This analysis of civil war onset relies on the country’s GDP per capita and the effect this metric has on individuals’ motivations; when a country has slow economic progress and the GDP/capita is low, individuals have a lower opportunity cost to joining an insurgency (Collier and Hoeffler 569). This, compounded with a state with trafficable resources that aren’t protected by the state, provides an economic incentive to insurgents. Additionally, Collier and Hoeffler argue that this economic incentive applies to groups in terms of securing funding or …show more content…
Horowitz’s article goes on to imply that the conflicts plaguing areas with strong ethnic and religious divisions are not the only civil wars affected by group dynamics, “The intensity of any conflict is, in large part, a function of the relative strength of group claims” (Horowitz 215). This is key to understanding civil war onset as a more general concept – rebellions are fueled by group claims, and these groups for via shared identity, grievances, or from other cleavages that have formed. The Cederman et al article also finds its focus in group action and motivation, as groups under this model are likely to rebel in order to gain state power. While the power of the state here is a present, important force, the agency remains with the groups as they attempt to acquire the resources they desire and gain political power.