Preview

Federalists vs Whigs

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
989 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalists vs Whigs
Although historically represented as distinct parties, the Federalists and the Whigs in fact shared a common political ideology, represented many of the same interest groups and proposed similar programs and policies. Assess this.
Although the Whig party surfaced forty years after the Federalist party had died out, the two separate parties held many of the same ideals, and catered to many of the same constituents, causing these two parties to be more similar in history than different. The Federalist party was established originally to support the creation of a strong national government, after the Articles of Confederation were created in 1781. This party was led by Alexander Hamilton, whom being a well-educated and wealthy man himself, was followed in part by men of the same standards and social class.
One of the main ideas of the Federalist party was that of a "loose interpretation" of the constitution.(Garraty) This loose interpretation was used in determining the meaning of the elastic clause placed in the constitution. The federalist believed that because it would take hundreds of years to write down everything the U.S. government could do, the elastic clause was created. This clause allowed for the creation and addition of all things "necessary and proper" as needed by the national government. The federalists used this clause in the case of the National Bank. The opposing side, the Anti-Federalists led by Thomas Jefferson, believed that the bank was unconstitutional, because it was not specified in the constitution. The Federalists on the other hand deemed the bank to be "necessary and proper" to the government in order for it to run smoothly. The Federalists won out in the end and a national bank was created. Hamilton's financial system settled the problems caused by the revolutionary war, and the discrepancies between states and national governments rights when it came to taxation.
The Federalists were largely wealthy, aristocratic men, originating

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton founded the Federalists, which lasted for 24 years. The Federalists can be viewed as being the one that controls the Federal government, until in 1801 when they were no longer control. The Federalists were known to be built on a network of supporters who supported Alexander Hamilton fiscal policies. The supporters were known to be wealthy and aristocratic people. To illustrate, his supporters were Northern businessmen, large land owners, merchants, and bankers. The supporters eventually grew into Federalist Party, because of the strong nationalistic government that the Democratic-Republicans did not have. The Federalists believed in banks because of Alexander Humiliation who came up with the idea. In addition, the Federalist had Hamilton and James Madison who supported the Constitution. However, Madison agreed with certain points that the Democratic-Republicans had introduced, which made him switched over from the Federalists. Although, when he was in the Federalists party Madison stated “that he agrees with the constitution to secure the American people rights” (Foner, “Voices of Freedom”…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalists believed in a strong central government. They supported the Constitution, central banking and financial policies as a way to cure the economy. They wished to depend on the nation, rather than the state, to provide security and counsel. Most Federalists were artisans, merchants and large farm owners.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Doc. 6) They wanted to fix the constitution, because there were many things that needed to be fixed, so we could have a stronger government. The Federalist were afraid that the United States would have bad things happen and they were trying to prevent it from happening. (Doc. 4) Although the Anti-Federalist had their own beliefs about the constitution.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federal Government

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Then, Washington's secretary, Alexander Hamilton, goes against Thomas Jefferson to say and back up his view that the National Bank was constitutional. Washington, along with Adams, stood by this notion throughout their respective terms. This also increased the idea that the federal government had authority. Since Jefferson was preaching that the constitution should be interpreted strictly and therefore, the bank was not constitutional, and both Washington and Adams went against him openly on this idea, this showed the country that the federal government had power and it gave them more authority.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two main political parties in early America, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, fought many ideological and political battles from 1790 to 1810. Conflicts between these two parties grew out of their opposing ideologies the Democratic-Republicans supported states rights and a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, whereas the Federalists favored a strong central government and a broader interpretation of the Constitution. However there are more than 3 major topics that I could talk about involving the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans between the years 1789 and 1812. Some of the topics are boring and some of the topics are pretty interesting.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1998 Dbq Essay

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Following the making of the Constitution, James Madison brought forth the warning of political factions or parties as we know today in one of his many inputs into the Federalist Papers. As the Constitution was offered among the states to be ratified, two groups rose in effect of differing opinions on the document, and these two groups were known as the supporters, Federalists, and the opposition, Antifederalists. After eventual political compromise and the beginning of a new government, these parties did not disappear, yet instead became much stronger. In one corner stood the Federalists who believed in broad constructionism of the Constitution and used it to enlarge the size of the national government and its’ powers. In the other corner stood the Antifederalists who soon became the Democratic-Republicans, and in opposition to the Federalist believed in a strict constructionism of the Constitution and often supporting the power of the state and its’ independence.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Republican side As new problems arose facing the new nation, many different views toward the new conflicts developed. Initially, Hamilton acted aggressively to deal with the new republic's financial troubles with proposals to fund the national debt, create a central banking system and uniform currency, and promote manufacturing with a high protective tariff. Jefferson opposed these policies, objecting to the concentration of power in the hands of bankers and currency speculators. Jefferson believed that an economy dominated by small farmers, not manufacturers, would best preserve republican values. Hamilton believed in a strong central government while Jefferson believed in States’ Rights. Hamilton believed, “United States becoming a commercial and industrial empire, a world power remarkable for its ability to balance individual freedom with government power” (Tindall). Jefferson believed that an agriculture based society would better protect the civil liberties of the Americans. He feared that the growth of cities would enrich the aristocracy and widen divisions between the rich and poor, just as it has today.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are a few different reasons for the rise of political parties in the 1790’s, but the main reason is people had different views. There were many disagreements on the way that things should be interpreted from the constitution. There were two different parties, the Federalist and the Democratic Republicans.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During this confusing time of a new government finally in power, political parties also came about. By the election of John Adams, two factions had arisen with very different political values. The Republicans were led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The Federalists were guided by Alexander Hamilton and counted President John Adams among their members.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ Essay Before Alexander's proposal for a National Bank, the United States had no place where to store and save their money. The country didnt have a stable economy and needed improvemt in handling the financial business of the United States. By establishing a national bank, the country woould be able to establish financial order, clarity and precedence in and of the newly formed Unted States. It will also establish credidt, both in country and overseas, for the new nation. And finally it was to resolve the issue of the flat currency, which was issued by the Continental congress immediatley prior to and during the United States Revolutionary War. Although he saw a good future with having a National Bank, Jefferson disagreed completly. The secretary of StateThomas Jefferson and Representative James Madison we opposed, in which they claimed that the bank was unconstitutional, and that it only benefited merchants and investores at the expense of the majority of the population. Like most Southern members of Congress, they believed that it would only benefit business interest in the commercial north, not the southern agricultural interest. Also they stated that the creation of a bank violated the Constitution, which specifically stated that the congress was to regulate weights and measures and issue coined money, instead of bills of credit. A strict interpretation of the constitution states that the government those powers specifically granted to it by the Constitution, and a loose interpretation of the constitution positis that the government powers that are not specifically denied to it by the constituion. Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation of the constitution while Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation of the constitution. The chartering of the First Bank of the United States by the U.S Congress was indeed constitional since it depends on how you interpreate the Constitution.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists, which were originally led by Alexander Hamilton for his opposition to the Democratic Republicans, stressed the need for order, authority, and regularity in the political world. They believed in the idea of a broad interpretation of the Constitution. Northern merchants and commercially oriented farmers tended to form part of this faction; Americans of English stock also conformed the Federal party. Unlike Republicans, thy had no grassroots political organization and emphasized poorly on involving ordinary people in government. One of their most important issues was the great debt that America was going through. Alexander Hamilton saw this situation and proposed that Congress assumes outstanding state debts, combine them with national obligations and pay interests. His aim was to expand the financial research of the U.S, government and reduce economic power of the states. This was opposed by James…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists vs Jeffersoneans With respect to the federal Constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. As history dictates, this is found to be substantially accurate. As the colonies of America further widened the gap with their mother country and began to develop into a successful democratic nation, numerous political changes occurred. With this gap, a democracy began to emerge in the form of two political parties. These were the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The parties came to be characterized by certain beliefs, and the validity of those principles would come to be questioned during the Jefferson and Madison presidencies. During the time period from 1801 to 1817 the Jeffersonian Republicans, led by presidents Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, would often contradict their values and employ the Federalist ideals in regards to domestic affairs and foreign policy.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dfkskfhsfhjkdf

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian movements also provided different interpretations of the Constitution. Jefferson believed that there should be a very literal interpretation of the document, but Hamilton believed it could be more loosely interpreted. Hamilton believed there were some powers the president had that were implied. Jefferson did not like this way of thinking. The creation of the national bank created much controversy involving the interpretation of the Constitution. The Constitution never explicitly stated that the federal government had the power to form the bank. However, Hamilton claimed that under the Elastic clause the government had the authority to create the bank. Jefferson says that there is nothing necessary about a national bank. Hamilton’s argument is that the federal government has the power to print and coin money, so they must have a national bank in order to maintain the economic stability of the United States. Though Jefferson does not believe in Hamilton’s loose interpretation, he does use it to his advantage after the Louisiana Purchase. When the Louisiana territory is made available to the United States at such a low price, Jefferson feels that he much purchase the land. However, Jefferson has overstepped his constitutional authority with the purchase. Therefore, he uses Hamilton’s “implied” powers and gets the Senate to…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The followers of both Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton experienced a lengthy battle in the year of 1791. This conflict involved the National Bank being established and the Jeffersonians and Federalists going head to head. Hamilton proposed a Bank of the United States, taking the Bank of England as his model. In this bank the central government not only would have a convenient strongbox, but federal funds would stimulate business by remaining in circulation. The bank would also print the needed paper money and provide a stable national currency. Jefferson argued against the bank and he insisted that in the Constitution, there was no specific authorization for such a bank. He believed that all powers not specifically granted to the central government were reserved to the states, while Hamilton was convinced of the opposite. Jefferson concluded that the states, not Congress, had the power to charter banks. Believing that the Constitution should be interpreted literally, Jefferson and his states’ rights followers embraced the theory of “strict construction.’’ In contrast, Hamilton believed that what the Constitution did not forbid it permitted, yet Jefferson generally believed that what it did not permit it forbade. Alexander Hamilton then presented a brilliantly reasoned reply to Jefferson’s arguments to President Washington. He explained the clause of the Constitution that states that Congress may pass any laws “necessary and proper’’ to carry out the powers vested in the various government agencies. Hamilton also argued that establishing a national bank would be not only proper but necessary, as well. He and his federalist followers supported the theory of “loose construction’’ by invoking the “elastic clause’’ of the…

    • 381 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hamilton v jefferson

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gonzalez, Nathaly Per. 3 Essay 1: Alexander Hamilton vs. Thomas Jefferson Everywhere in American history, there are differences in ideas on how to run a country. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were no exception while they were members of George Washington’s cabinet. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton both had opposite views on how to run the country. Jefferson was the Secretary of State and an Anti-Federalist and Hamilton was Treasure of State and a Federalist making them opposite political parties and hating each other. The Federalist were a group of wealthy people and pro strong federal power, on the other hand anti-Federalist were pro protecting the state and equality for all people. Both these men wanted to run the country in the way of their political party. Both men had similar and opposing views on the Constitution, economic issues, and individual rights for people. The opposing views between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson led to the separation of the political parties.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays