 1969. It focuses upon a person's relationships to their agents of socialization, such as parents, teachers, preachers, coaches, scout leaders, or police officers. It studies how effective bonding with such authority figures translates into bonding with society, hence keeping people out of trouble with the law. Radical theories, also from the 1960s and 1970s, typically involve Marxist (referring to Karl Marx 1818-1883) critiques of capitalist society which allows things to exist like millions of billionaires and millionaires while the vast majority of people live in poverty or just get by. Such fundamental economic disparities reflect basic contradictions in the way work is organized into demoralizing, brutalizing, and oppressive conditions. Crime is seen as a reflection of class struggle, a kind of primitive rebellion with criminals behaving as rebels without a clue. Only through praxis (informed action based on theoretical understanding) will the new socialist society be formed and crime will go away. Psychological criminology has been around since 1914, and attempts to explain the consistent finding that there is an eight-point IQ…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gottfredson and Hirschi asked the question, “What is Crime?” and thus began to research the theories associated with crime and what drives people to commit criminal acts. Nearly all crimes, they concluded, are mundane, simple, trivial, easy acts aimed at satisfying desires of the moment. (Schmalleger, 2009) For example, a young child steals a candy bar from the local convenience store, simply because he wants the candy bar; this is not a violent or large- scale criminal act, but is still a violation of the law. The general theory of crime asserts that the operation of a single mechanism low self- control, accounts for “all crime, at all times”; including acts ranging from vandalism to homicide, from rape to white- collar crime. A person’s likelihood to engage in criminal activity or not can supposedly be explained through low self-control, the same way high self-control explains an individual 's tendencies of conforming to social norms and laws. (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990) Thus, some people have a lasting tendency to ignore the long term consequences of their behavior. These people tend to be impulsive, reckless, and self- centered. Crime is the end result of their tendencies.(Schmalleger, 2009)…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime Research Proposal

    • 3536 Words
    • 15 Pages

    References: Gibbs, J.J., Gever, D., Martin, J.S. (1998). Parental Management and Self control: an empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 40-71. Gottfredson, M. and Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Hanson, K.R., Bussiere, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: a meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-62. Longshore, D. (1998). Self control and criminal opportunity: a prospective test of the general theory of crime. Social Problems, 45, 102-13. Pratt, T.C., Cullen, F.T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: a meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-64. Ward, T., Hudson, S.M. (1998). A model of the relapse process in sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 700-25.…

    • 3536 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the idea of control theories, an individual who has for some reason or another cut ties with the “conventional order” so that he or she is now free to commit any criminal or deviant acts (Cullen & Agnew, 2011 P216). Travis Hirschi, in 1969, created the Social Bond Theory of crime, aka Social Control theory; two decades later he joined Michael Gottfredson to create the Self-Control Theory. It seems that, over time, Hirschi’s view on crime had changed, and “that his late[r] work was a marked departure from his earlier theorizing” (Cullen & Agnew, 2011 P202-203).…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Delinquent Career

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Key concepts of self-control theory are that about the lack of self-control as the main factor behind criminal behavior. (Hirschi and Gottfredson, 1990) The self-control theory of crime suggests that individuals who were ineffectually parented before the age of eight develop less self-control than individuals of approximately the same age who were raised with better parenting. Research has also found that low levels of self-control are correlated with criminal and impulsive conduct. (Hirschi and Gottfredson, 1990) Both theorists came out with a book titled “A General Theory of Crime” that tells us that crime is an act force or fraud in pursuit of self-interest. (Hirschi and Gottfredson, 1990). They also state in the development of self control these factors also determine how the child will be effected: school influence and parental supervision. If the school is watching over the child successfully, the child will turn out good and parental supervision will prevent future criminal activity as well because you can discipline the child when they are in the act because you are around…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The crime control model, as stated earlier, follows a more aggressive ideal as it seems to accuse first and ask questions later. Crime control uses a more informal approach to its investigation as it tends to research for answers outside the courtroom (Packer, 15). The advantage of this is the feeling of some form of action being taken whether right or wrong. Another side, both positive and negative is that if the person caught is the true offender then the element has been removed from society. On the negative side of this is if it is indeed the wrong person then a lot of…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays