Preview

Future Energy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1340 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Future Energy
Future energy
Have you ever thought about the energy providing you electricity for your daily life that nuclear power could take you off from this world (it is not clear what you mean here)? What was your feeling when you watching news about the Fukushima nuclear crisis? What do you think when you see how victims of Chernobyl disaster live today? Good start – the questions are a very good way to get your reader's attention.) All of those issues are just because of one reason – the safety problem of nuclear power. The question is: Can we control it completely? This question is not only for some people or some groups; the /a specific government (or governments? as with your other essays on this topic, be clear about what you mean. Are you thinking about one specific government? Governments in general?) should consider their citizens and, even every single species living on this planet. Apparently, some countriesy could not dominate nuclear power so that tragedy was happened and severely affected on millions of people. For this reason, I think government (again, be clear – one specific government? Governments in general? should replace nuclear power by alternatives such as solar electrical energy ? Is this supposed to be here? generation and wind electric power generation.
Sustainabilityle is the most important index for every type of energy resource. People argues that nuclear is the most sustainable energy resource they have. The fuel of nuclear power cost that uranium and plutonium is the precious metals in the nature (?It is not clear what you mean here). But people who support nuclear power seems to have ignored the fact that the storage of precious metals is very low; it has some day that exhaust from the Earth (awkward – perhaps “will some day be exhausted from the earth”?). People know that wind energy and solar energy all have been exploited (this is really the heart of your argument in this paragraph, but this part of the sentence is not clear. What do

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Eugene Robinson, author of “No Fail-Safe Option”, writes during the recent destruction of the Fukushima power plant, cautioning the use of nuclear power, and touching on the Chernobyl incident. He claims that the idea of nuclear energy, in spite of its benefits, is not worth the destruction and damage it could potentially cause.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Due by Day 7 . Nuclear Power . All energy sources have drawbacks. Even the clean hydropower option has negative ramifications. Weigh those against the possible consequences of developing nuclear power, a controversial alternative to fossil fuels. Discuss the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster as well as the 20th century Chernobyl nuclear meltdown in drawing conclusions about risk versus reward of nuclear energy use. The paper must be two to three pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least one scholarly source other than the textbook to support your points. Cite your sources in text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar, in your online course.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear powers biggest threat is from the public’s perception of it. As seen in Germany as well as throughout Europe, if the public deems something too unsafe and does not want to live near it, the governments will have no choice but to shut down the plants and look for different sources of energy. Compared to biofuels and solar power, nuclear power is already extremely established and generates a large share of the worlds’ power, and faces most of its issues in the political realm instead of the practical…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First off all, what is the nuclear? Many countries use nuclear energy to generate electricity. “Unclear is the energy stored in the center or the nucleus of an atom. After we bombard the nucleus into two parts, two different elements are formed along with the emission of high energy. The process generally followed is called fission. Fission is the chain reaction which needs uranium-235.”(“Fission and fusion”)The nuclear energy is considered as the worthiest alternative resource of energy after fossil fuels, but it also has a lot of potential problems.”(“Nuclear Energy”)…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Greenpeace argues that there is nothing ‘peaceful’ about the nuclear industry. It is harmful to the environment as well as all living creatures. The Nuclear Age began in 1945 and ever since Greenpeace began, they have been trying to fight it. There has been much progress made. In 2000 nuclear powerful was discredited during the UN Climate Change talks. In 2001 the UN Sustainability Development Conference declared nuclear as an unsustainable technology.…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final Critical Assignment

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main issue of the article is whether or not we should increasingly rely on nuclear power and make it our No1 source of energy given endless concerns about its safety and expensive cost. Undoubtedly, in a world of increasing population, diminishing natural resources and worsening climate change, nuclear energy is considered the key future energy resolution. In favor of greater reliance on nuclear energy, Mark Lynas – a climate-science author strongly brought in the reasons of: 1st, nuclear power avoiding climate change while fossil fuels have failed to do so and green energy capability is still being questioned; 2nd, opponents overstating danger even after many reactors has been safety improved; 3rd, the cost is acceptable comparing to other renewables energy. In contrast, Peter A.Bradford – former commissioner of the U.S.Nulear Regulatory Commission insisted in the alternatives, arguing that nuclear power is too costly to be pursued, not to mention its danger and potential severe impacts on people’s health. Obviously, the need of understanding the issue from comprehensive perspectives with substantial data support is essential to weigh the risks and benefits of each opinion.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Energy is very important, especially for the people of the United States. It has become an integral part of our lives and we have grown dependent on it. Therein lies the problem, however, because the more we use it, the less there is. We have to find alternative forms of energy before it is gone and we are left high and dry. Not only is our sources decreasing, it is also polluting our beautiful world. Reducing the use of energy and finding alternatives is our only choice when considering the future of America. Cheap gas may sound great right now but once it is gone, it is gone for good. We cannot be selfish and only think of the now, we must look to the future and preserve our resources so that our grandkids will have a good life. We have made…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As Lucas W. Davis suggests, the continuously increasing enthusiasm for nuclear power has been shifted down by the Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011. In addition, voices for establishing restrictive regulations and increasing security systems are becoming louder and louder. Actually, controversy on nuclear power can be tracked back to the 1950s, when scientists pointed out that “nuclear accidents, proliferation risk, and the storage of spent fuel” are inevitable problems of nuclear power. Until today, these potential risks still exist and threaten people’s daily life. Therefore, more than a few economists doubt…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People have many different opinions on Nuclear Power plants and some are better than others. Some people believe that Nuclear Power Plants are too dangerous and risky, while others including us believe that nuclear power plants are good and that they can do a lot for us. Some reasons why people think nuclear power plants are bad is because they are known to be dangerous be for example the nuclear disaster in Fukushima Daiichi 2011. One big controversy of nuclear power plants is where they will store the radioactive waste. Then again many think nuclear power plants are good. They do not rely on fossil fuels, they cost less to produces electricity. We as a group think that the power plants are good and can help us produce electricity. One of…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Debates and controversial issues are what keep countries all over the world connected. Ideas that were argued upon one hundred years ago are still argued upon today. One of these ideas is nuclear energy- should we or should we not use it at such a rate? Before an opinion can be reached, you must first weigh the pros and cons of this topic. Nuclear energy can be environmentally unsafe and can also be threatening, but at the same time it can benefit the progress and development of the world.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dangers involved with nuclear power production weigh heavy on the environment as a whole. The population should start to develop newer ways to mass produce energy in a more environmentally safe way.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We live in an era of untold gasoline prices and frequent political dialogue about finding and using alternative forms of energy. Some of these alternative energy sources that are being bantered about and, in some places, implemented include solar, wind, and hydroelectric power. The majority of Americans would agree that all of these forms of alternative energy are safe and should be pursued as new means of powering the country. However, there is one well-known energy source that stirs up dissent and division among the country’s citizens: nuclear power.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of nuclear energy should be allowed to continue for many reasons such as nuclear energy is cleaner and safe when handled properly. An example of where nuclear energy is cleaner than other forms of energy such as coal-burning is in how the energy or heat is produced in the plants. In nuclear power plant the energy or heat it produced by the fission of Uranium; in a coal-burning plant the burning of coal produces the energy or heat. The Uranium power plant does not produce the soot and harmful gasses, such as CO2, that the coal-burning plant does. Also, nuclear power plants are cleaner because very little fuel is needed to create a lot of energy; and there is no air pollution like there is with a coal-burning…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays