Preview

Hitler and Stalin

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
785 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hitler and Stalin
Compare and contrast the methods used by Stalin and Hitler to keep opposition to their rule to a minimum

To start off this comparison and contrast between the two great leaders, I would like to take in to account that both of them gained absolute power in the similar period of time. As we know Hitler was declared chancellor of Germany in January 1933, a few years back in 1929 Stalin emerged as the great leader and by the early 1930s he was unstoppable having no opposition that can stop his reign. There were just individuals who threatened him from time to time. After the both leaders came in complete power no or little opposition was facing them. Both leaders used different types of force to restrain their opposition, comparing the two dictators there are differences but also some similarities in using force in case the opposition tries to overtake them.
Stalin faced the opposition during his rise to power 1924-1929, but also in his consolidation as a supreme leader 1930-1934.
Stalin’s methods of dealing with the opposition mainly consisted of replacing their supporters with his own ones, and simple dismissing them for various reasons, spying and anti-communism. The contrast is that Stalin used force from the beginning, not just during the time he was at the top but also before. During his time from 1929-1953 he had individuals which tried to overtake him in votes, these people such as Kirov in 1934 didn’t last long because Stalin order his secret police to eliminate each individual who has been following Trotskyism. Using the great purge in the summer of 1936 also stated his regime and how he felt about his opponents. During this period he put many people to trial and most of them were executed. Many marshals and generals were the victims of this terror. He finished his supremacy with the Great terror. This terror lasted until 1939.

Hitler used force when he gained power in 1933 arresting and prohibiting the members that were against him, the communist

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hitler and Stalin are names that will be forever remember as evil master minds of killing millions of people in order to create a perfect race. In this paper, there will be a comparison of Hitler and Stalin’s careers. Also, investigating which one had a greater impact on the twentieth century.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The new regime made no bones about using coercion in many forms against its declared enemies”2 However, enemies were not the only group that were at threat from Hitler and his coercion policies. Hitler, unlike previous German rulers, realised that in order to secure his position he must have a wall of protection against any possible uprising in the country if he was to remain as the Chancellor of Germany. The SS was created by Hitler and expanded “into a nationwide organisation to hunt down enemies of the state.”3 Here Historian, Boxer, highlights the idea that the SS were created to wipe out any possible opposition to Nazi ideology a prime example of this being The Night Of The Long Knives. This saw Hitler wipe out his previous task force in 1934, as he feared they might “compromise his plan to suppress workers’ rights in exchange for German industry making the country war ready.”4 Hitler showed here that he was prepared to use physical coercion tactics on almost anyone including men he had worked closely with as “Rohm and dozens of SA leaders were summarily executed.”5 Had Hitler not have used coercion in this example then it could have been possible that the “radical ambitions of the SA, who kept longing for a real social revolution.”6 May have had enough strength to remove Hitler from power and begin a revolution of their own; therefore in this case coercion proved to be important to him and his challenge of…

    • 998 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin were two of the most evil men in history, responsible for countless atrocities. They had many similarities as well. Both men committed genocide to further their political agenda, massively improved the militaries of their respective countries, had their own different groups of secret police and spies, and finally they were both tyrannical totalitarian dictators. Despite sharing many similarities, their government structure and political philosophies were very different. Adolf Hitler was a Fascist who believed in a highly centralized government with himself at the top of the pyramid. Joseph Stalin was a communist who believed in collectivism and instilling fear into his political opposition. Although there are…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hitler. Stalin. Mussolini. These three names define World War II. World policy revolved around them for at least a decade or in Stalin 's case for almost fifty years. Much is generally known about each man 's role in the war, but only as it pertains to the outcome. Not many people possess extensive knowledge of these dictators as individuals or as leaders of a particular party. This paper will attempt to shed light on the differences as well as the similarities of they style of totalitarianism that the three men who shaped the middle of the twentieth century implemented in their respective countries.…

    • 3072 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler Vs. Stalin

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the time of World War II period in the 1900s, two rulers from two great nations rose to power. They are Hitler from the Nazi Germany and Stalin from the Soviet Union. Both of the two leaders share some similarities in their rule, for example they had total control of their countries. However, there are few differences between them as well. By examining the historical events, we can see that how Hitler and Stalin led Germany and Soviet Union to the top of world stage.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin and Purges

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The aim of this investigation is to assess how the purges of 1934-38 helped Stalin preserve his power in the Soviet Union. In order to evaluate this, the investigation assesses Stalin’s role in relation to the purges, as well as their purpose. An analysis of this should indicate the extent to which the purges were successful, and their contribution to Stalin’s power. In the section entitled Evaluation of Sources, two sources used for this investigation (The Great Terror: A Reassessment, and Origins of the great purges: the Soviet Communist Party reconsidered, 1933-1938) are evaluated according to their values, limitations, origins, and purposes.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the show trials and ‘The Terror’, Stalin shaped the Communist Party and Soviet society to a significant extent from 1934 to 1941 through the use of fear and control to assume total power with no opposition. The Great Terror aimed to target individuals who undermined Stalin’s regime, and was catalysed by the assassination of Sergei Kirov, a Bolshevik revolutionary working below Stalin who would often challenge him. Through the use of political purges, Stalin shaped the Communist party to a significant extent, eliminating and denouncing any possible rivals while also creating fear within his government. Similarly, through the show trials and the purges, Stalin significantly restructured society, creating a need for obedience through the use of terror within soviet society. However, Stalin…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benito Mussolini was given power to take charge of the government because he was the best hope for the dynasty at the time for Italy. As soon as he was the leader, he abolished democracy and outlawed all political parties except the Fascists. He maintained power by creating the secret police, imposed censorship and travel restrictions, and kept close control of the economy. Joseph Stalin became the leader of the Soviet Union in 1929 because they were experiencing multiple revolutions and a civil war. He became a communist dictator; private farms were eliminated in favor of collective farms, millions of peasants were killed on his order, and he secured the Soviet control of the countryside. He maintained power by using interrogation and murder to intimidate his enemies and the general public. Adolf Hitler was a politician who volunteered for the German Army in World War I and was twice awarded the Iron Cross, a medal for bravery. The German brand of fascism was known as Nazism, it was supported by people in the middle and lower classes. Soon Hitler’s success as an organizer and speaker led him to be the leader of the Nazi party. Very quickly the Nazi’s became the largest political party. Hitler acted quickly to strengthen his position; his methods of control were fear and intimidation. He banned unions and other political parties, conducted secret trials, and persecuted enemies. He made anti-Semitism an official policy (blamed Jews for all of Germany’s problems) and made clear the Germans were the master race, “Aryans”. The rise of totalitarian dictators was one of the supreme changes in the history of the world since the…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, some of the ways these dictators were similar are both thought it was right that superior countries can invade other inferior countries. Both…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Censorship had significantly aided Hitler in isolating alternative views, however, the Gestapo and the Night of the Long Knives were the most effective ways in which he dealt with opposition during 1933 and 1939 as through the Gestapo, and Hitler was able to remove political opponents by removing their rights to protest. Also, through the Night of the Long Knives, Hitler was able to appease the army and they were removed as a threat to his power.…

    • 778 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some would argue that his totalitarian personality shaped the purges. It is believed that Stalin had extreme paranoia. This meant that he was sickly suspicious of everyone. Everywhere he looked he would see enemies or spies, ready to betray him. This would mean that Stalin felt that he had no choice. The purges were a way to deal with the intense paranoia he was carrying around with him. He felt he had so many enemies the only way to remain as leader of the Soviet Union would be to dispose of them. He had to tend to his totalitarian personality and convince himself he was always in complete control. He used the purges as a controlling weapon; terror was the way to control people, and the way they acted. It could be concluded that it was in fact Stalin’s state of mind and his dangerously flawed personality which meant that he felt he had no choice. Alternately, putting aside Stalin’s state of mind, you could argue that Stalin was acting in the interest of the party and the revolution; he believed that his removal from leader or the reversal of his policies would be disastrous for the Soviet Union. We therefore need to look into external factors of the culture Stalin reigned…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stalin’s purges of 1937 were debatably one of the most horrific events of the 1900s. Stalin, the General Secretary of the Soviet Union, decided that to be able to have a nation which aligned with his political ideas, he would need to eradicate those who he deemed went against these views. Stalin used the purges as a method to exercise his political control over his population and control the political spectrum. Stalin killed millions during the purges. About four years later, Hitler, the leader of Germany, conducted what is referred to today as the Holocaust.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the time the terror subsided in 1939, Stalin had managed to bring both the party and the public to a state of complete submission to his rule. Soviet society was so atomized and the people so fearful of reprisals that mass arrests were no longer necessary. Stalin ruled as absolute dictator of the Soviet Union throughout World War II and until his death in March 1953…

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fdr vs. Hitler

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the movie Hitler vs. FDR by Bill Moyers expresses Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Adolf Hitler were entirely different in their state of power in their country's, but they are considered to be some of the best leaders in the 19th century. They both pulled their countries out of depression. They were important to their country's growth.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. Left Wing Extremism

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Stalin- Put a more extreme character of the U.S.S.R sending all opponents to Labour Camps…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays