Preview

Flip-Flopping On Free Speech Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
212 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Flip-Flopping On Free Speech Analysis
"Flip-Flopping on Free Speech" basically detailed the history of free speech and opposition to it on campuses in America, and how our modern conflict on campuses (and in the NFL) evolved from that. The most interesting part, to me, was the articulation of the “no podium” mindset, where free speech doesn’t entail furnishing a podium for the speaker. Before that, I had never heard a coherent argument against “free speech” on campuses. That’s not to say that I agree with that mindset. I think capitalism, as in most cases, should be the driving factor in what speech is allowed where. If people will pay to watch a speech, then the speaker and speech should be allowed. If students are opposed to speech, they ought to protest by not paying their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    For my presentation, I reported on the Falwell vs. Flynt lawsuit, which was based upon the extent to which Americans have freedom of expression. An important aspect of this case was the dissimilarity of the two men involved: Jerry Falwell and Larry Flynt. Jerry Falwell was an important religious leader of the time. He was a radio evangelist, leader of a religious group called the moral majority, and voted 2nd most influential person in America (the first being the president). Falwell represented a pure America, a decent society in which its members were committed to moral standards. Larry Flynt was his complete opposite. Flynt was editor of the infamous Hustler…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Everyone has a freedom of speech, but others should not try to stop others from exercising their rights. A person can’t say the other is wrong or fight a person to join their side or that their side is right. A person can try to use facts and try to educate a person of their viewpoint. People are not entitled to have their viewpoints be received by people. A person does not have to agree with you on your viewpoint. You can’t change a viewpoint of another. People have their own ways of…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus”, the author, Derek Bok shows how expressing yourself falls under the First Amendment, whether it is on a private college campus or public college campus. He further explains that just because it is protected by law does not mean that it is “right, proper, or civil. Bok goes on to show how censoring freedom of speech would cause people to “test the limits” to gain more attention than is needed and if dealt with in the proper manner, behaviors such as displaying a Confederate flag or a swastika in rebuttal of the flag can be avoided. Freedom of expression is a right and should not…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article talked about how the students of UC Berkeley were protesting against a speech being given at their school, and how the sponsors of this group were forced to pay $15,000 in security fees. Then on top of that fee the school paid an additional $600,000 to create cemented barriers and have armed forces on campus during the meeting. Personally I feel these precautions were unnecessary however due to the way students were reacting it had to be done. Another subject brought up in the article was the fact that 44 percent of students said that the First Amendment does not protect "hate speech", 51 percent said that they would be in favor of students speaking out against a speaker "known for making offensive and hurtful statements" and 19 percent of students said the use of violence against controversial speakers is acceptable. This information frustrates me because freedom of speech is black and white, personal opinions shouldn’t interfere with our rights.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Minder, Raphael. "Crackdowns on Free Speech Rise Across a Europe Wary of Terror." The New…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some universities, such as Texas Tech, have taken down their designated free-speech zones. Public places that still have free-speech zones have many rules on them. Just to be able to use one of the “zones”, a person has to go through many levels of clearance and review. An argument to that is that free speech zones give people the rights that they want if they try hard enough. If a person really wants to speak their mind in a public place, they should not mind going through the supplements. Free speech zones are futile because they are so limiting that they are not “free” zones…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The eagle symbolizes our freedom and the strength we have as U.S citizens.The eagle shows that we can achieve great thing if we try.The unbalance scales with the words,Miranda Rights More Than Word shows that our rights are more than just words and that we are protected by those rights. Our rights are here to protect us from interrogations because we have the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. When we are questioned by the police we do not have to answer and the police can not force us to answer questions and or to…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To summarize, the censoring of free speech due to ludicrous NDA’s, on college campuses, and by social media are abridging a fundamental freedom. As…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Citizens United Case

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Wu, T. (2010). The Future of Free Speech. Chronicle of Higher Education, 57 (13), B4-B5.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1959 a documentary was produced entitled The Hate that Hate Produced which took a look at the Islamic nation and their feelings towards white people. The program was televised and broadcasted over New York television stations for the entire city to see. Malcolm X wanted to go ahead with the broadcasting of the program but Elijah Muhammad was a bit more reluctant. He felt that this would bring unwarranted attention toward the nation Islam and he felt it would be counterproductive to their cause. Malcolm however felt that this would be a great way to expose the nation of Islam and invite new members who felt they did not want to join the ongoing civil rights movement. Muhammad reluctantly agreed to the broadcast, but this would be the begging of the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people can protest as much as they want but it must not disturb the state of calm in the state. Limits to rights defuses any potential harm that can happen although there is criticism indeed. There are many types of speeches each can be allowed with limited aspects in a school the rules are simple behave and do not cause a disturbance. In the Tinker V. Des Moines cases a group of kids wore the armbands that was controversial to some member of the faculty. The students accused the school of infringing their 1st Amendment rights. The students were simply stating their own opinion for themselves although it may have disrupted student it did not stop the educational process. The rights of students is very limited punishments are announced…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1st Amendment

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For Instance, if the public was not able to possess freedom of speech than people would be force to be fastidious about the things they say. Politics, Speech in the classroom, Speech related to college and university governance, or Research related speech are all prime examples of why higher education is critical to the first amendment and freedom of speech. Even faculty members see continuing aggressive challenges to what they are allowed to say publicly or through an email privately. If you ask me, faculty members, academic professionals, or anyone should have a right to freely express themselves both in the classroom and externally because we all play an important role in providing necessary criticism, insight and invention to society. Ineffective or bad communication is equivalent to not exhibiting your opinions.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Freedom of speech is one that can change a country and has the ability to influence a large audience. Newspapers are very powerful in this way. A newspaper has the power to; scare, relax give hope, inspire and much more. They have the power to change.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Point #1: Safe-spaces take away from higher education. According to article, On Safety and Safe Spaces by Matthew Pratt Guterl hereby states,”A vocal handful of faculty members worry that their free speech -- or, on a lower frequency, their academic freedom -- is under siege.” Point #2: Trigger warnings and safespaces causes pressure at colleges. One billionaire businessman named Michael Bloomberg commented at a commencement speech at the University of Michigan by saying,” The fact that some university boards and administrations now bow to pressure and shield students from these ideas through ‘safe spaces,’ ‘code words,’ and ‘trigger warnings’ is, in my view, a terrible mistake,” Bloomberg said to a chorus of cheers. “The whole purpose of college is to learn how to deal with difficult situations – not run away from them” (Bellware). Point #3: Students do not have any authority, therefore, the college/university does. University of Chicago's letter says,” "we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces’ where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own." And, if you’ve watched students at other campuses, the dean warns, don’t get any crazy ideas about protesting invited speakers: "we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial." And, for the love of Milton Friedman, "Our commitment to academic…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The idea of ‘freedom from fear” is still the same, the perspectives from both presidents’ show similar beliefs in the security and the future of the country. Both presidents believe in the well-being of the country and everyone who is in it and they both see everyone as one. Their speeches show goals and hope that they have to make sure everyone feels safe. They want the country to live fear free during the times of these speeches. Though they may have similar beliefs how they choose to address their beliefs seem to differ.…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays