Many people who are concerned about the fate of the world's poor now attribute their plight to globalization. They argue that globalization has weakened the position of poor countries and exposed poor people to harmful competition. Their concern is understandable, especially since the gap between rich and poor has indeed become more glaring in recent decades. However, proving a direct link between economic globalization and poverty is a complex task for several reasons:
Globalization as a single cause. Specifying how globalization affects the economic status of countries or individuals is not easy. The effects of "globalization" may be due to competition among workers, or foreign investment, or trade, or government borrowing. There is no single measure of integration into the world economy. Each aspect of integration can have variable effects.
Poverty as a multidimensional phenomenon. Poverty can be measured in different ways-for example, relative to a country's average, by consumption capacity, or in terms of overall well-being. Many people in many places historically have been poor for many reasons. Attributing (increases in) poverty to globalization therefore requires proving that globalization has become a dominant factor in producing a new kind of poverty.
Globalization and overall global poverty. By common consent, globalization has proceeded rapidly since the 1980s. Yet according to the recent Global Poverty Report, the proportion of the world population living in poverty has declined from 29% in 1988 to 26% in 1998. Moreover, social indicators for many poor countries also show improvement over several decades.
Globalization and poverty in specific countries. If globalization causes poverty, then countries that become more economically integrated via trade and investment should do worse. But some that have become more integrated into the world economy, such as China, have made progress. Others, for example in sub-Saharan Africa, that have remained relatively isolated have experienced declines. Such overall differences do not settle the issue, since many other factors may be at work, but they do cast some doubt on the overall argument.
Poverty vs. inequality. There is ample evidence that the gap between the richest and poorest countries, and between the richest and poorest groups of individuals in the world, has increased. But inequality may increase without an increase in poverty rates, for example if globalization increases opportunities for the wealthy more rapidly than for the poor. Since increasing wealth may be due to many causes, showing that the rich get richer because the poor get poorer is trickier than recording and lamenting the fact of inequality as such.
Globalization as catchall. One characteristic of arguments linking globalization and poverty is the generalization from specific instances of impoverishment to grand global developments. When governments assume debt in private capital markets and declining world demand for their commodities depresses prices and they seek funds from the IMF to repay loans and they agree to conditions for internal reform and these conditions impose hardship on their people, it is tempting to conclude that therefore "globalization" causes poverty.
Global Poverty Report
This report to the 2000 G8 meeting outlines poverty trends and scenarios.
Growth Is Good for the Poor
A World Bank paper argues that the poor benefit from overall growth, anti-inflation policies, and economic openness.
Growth with Equity
This Oxfam paper disputes the analysis in the World Bank's "Growth Is Good" paper by arguing that while growth helps the poor, the real question is how to convert growth into a higher rate of poverty reduction.
Missing the Target
This Oxfam report finds little progress since 1995 towards official UN development goals in child health, education and poverty.
GLOBALIZATION ISSUES 1. What is globalization? 2. How does globalization affect women? 3. Does globalization cause poverty? 4. Why are so many people opposed to globalization? 5. Does globalization diminish cultural diversity? 6. Can globalization be controlled?
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
What can two dollars buy you? A small coffee at Starbucks, a candy bar, bag of chips, and a soda, a slice of pizza. For nearly three billion people, approximately half of the world 's population, two dollars a day is all the money that the person has to live on. Moreover, of the 2.2 billion children in the world, 1 billion grow up in poverty; 640 million without adequate shelter, 400 millions with no access to safe water, and 270 million with no access to health services (UNICEF 2005). One proposed reason for this harsh reality of high poverty rates is globalization - the growing integration of economies and societies around the world. The claim that globalization generates poverty has been the focus of many debates for the last twenty years, including the debate between Carlos Caretto, Gillian Crowl, Steve Grossman, and Annie Wong on February 21, 2005. Caretto and Crowl argued that poverty is an indirect result of globalization as is evident by high unemployment rates, wage inequality, and diminishing health and educational programs. Grossman and Wong contended that globalization does not generate poverty, but it in fact helps the world by promoting education, decreasing and shortening the length of wars, and increasing new resources. Close examination of the facts presented in lectures, readings, and the debates shows that each side presents logical evidence, but the facts confirm that globalization does in fact generate poverty.…
- 1917 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Is there a link between globalization and global inequality? Some scholars avoid giving a definite answer to this question. As effects of globalization vary with countries’ population, geographical location, and history, “the causal link between globalization and global inequality is very difficult to make” (Milanovic 11). Many mainstream economists, however, argue that globalization is not the culprit for global wealth gap: the followings are brief summaries of three of their arguments. First, strongly supported by David Ricardo’s theory that all countries have a comparative advantage in some products, so they always better off by trading each other, mainstream economists contend that trade liberalization, one of key components of globalization, has driven economic growth of many countries. Many of developing countries that recently opened and liberalized their markets, such as China and India, enjoyed higher growth rate in the last two decades than before (Birdsall 6). Second, multinational corporations, which have been a major driving force of globalization, brought two significant benefits to the world; they created new middle classes in poor and developing countries by providing jobs in low-skilled sectors and benefited consumers by increasing domestic competition that put downward pressure on prices (Schuler 315). Finally, technological advances, especially in transportation and communication, have alleviated poverty in remote peripheral areas by more effectively connecting them to central developed cities. New technology also provides more efficient ways to use deficient natural resources in Sub-Saharan areas, contributing to resolve food problems (Rodrick 4). These three arguments, which cover key issues of globalization – trade liberalization, multinational corporations, and advance of new technologies, however, fail to illuminate how they do harm to poor, developing countries in various ways.…
- 1990 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The impact of globalization is one of the most controversial development issues of the day. Globaphobes attribute most of the ills of the world to globalization. The anti-globalization movement has focused attention on the extent to which decisions affecting the lives of millions of the world’s poorest people are made in international fora at which they have no voice. Globalization is seen as marginalizing a large part of the world’s population and contributing to increased international inequality. On the other hand, globaphiles see extending globalization as the key to eliminating world poverty. They point to the rapid economic growth of countries which have integrated with the global economy and the poverty reduction achieved in countries such as China and Vietnam which have opened up their economies in recent years. Part of the debate arises from very different views of what constitutes globalization. The anti-globalization movement often equates globalization with neo-liberal policies including privatization and domestic deregulation. On the other hand the supporters of globalization tend to define it much more narrowly, often equating it with trade liberalization or greater economic openness of national economies. Here we define globalization as a process of greater integration within the world economy through movements of goods and services, capital, technology and (to a lesser extent) labour, which lead increasingly to economic decisions being influenced by global conditions. There is also debate over the meaning and measurement of poverty. Even if one puts to one side the question of whether…
- 6456 Words
- 26 Pages
Powerful Essays -
There is an international poverty trap but this does not necessarily mean that globalization is causing chronic poverty. Globalization, in putting chronic poverty into a global context it also becomes necessary to understand how the current form of globalization is affecting these international relationships.…
- 2846 Words
- 12 Pages
Good Essays -
Global poverty is all about the division of the rich and the poor. The wealthy in power want to make sure they stay in power. The scarce resources that are competed for are food, money, and equal rights. People in poverty are competing for food in order to feed themselves and their families. They are also competing for money in order to survive, but those in power are also competing for money to continue getting wealthier and preserving their control. Exploited people are competing for equal rights, and to not be taken advantage of by others. Those affected by poverty are vying for change. They want to improve their economies, and get rid of the people in power who are exploiting…
- 534 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Globalization, a very recently used term in the international society. The term globalization means to merge with the international society in lots of aspects such as in culture, ideology, politics, and trade. Amongst these aspects which builds up globalization, global trade had grown in the human history even before the age of colonialsm. As an example, the italian nation had a very prospering economy back in the renaissance ages ( Which lasted from 1300 to the 1700s ) which was a result from the professionalism of the italian producers to manufacture and trade items to foreign countries, which then result in a prospering income which supports the…
- 1026 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Globalization can be thought of as the widening, intensifying, speeding up, and growing impact of worldwide interconnectedness. With the development of globalization, the world is gradually developed into a "global village". The world witnesses in this millennium they are drastic change in the various fields of everyday life. Researchers debate whether the force of globalization will improve people’s living standards. This essay will argue that globalization raise living standards for International education, better health services and material goods.…
- 1105 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Globalization, as Friedman states, helps the world grow together as the advancement of technology has allowed poor nations to grow economically. On the contrary, Sen mentions that there needs to be institutional reforms for globalization to have a lasting effect on the world as a whole. Along with Sen, Florida argues that the world is spiky because of the wide disparity between rich and poor. With these three well accounted opinions in mind, I believe that Globalization is good for the world because as “Friedman points out, it helps lagging countries catch up to the rest of the world as well as introducing new technological advances that will help the world grow economically as a whole”( Friedman, Thomas L. (2005) The World is Flat: A Brief History of the 21st Century, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.)…
- 691 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Globalization refers to the ways in which capital; people, information and culture can now flow back and forth across national borders with a greater ease and greater rapidity than they had before this new phenomenon. Globalization, the growing integration of economies and societies around the world, was a word hardly used only a few years ago and now I doubt if there is a single country in the world where globalization isn't being discussed. The global spread of the term is evidence that something very new is happening in the world but I'm not saying this new term is beneficial for all.…
- 2741 Words
- 9 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Last five decades have witnessed a remarkable change in the economic fortunes of various countries and continents. The poor, underdeveloped, developing and emerging countries that account for two-fifth of the world population have, by and large, undergone structural transformation of the magnitude that is unprecedented and was not anticipated. The economic power equilibrium is gradually shifting from the advanced countries to developing, countries. The distinction between advanced and developing, North and South, First World and Third World is becoming redundant and irrelevant. For the first time since cross-country data on poverty is being compiled all the six continents have recorded a decline in the incidence of poverty. The Millennium Development Goal of reducing poverty by one half has been achieved five years ahead of 2015.…
- 3038 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
n the age of globalization, the rich and poor divide has grown into a chasm. Richer and more developed countries enjoy access to technology and a higher standard of living, whereas the poorer and less developed countries are struggling with poverty, malnutrition and lack of basic amenities.…
- 1639 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Many people view the economic globalisation as a process that offers fear or rather threat to many local markets. They also see it as it makes poor people become poorer and wealthy people become wealthier. It is a fact that economic globalisation offers inequality and not evenly contributed throughout the world. Many countries which have not embraced globalisation, either because of their strategic location or the lack of natural resources, face a sharp increase in poverty, squalor, and diseases. As IMF staff notes:…
- 1337 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Disturbed by the combination of increasing wealth and persistent poverty, some people are pointing to globalization as…
- 15175 Words
- 61 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Extreme global poverty is a problem that affects a large percentage of the world's population and will continue to spread until serious action is taken against it by the wealthier nations. However, the amount of obligation, if any, that countries feel they have to deal with such a problem is a main source of controversy and one of the reasons why poverty is taking so long to be reduced.…
- 750 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Analyse the Causes of Poverty in the World and Evaluate Attempts to Address it on a Global Scale…
- 1394 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays