Preview

Gideon's Trumpet

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4806 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gideon's Trumpet
Gideon’s Trumpet: Book Review
Chapter One:
Chapter one opens with the origination of Clarence Gideon’s request for an appeal to the United States Supreme Court. The letter he wrote to the Court was full of legal jargon so the Justices knew that he must have read the rules to the court process of appealing the case in question. He knew these rules because he had applied for an appeal to the court once before, in which he did not include a pauper’s affidavit and the court sent him a copy of the rules and a sample of the affidavit he originally needed to file. He wanted the United States Supreme Court to let him free since he was denied his due process right to a court appointed attorney because he was too poor to be able to provide counsel for himself. The Supreme Court had already had a case 20 years before, Betts v. Brady , which states that only in special circumstances does a defendant receive court appointed counsel. The circumstances were as follows; illiteracy, ignorance, youth, or mental illness. He did not qualify under any of those reasons. The chapter ends with the author summarizing the Florida court transcripts from the case The State of Florida v. Clarence Earl Gideon. After the judge announced the case and got the proceedings started, he asked if both sides of were ready to start the trial. The State answered “yes” and Gideon replied “no” then asked for a court appointed attorney. The judge stated that only persons on capital cases may receive this luxury. Gideon was then charged and put in jail after the court made sure the transcript stated everything that Gideon had said and that the court had made him aware of his rights for the situation.
Chapter Two:
In this chapter the issue at hand involves the jurisdiction of the federal and state courts. What the Supreme Court can and cannot do. It is explained that the reach is limited to only federal laws. Stating that when a state has decided that a person acted in a way that violates state

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It says in the article (which article, again please cite your sources) “supporters of the states’ rights argue that states need greater power to prevent the federal government from lording over them and imposing policies they oppose.” This means the states want more power, so the federal government does not take control over them. If the national government had more power they could divide the powers evenly through federal,states and themselves. Now people (what people? Where are the sources here?) say on the other hand the national government has too much power. Now it says “the federal power has grown to untenable levels, threatening individual liberties which leads to federal abuse of powers.” This is saying, if the national government Didn't have so much power they could worry about trying to keep everyone equal and not one overpowering…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1963 Clarence Earl Gideon presented himself in front of the Supreme Court. Gideon had been indicted for breaking and entering; after defending himself in his preliminary trial he was sentenced to five years in prison. During his time in jail, Gideon did some research on law and wrote an appeal to the Supreme Court. Gideon’s request of representation was on behalf of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court decided to put the case on trial; it related back to the Betts v. Brady case of 1942. Unlike Betts v. Brady’s 6-3 ruling in which Betts had lost, Gideon won the case with an astounding 9-0 majority. The main issue of the case centers on proper representation of the defendant. In order for the reader to fully understand the scope of the case, he or she needs to consider Betts v. Brady.…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. The justices essentially claimed for themselves the right to override the decisions of state courts.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alfonso Lopez Case Summary

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Perhaps one of the most seminal Supreme Court decisions was the case of United States v. Alfonso Lopez (1995). After nearly a half-century of decisions by the Court in favor of expanded federal power via the Constitution’s Interstate Commerce Clause, the Justices issued a ruling limiting the reach of Congress, signaling a seismic shift on the Court’s interpretation of the Clause. The Court’s decision also sent a strong statement to Congress regarding the legislative body’s jurisdiction over a bevy of activities with a nexus to interstate commerce — from gun control to environmental protection to education.…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the groundbreaking case Gideon vs. Wainwright we are given a prime example of a Supreme Court case and its impact on federalism. Gideon was accused of felony burglary charges after an eyewitness placed him at the scene of a robbery. Although there was no evidence of him committing the crime, police arrested him and charged him with the theft based solely on an eye witness report. The sequences of events that would follow would change the way states were ordered to provide due process and create a fair and balanced trial for all felony trials.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you thought about how much the Supreme Court decisions really affect your life and what we do on a daily basis or how important these decisions are to our civil liberties? Earl Warren and William Rehnquist are two of the most well knows Supreme Court Chief Justices. Each having different opinions on the importance’s of civil liberties and public order maintenance. Many of the court cases that each Chief Justice would hear would change the very way that we live today. As well as how law enforcement interact with regards to the 5th, 6th, 8th, and 14th Amendments. In this essay we will discuss compare and contrast the Chief Justice Earl Warrens Court versus the William Rehnquist Court, with special regards to how they effected the law enforcements, then finally addressing how the current Supreme Court balances out civil liberties against public order maintenance.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The case of Arizona v. United States is a Supreme Court case dealing with the issue of the state of Arizona trying to enact laws against illegal aliens inside the state’s borders. These previsions implemented by the state of Arizona conflicted with the Federal Government, by infringing upon the right of the government to exclusively regulate immigration. This paper will discuss facts, and explain some issues having to do with immigration laws within the United States and its conflict with the state of Arizona. It will go over the actual opinion as well as opinions from the justices. It will conclude with the pros and cons of the decision of Arizona v. United States.…

    • 2814 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speedy Trial Analysis

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first pertinent point to make on behalf of the argument that Flordia must provide a lawyer for Mr. Gideon is that the 6th Amendment guarantees a person the right to consult a lawyer in his or her defense. For example, every person, no matter…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gideon's Trumpet

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Gideon’s Trumpet” is a movie based on a book by Anthony Lewis which tells the story behind the 1963 landmark court case of Gideon vs. Wainwright. Produced in 1980 by Hallmark Hall of Fame production and directed by Robert L. Collins, "Gideon's Trumpet” tells the story behind a basic right most Americans now take for granted: the right to a lawyer. The movie stars Henry Fonda as Clarence Earl Gideon, José Ferrer as Abe Fortas and John Houseman as the chief justice.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Math

    • 4047 Words
    • 10 Pages

    "The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations,…

    • 4047 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison Essay

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The power of judicial review was then extended by the Supreme Court to cover actions of state governments, as shown in Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee. In this case, the Court ruled that it could review and overrule state court…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Federal Jurisdiction

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will discuss a case involving Henry, a resident of Nevada, who sued Adam, a resident of Utah in the Federal Court in California. Henry sought $60,000 damages for personal injuries arising from an automobile accident that occurred in Los Angeles, California. I will answer the following questions about this case. Does the Federal Court have jurisdiction? What rules of procedure will the court use? Why? And what rules of substantive law will the court use? One of the most essential questions of law is whether a given court has jurisdiction to preside over a given case. Jurisdiction means the power to hear a case. Many courts have limited jurisdictions or limited powers, meaning they can only hear certain types of cases. “An example of this type of limited power is “municipal courts that are limited to city’s residents” (Morgan et al., 2010, p. 29). Any court owns jurisdiction over matters only to the degree granted to it by the Constitution, or legislation of the authority on behalf of which it functions. The question of whether a given court has the power to determine a jurisdictional question is itself, in my opinion a jurisdictional question.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another way in which Supreme Court decisions have impacted the issue of state power in relation to federal power is that federal judges, under the…

    • 870 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Identify and describe two limits placed upon the powers of the United States Supreme Court. First, the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court are at the top of a pyramid with a very wide state and local base of criminal justice administration. So the Supreme Court has to depend on local courts, prosecutors, and police officers to apply its decisions to day-to-day operations. Second, and just as important, U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, and state courts answer constitutional questions the Supreme Court hasn’t answered yet—and often never will (Amsterdam 1970, 785).…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bitcoin Case Study

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages

    violation of its jurisdiction, an aggrieved party may file a petition in the State High Court. It is important to note that while challenging the decision of a statutory authority, generally the scope of appeal is limited and there is a high degree of deference by courts. The Supreme Court has recognized that in matters relating to economic policy, courts must not interfere unless arbitrariness is writ large in the decision making process. Even in cases where intervention of the court is justified, the court would only examine the decision making process and not the decision itself.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays