Preview

Future Analysis of Nation State

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6263 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Future Analysis of Nation State
Future Analysis of The Nation-State System

Introduction:
It is common to hear of the threats to the nation-state system in the contemporary world. Such threats seem to originate from many different quarters, at different level of the global system. This impending sense that the nation-state is somehow in “crisis” led to analyze the question of “the contemporary crisis of the nation-state?”
But before we go into the analysis, it is important to look into the ideas that would help to understand the case, under discussion, in a better way. To begin with, let’s see the definition of nation, state and the nation-state system, according to the context under discussion.
Nation
According to the Oxford English dictionary, the word nation literally means, community of people having mainly common descent, history, language, etc or forming sovereign state or inhabiting territory.
From the above definition, there are two kinds of nations, the ethnic nation (community with common descent) and demotic nation (community with common territorial boundaries). E.K. Francis draws a distinction between ‘ethnic’ nations that are based on belief in common descent and a sense of solidarity and common identity, and ‘demotic’ nations that are based on shared administrative and military institutions, common territorial boundaries for protection and the mobility of goods and people. This is similar to the distinction often made between ‘cultural nations’, based on criteria such as language, customs, religion and the ‘political nations’, that are more contractual and derive from shared institutions, shared citizenship and a sense of shared history.

State
According to Oxford English dictionary, state literally means, political community under one government.
This means a community which is coherent with the government of the state obeys the government with its own will, making government responsible for it. It is the political organization of the people under one government.



Bibliography: 1. E.K. Francis, Interethnic Relations: An Essay in Sociological Theory (New York: Elsevier, 1976). 2. Alfred Cobban, the Nation State and National Self Determination (London: HarperCollins, 1969). 5. Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 1983) 6. Kathryn A 7. TalalAsad, Genealogies of Religion (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993). 8. Robin Cohen, ``Diasporas and the Nation-state: From Victims to Challengers’’ , International Affairs, Vol. 72, No. 3 (1996) 9. Ernest Mandel, Late Capitalism, Joris De Bres (trans.) (London: NLB, 1972). 10. Andrew Linklater, Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1990). 11. Immanuel Wallerstein, The Capitalist World Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979 12. Immanuel Wallerstein, The Politics of the World Economy: The States, the Movements and the Civilizations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984). 13. Robin Murray, ``The Internationalization of Capital and the Nation-state’’ , New Left Review, Vol. 67 (1971), 14. Peter Dicken, Global Shift: The Internationalization of Economic Activity, 2nd edn (New York: Guilford Press, 1992). 15. James H. Mittelman (ed.), Globalization: Critical Reflections (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1996) 16. R 17. John Dunn (ed.), The Economic Limits to Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990). 18. John Dunn, ``Introduction: Crisis of the Nation State?’’ , Political Studies, Vol. 42, Special Issue (1994) 19. Helen Thompson, ``The Nation-state and International Capital in Historical Perspective’’ , Government and Opposition, Vol 20. Leo Panitch, ``Rethinking the Role of the State’’, (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1996) 21. Roland Robertson, Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture (London: Sage, 1992) 22. Roland Robertson as quoted in Peter Beyer, Religion and Globalization (London: Sage, 1994) 23. Stuart Hall, ``Cultural Identity and Diaspora’’, in Jonathan Rutherford (ed.), Identity: Community, Culture, Difference (London: Lawrence &Wishart, 1990). 24. Connie L. McNeely, Constructing the Nation-state (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1995). 25. Benjamin R. Barber, ``Jihad Vs. McWorld’’ , The Atlantic Monthly (March 1992) 26. KemichiOhmae, The Borderless World (London: Harper Business, 1990).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    What is the main idea of this article? This article explains the relationship of the states to one another and to the national government.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    HU4640 Project Part1

    • 1650 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kavalski, E. (2015). Encounters with World Affairs An Introduction to International Relations. (Online-Ausg. ed.). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nationalism- built on “we”, common culture, history and language, defines us as a nation, also defined in who we are NOT, opposition, contradistinction to others…

    • 3156 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sst 1 Task 1 Wgu

    • 2714 Words
    • 11 Pages

    To understand what a nation-state is, you must first understand what both a state and a nation truly are in today’s world. A state is an entity that is responsible for both the country and the country’s citizens. A state has predefined borders that lay out what land it controls and also has sovereignty to a ruling power. A nation is more of an idea as it reflects a culture of people having common factors amongst them that defines their country. When you combine the three elements that are between a state and a nation you get what we call a nation-state. So a modern nation-state has a defined territory that is sovereign and also has a culture that it reflects to the rest of the world that makes it unique.…

    • 2714 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Mingst, Karen and Jack Snyder. 2011. Essential Readings in World Politics. 4th Edition. New York: W. W. Norton…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Smith, Anthony. Nationalism and Modernism: A Critical Survey of Recent Theories of Nations and Nationalism. London: Routledge, 1998. Print.…

    • 3129 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fiery Nationalism

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nationalism is a doctrine invented in Europe at the beginning of the nineteenth century. It pretends to supply a criterion for the determination of the unit of population proper to enjoy a government exclusively its own, for the legitimate exercise of power in the state, and for the right organization of a society of states. Briefly, the doctrine holds that humanity is naturally divided into nations, that nations are known by certain characteristics which can be ascertained, and that the only legitimate type of government is national self-government.…

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many regard nationalism as a primarily European phenomenon that was introduced to the rest of the world later (Chattarjee 1993). Benedict Anderson defines a nation as, “an imagined political community… both inherently limited and sovereign,” (1991). Nations are chiefly the result of economic forces, rather than cultural and religious biases.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Taking a closer look at the first concept, we can see that Nation-State is comprised of two powerful words. The Nation is defined as an entity that shares a common culture and people of the same race and ethnicity. On the other hand, State refers to an entity that is bounded by a certain geographical location, and abides by the same politics. In combining these two terms, a new concept is derived. A Nation State generally refers to a form of state that develops its legitimacy from operating as a sovereign entity for a nation as well as a sovereign territorial unit (1). In short, a Nation State is generally defined as a state or a country that is determined by certain geographical borders, and citizens who come from the same cultural background or are of the same race. In addition to this, citizens within a Nation State speak the same language, follow the same religion, and share common cultural values and beliefs (2).…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The term ‘state’ may be interpreted from various perspectives. It is often said that it is Thomas Hobbes, a famous realist, who invented and defined the term ‘state’ (Creveld, 1999). Hobbes (1660; cited in Korab-Karpowicz, 2013) discusses that states ‘for their own security en-large their dominions upon fear of invasion or assistance that may be given to invaders’. Thus, realists consider the state is a rational structure seeking to maximize power and national interest within both domestic and foreign policies. A famous German idealist Max Weber defines state as a combination of institutions possessing a monopoly on rule making and the legal em-ployment of military force within a limited territory (Calhoun, 2002).…

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    [ 5 ]. Calhoun, C. (1993). Nationalism and Ethnicity. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 19, p. 211 - 239…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Frieden, Jeffry A. 2007. Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century. New…

    • 2637 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Hastings, Adrian, The Construction of Nationhood: Ethnicity, Religion and Nationalism (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997)…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    It would seem a self-evident claim that national interest must play a significant part, if not a central one, in the formation of any state's foreign policy. This claim could be made because it would appear natural that the role of the state, in any situation, is primarily to further the interests of the society and people that it represents. This is the basis of its legitimacy and the reason of its very existence. This paper will explore the extent to which it can be said that states pursue national interests in their foreign policy formation, regardless of whether the outcome of the foreign policy pursued does in fact lead to benefits or advantages created for the national population in question. Foreign policies examined over the course of this paper will include economic policy, national security policy, and policies that fall under the category of humanitarian intervention in other countries. It will be argued that for the majority of the time, and in most situations (but certainly not all situations), foreign policy seeks to benefit the national government responsible for its creation, and the national society that it represents. In this sense, national interest can indeed be said to be an important and omnipresent factor in the considerations of foreign policy creation.…

    • 3858 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kenichi Ohmae, author of The End of the Nation State, also opines that the need for a nation-state has largely waned as the information age revolutionized business and international politics. His provocative thesis draws logic from the observation that the Cold War is over and that the financial flows around the world are no longer controlled by governments.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays