Kristen M. Gentile
Ancient Medicine CLAS303
17 April 2011
And Its Contribution to Hippocratic Medicine
The Iliad and the Odyssey are traditionally seen as works of literature, but students and
researchers of ancient medicine and the classics see beyond that label. These Homeric ἔπος 
which were referred to as ἐπικός, were much more than just stories in the ancient world. In
fact, studies show that the medical descriptions featured in Homeric literature provided pre—
Hippocratic medicinal knowledge. While both the Iliad and the Odyssey are good evidence of
Homeric medicine, the Iliad provides plentiful information regarding not only the treatment and
descriptions of illnesses, but battle wounds as well. While Homer's Iliad documents the horrors
of war and the mortality of humans, there is an underlying benefit hiding between the lines.
There is a strong probability that the ancient world looked to the works of Homer as resources
for ancient medicine. The inclusion of the bloody descriptions of the injuries which occurred
during the final stages of the Trojan War is what provided pre—Hippocratic medicinal
knowledge and instigated curiosity for further anatomical and physiological exploration. In this
paper, I will examine how the knowledge of literary ailments helped the people of the ancient
world to better understand the human body and provided a smoother transition into the realm of
rational Hippocratic medicine.
The Iliad is like a guide to pre—Hippocratic medicine and the treatment of wounds. Of
Homer's epics, the Iliad contains the most information regarding the treatment of injuries.
Extensive in length, this ἔπος spans over 15,000 lines, and has countless different editions and
versions available today. The original Iliad was Considered one of the oldest surviving Greek
poems, but more importantly, it is believed to be one of the earliest literary sources of ancient
medicine, thought to be composed around 750 B.C.
What makes the Iliad a perfect source for this study as opposed to other ancient epics,
such as the Odyssey, or the works of Hesiod, is that it provided the people of the Bronze Age
in—depth information about early anatomy and physiology prior to medical discoveries or
studies and the Hippocratic Corpus. Throughout the poem, Homer uses detailed, gory
descriptions of the battle wounds. These descriptions provided people of the ancient world
medicinal, anatomical, and physiological knowledge through the imagery. The descriptions of
these wounds are so detailed that most of the major abdominal organs and innards are observed.
In the Iliad, Homer mentions one hundred and forty—seven different injuries, most of
which are described with surprising anatomical accuracy for the given era. Hermann Frölich, a
German surgeon constructed a table that summarized all of the wounds mentioned in the Iliad
while studying medicine on the Homeric Battlefield. The table is organized by anatomical
location, the type of weapon used, whether the wound was fatal or non—fatal, and how many
of each wound there was. By studying Frölich's Table of Homeric Wounds, ancient medicine students can conclude which wounds were fatal and which were non—fatal, and also should try
to approach the information from the perspective of an aspiring ancient ἰατρός. The fatality
rate, depending on the type and location of the wound, helped the people of the ancient world
understand what would happen after someone was wounded in say, his neck. It was important to
know if it was fatal, if that fatality was preventable, or if it was curable with roots, salves, and
or a process of medical treatments.
According to the Table, there were a total of thirty--one head injuries in the poem and all
of them were fatal....
Bibliography: Adams, Henry Foster. “A Note of the Effect of Rhythm on Memory.” Psychological Review
Volume 22.4 (July, 1915): 289—298
Arieti, James A.. “Achilles’ Inquiry about Machaon: The Critical Moment in the Iliad.” The
Classical Journal 79.2 (Dec., 1983—Jan., 1984): 125-130.
Blickman, Daniel R. “The Role of the Plague in the Iliad." Classical Antiquity Volume 6.1
Burkert, Walter. "The making of Homer in the 6th century BC: Rhapsodes versus Stesichorus."
Papers on the Amasis Painter and his World, Malibu: Getty Museum, 1987: 43–62.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Homer. The Iliad. Edited and translated by Robert Fagles. New York: Penguin, 1991.
Neal, Tamara. The Wounded Hero: Non-Fatal Injury in Homer 's Iliad. Switzerland: Peter Lang
Nutton, Vivian. Ancient Medicine. Edited by Liba Taub. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2004.
Oxford University: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Paipetis, S. A. Science and Technology in Homeric Epics. Springer Science + Business Media
B.V., 2008: 280.
Ranta, Jerrald. “The Drama of Plato 's "Ion." The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Volume
26.2 (Winter, 1967): 219-229.
Translated by Cornelius G. Comegys, M.D.. Cincinnati: Moore, Wilstach, Keys & Co.,
(March, 2007): 112—115.
Saunders, K. B.. “Frölich’s Table of Homeric Wounds.” The Classical Quarterly New Series
54.1 (May, 2004): 1-17.
Sieben, R.. “The Homeric Concept and Practice of Medicine.” Stanford Medical Bulletin
(August 20, 1962): 130-136
Smith, Wesely D.. “Physiology in the Homeric Poems.” Transactions and Proceedings of the
American Philological Association 97 (1966): 547-556.
Urso C. “Anatomical references in Homer 's Iliad.” Pathologica Volume 89.1 (February, 1997):
Viale, G. “An intriguing fragment of pre-hippocratic medicine in Aeschylus.” Neurosurgery
Volume 55.4 (October 2004): 761—766.
Warren, C.P. “Some Aspects of Medicine in the Greek Bronze Age.” Medical History Volume
14.4 (October 1970): 364–377.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document