Preview

Games Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1865 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Games Theory
GAMES THEORY

In game theory, Nash equilibrium (named after John Forbes Nash, who proposed it) is a solution concept of a game involving two or more players, in which each player is assumed to know the equilibrium strategies of the other players, and no player has anything to gain by changing only his own strategy unilaterally. If each player has chosen a strategy and no player can benefit by changing his or her strategy while the other players keep theirs unchanged, then the current set of strategy choices and the corresponding payoffs constitute Nash equilibrium.

Stated simply, Amy and Phil are in Nash equilibrium if Amy is making the best decision she can, taking into account Phil's decision, and Phil is making the best decision he can, taking into account Amy's decision. Likewise, a group of players is in Nash equilibrium if each one is making the best decision that he or she can, taking into account the decisions of the others. However, Nash equilibrium does not necessarily mean the best payoff for all the players involved; in many cases, all the players might improve their payoffs if they could somehow agree on strategies different from the Nash equilibrium: e.g., competing businesses forming a cartel in order to increase their profits.

The prisoner's dilemma is a fundamental problem in game theory that demonstrates why two people might not cooperate even if it is in both their best interests to do so. It was originally framed by Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher working at RAND in 1950. Albert W. Tucker formalized the game with prison sentence payoffs and gave it the "prisoner's dilemma" name (Poundstone, 1992).

A classic example of the prisoner's dilemma (PD) is presented as follows: Two suspects are arrested by the police. The police have insufficient evidence for a conviction, and, having separated the prisoners, visit each of them to offer the same deal. If one testifies for the prosecution against the other (defects) and the other remains

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    IAT 210 – Week 1 Summer 2014 From Plato If you would read a man’s Disposition, see him Game: You will then learn more of him in one hour, than in seven Years Conversation, and little Wagers will try him as soon as great Stakes, for then he is off his Guard.…

    • 563 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay On Conflict Theory

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If everybody had an even playing field then everybody would be equal, this would eliminate value. Conflict Theory is used to secure resources and maintain the value of them for the rich. Furthermore, the wealthy working together as one to maintain the value of themselves. This immediately impacts the education system.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this game, there are two pure strategy Nash equilibrium, (2,1) and (1,2). Thus, Firm 1 prefers the equilibrium (2,1) more than any other strategy profile and Firm 2 prefers (1,2) to all others.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s a solution concept of a non-cooperative game, involving two or more players in which each player is assumed to know the same strategies of another player, and no player has anything to gain by changing their own strategy. He also did work in the area of real algebraic geometry including the Nash embedding theorem. It states that every Riemannian manifold can be isometrically embedded into some Euclidean space. Also in her book “A Beautiful Mind”, author Sylvia Nasar explains that Nash was working on proving a theorem for Hilbert’s nineteenth problem (a well-known elliptic…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Managerial Economics

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    is where each player maximizes his own payoff given the action of the other player.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I heard the prisoner’s dilemma from my economics class’s teacher and later I found out this dilemma almost happen every day and everywhere, so I’d like to inform this concept to all of you.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Game Theory

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Background: For this assignment, you will plan and play a game with your family or friends, or at work based on the idea of the classic prisoner's dilemma. If you have had a class on game theory, you will be well aware of this concept. It forms the basis of many TV game shows. The prisoner's dilemma was illustrated in Truman Capote's book, "In Cold Blood" concerning the 1959 robbery of a Kansas farmhouse by Perry Smith and Dick Hickock, who murdered their victims in order to eliminate the witnesses. After the men were captured, the police interrogated them separately. To get a confession, the police offered the men a reduced sentence for cooperating. Failure to cooperate would result in a death penalty charge for both.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apa Format

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Downing, L.L. (1975). The prisoners dilemma game as a problem solving phenomenon: An outcome maximization interpretation. Simulation and Games, 6, 366-391.…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Game Theory

    • 2670 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Game theory is defined as “the study of the ways in which strategic interactions among economic agents produce outcomeswith respect to thepreferences of those agents, where the outcomes in question might have been intended by none of the agents” by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Ross 1997). The disciplines most involved in game theory “are mathematics, economics and the other social and behavioral sciences” (McCain 1997). Game theory was created to confront the problem and provide a theory of economic and strategic behavior. In game theory, "games" have always been a metaphor for more serious interactions in human society. But game theory addresses the serious interactions using the metaphor of a game: in these serious interactions, as in games, the individual's choice is essentially a choice of a strategy, and the outcome of the interaction depends on the strategies chosen by each of the participants (McCain1997).…

    • 2670 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Game Theory

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After reading the Wall Street Journal’s article regarding game theory, one realizes that economics has many facets. Game theory is trying to anticipate what the competition will do or is contemplating. (Barnett, 1995). It 's really like playing chess. But unlike chess, there will be a winner and loser, you can have win-win and lose-lose situations in business. To avoid having retaliation from the competition, it is best to have those firms in the industry view the actions as beneficial to all, or at least to be nonthreatening. Companies viewing the competitor’s decisions as being in the best interest of the industry will also avoid a costly price war.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: AXELROD, 1~ (1978) Copzng wzth deception, International conference on applied game theory, Vmnna LEE, V,r. (1971) Dec~szon theory and human behaviour, J. Wiley, New York LuCE, R and H ]{AIFFA (1957). Games and deczszons, J Wiley, New York. OWEN, G. (1968) Game theory, ~V. Saunders, Philadelphia.…

    • 4460 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Game theory, which is the study of strategic decision-making, is particularly useful for poker as poker involves probability. In other words, it involves the probability of a specific hand being played. Poker also involves other strategic elements, such as bluffing, which is when a player tricks another player into thinking he/she will play a specific card, usually by the use of facial expressions. Poker is naturally a zero-sum game, a game in which the sum of all gains and losses will always equal to zero. I will limit the scope of my analysis to a two-person zero-sum game, as multiple player games are too complex and a two-person zero-sum game will allow me to analyze in greater depth.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zero- sum game and non-zero are terms used to refer to situations where there are gains and losses. Non-zero sum game is where one decision gain or loss doesn't necessarily result in the others loss or gain. In this theory, the wins and loses, of all players do not add up to zero and everyone can win or lose. Commonly this is referred to as a “win-win situation” The common example given of this is the prisoner's dilemma, a situation where two people are committed a crime are being interrogated separately, they are given two choices that will create three outcomes. If prisoner 1 keeps his mouth shut and doesn't say anything but prisoner 2 tells everything, prisoner a will get the worst punishment while prisoner 2 walks free, and vice…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    SYMBOLIC SYSTEMS 202: The Rationality Debate (3 units) Winter Quarter 2003-2004, Stanford University Instructor: Todd Davies…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prisoner’s dilemma is the best known game of strategy. It helps us to understand what regulates the balance between team work and competition. In traditional version of game, the cops have arrested two suspects P1 & P2 and interrogating them in separate rooms. The police don’t have enough evidence to convict them. If they could get a confession from either of them then they can convict them both. They have four options now:…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics