Family Communication

Topics: Family, Interpersonal relationship, Communication Pages: 9 (3424 words) Published: October 11, 2012
Final Paper
Introduction
In today’s society many families communication has become a burning issue. Families spend most of their time in communicating, for the execution of routine activities everyone needs assistance and support from others. Then communication process starts, no one can communicate alone. There‘s always a sender and one or more receivers. Communication is a source of delivering messages from one to another. Through communication people share their ideas, feelings, thoughts and emotions. Communication plays a vital role in the working in families. Family Systems theory attempts to explain a way of explaining family interactions. It’s also a way of analyzing the way families communicates with one another.

Family systems have many different systems properties. These properties include wholeness, Interdependence, Non- Summaitry, Openness/closeness, homeostasis, morphogenesis and Equifinality. Social Construction Theory is a theoretical perspective that centers upon the importance of meanings from human behavior. (Turner & West, 2006 pg.26). This theory contributes a focus on the meaning-making function of communication that is lacking in the systems explanation. Relational Dialectics Theory refers to the book titled A Handbook of Personal Relationships, edited by Steve Duck. The title "A Dialectical Perspective on Communication Strategies in Relationship Development," written by Lesile Baxter, presents the basic strategies for an ideal relationship. The theories in which Baxter discusses describe the communication actions that a couple must use to establish, maintain, and dissolve their personal relationships. In this paper it will explain the different perspectives on family communication. Relationship:

Family Systems attempt to explain a way of explaining family interactions. It’s also a way of analyzing the way families communicates with one another. Family systems have many different systems properties. These properties include wholeness, Interdependence, Non- Summaitry, Openness/closeness, homeostasis, morphogenesis and Equifinality. Out of the six properties I will only discuss wholeness and interdependence. These are the ones fit my family well. In this paper I will discuss the different systems and boundaries that relate to my family. Next I will discuss suprasystems and “Who’s in” and “Who’s out” approach. First, wholeness is defined as when a family is not simply of its members added together. It also can be referred as to the idea that a system cannot be fully comphrended by a study of its individual’s parts in isolation from one another. When I talk about the wholeness system within my family many other families think we are a very close family, but I reality we are very distant with each other. For example, when others see my family in public the will consider us as being family- oriented, caring and supportive of each other. In reality we are very distant; everyone in my family is not supportive of anyone’s goals or achievements. Each person in my family has their own personalities on life and how they want others to perceive them in public. Most of my family members love to be around people who are negative instead of positive. For as myself, I would personally say that I always hung around positive people. I have to keep my reputation, being in college has helped me to understand the value of your own reputation. Interdependence is defined as systems thinking holding that the behaviors of systems members’ co-construct the system and all members are affected by shifts and changes. The interdependence system is where my family is the strongest. For example, in 2010 while I was working at Dollar General as assistant manager. A life threatening situation occurred; I thought February 07, 2010 was the last day of my life. I was held at gunpoint and was demanded to give the robber all the money out of the safe. After giving the robber all the money, he still had the gun point to my...

Cited: Baxter, Lesile A. "A Dialectical Perspective on Communication Strategies for Relationship Development," in A Handbook of Personal Relationships. Ed. Steve Duck. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1988. 257-272.
Griffin, Em. A First Look at Communication Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
Turner, L. H. & West, R. (2006). Perspectives on Family Communication. NY: McGraw-Hill
Summary
Reflecting back to the different theories that were discussed in this paper. It has opened made me look at things differently, how my family communicate with each other. I have learned that not one family is perfect. Although they might encounter some conflicts power struggles or whatever the case maybe. Everyone families have some type of tensions between them. I have also learned that communication is vital in any family, because there are a lot of misunderstandings with families who do not communicate with each other. Conflict and misunderstandings can make it hard for a family to function as a unit. How each member relates to the others affects how the group functions as a whole, as well as how each member functions as an individual. Family sessions are intended to improve interactions between group members through the use of successful communication skills. What I find to be most interesting is that how my family uses the interdependence approach of the family systems theory. It took for someone to put a gun to my head for them to communicate with me. I felt so hurt by that because we should have a better communication system every day. Something else I learned was how families considered who are in there and family and who is not. I found this to be very interesting because my family considers my uncle and brother in this approach simply because of their drug addiction. I feel like we are all family, this is where we could improve by helping them seek help. While doing my genogram it was very interesting because our communication systems are not good at all. For Example, in my genogram single parenting is the dominant factor here. Although single parenting families support may seems to be a little vague. My family has strong background of making ends meet. Cohabitation exists a lot in my family. My grandmother communicates more with my aunt Versie more than she does any of other children. Carlester, Sandra and Sheila are very close to each. Even though they do not communicate with each on a regular basis but they are closer than any of their siblings. When we talk about distance my whole family is distant toward one another. When a death or something tragic in my family we all come together. My family is difficult to deal with. Family is important. It takes commitment and hard work to improve family relationships. With all the negative influences around us, we struggle to hold our families together. But it 's a battle that is well worth it. Taking this course and writing papers has truly has given me a broader perceptive on my family and how I can use the different theories to help my family.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Family Essay
  • Interpersonal Communication in Essay
  • Interpersonal Communication Relationship Analysis Essay
  • Functionalism in Family Essay
  • Interpersonal Communication Essay
  • Family Story Essay
  • Essay about Communication Competence
  • Communications Theories Paper

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free