Preview

Explain why Richard, Duke of Gloucester made himself King in 1483?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
548 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain why Richard, Duke of Gloucester made himself King in 1483?
Explain why Richard Duke of Gloucester made himself King in 1483?

England in mid-1483 was an unstable and dangerous place. The King, Edward IV, had died, and turmoil raged as to who was to be his sons, King Edward V's Protector and rule as Regent until the King was old enough to rule by himself. Richard Plantagenet, Duke of Gloucester and Uncle to Edward V, became a contender for this right and eventually surpassed this ambition to rule as Regent and instead became King in his own right. There are several different reasons as to why Gloucester made himself King after his brothers death and in this essay I will explore them.

Edward IV had married Elizabeth Woodville a 15 years before he died and many disapproved of the marriage; considering the Woodvilles a large, common family which were nothing but a drain on resources. They were given large swathes of land and power during Edward's reign and came to be one of the most powerful Yorkist families. The Woodvilles were Parvenu and many of the established nobility, including Gloucester distrusted and ultimately didn't like the Woodvilles.

As we have previously seen with Kings such as Henry VI, when a minor is born into power faction was guaranteed to ensue between those who wanted to rule. The new King Edward V was being tutored by Earl Rivers, the Queen's brother- he was a Woodville. Due to their power and standings with the new and previous King the Woodvilles were a threat to Gloucester. Gloucester didn't want them to be in control for the reasons I talked of earlier and in Stony Stratford on the 31st of April 1483, Gloucester and his ally Buckingham arrested Earl Rivers and his men as they attempted to transport Edward V to his coronation in London. His dislike of the Woodvilles was one of the reasons he made himself King- he could not allow a Parvenus family take what thought was rightfully his.

Another key reason is that Gloucester simply had the character and means to take such action- he was ruthless and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Legitimacy is the key to a successful kingship. If you can be perceived as an effective and legitimate ruler by the nobility, you will remain in power. This was especially important in the early period of the reign of Edward IV because the son of Henry VI, Edward of Westminster, was still alive until he was killed at the Battle of Tewkesbury on 4th May 1471. If Edward IV not establish the legitimacy in the minds of the nobles, then they could easily justify overthrowing the usurper because the son of the rightful king, Edward of Westminster, was still alive. Our extract shows us this attempt to legitimise Edward IV by delegitimising the overthrow of Richard II by saying that Henry IV took the throne through illegal…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Edward VI died in 1483, there was debate as to who was most suited to take up his position on the throne. It has been argued that Richard, Duke of Gloucester had himself set on usurping the throne from the rightful heir Edward V, as soon as his brother died. Others argue that it was never the case that his immediate wishes were to seize the throne; actions after his brother’s death led him to this decision. There is evidence for and against to support the principal statement.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry descended from John of Gaunt, through the latter's illicit affair with Catherine Swynford; although he was a Lancastrian, he gained the throne through personal battle. The Lancastrian victory at the Battle of Bosworth in 1485 left Richard III slain in the field, York ambitions routed and Henry proclaimed king. From the onset of his reign, Henry was determined to bring order to England after 85 years of civil war. His marriage to Elizabeth of York combined both the Lancaster and York factions within the Tudor line, eliminating further discord in regards to succession. He faced two insurrections during his reign, each centered around "pretenders" who claimed a closer dynastic link to the Plantagenets than Henry. Lambert Simnel posed as the Earl of Warwick, but his army was defeated and he was eventually pardoned and forced to work in the king's kitchen. Perkin Warbeck posed…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far did Richard III demonstrate the capacity to be a good king 1483-1485? (24 Marks)…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard, Duke of Gloucester always detested his brother Edward IV after his secret marriage to Elizabeth Woodville, as he was made to look a fool by him when he found out they was married. Furthermore, when society found out of this marriage, this almost put Gloucester at an advantage because in that century, the King was supposed to marry a person that would influence the Kingdom in a good way, not out of love. Nevertheless, Because of this, Gloucester revealed that it was rumoured that Edward IV was already married, when he was got married to Elizabeth Woodville. For this reason, the marriage was deemed illegitimate, thus making Edward V’s inheritance of the throne illegitimate. This was a very strong move from Gloucester, and ultimately, because of this, he gained the throne, and the power to…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The successes of Henry VIII can be seen in his ability to keep and gain power and the force of his military efforts.To determine if Henry’s rule was a success, we must define what success means in the context of a ruler. This argument identifies the goals set forth by Henry, and his ability to achieve these goals. It’s also worthwhile to note the state and legacy that his rule left upon England. The reasons we can call Henry VIII’s reign a success will be laid out in his personal, political, religious and military accomplishments while on the throne. Henry’s reign can be defined by his ability to indulge in his desires. Whether that was to take and hold power, spend money on luxuries and war, or to consume more food in his later years. He had a number of personal desires beyond living a life of luxury, namely to have an male heir to the throne. Despite troubling history of marriage, he was successful in not only producing one heir, but three: Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I.Henry was successful in using fear to make those seeking to undermine think…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1470 Edward IV’s rule was challenged by the former monarch that he had usurped, Henry VI, and one of the key reasons as to why he was able to overcome this challenge was due to his popularity as king. Edward had proved to be an able king who was also young, strong and handsome, which is severely juxtaposed to the monarch he had usurped, as Henry VI was old, a less than capable ruler and thought to be insane. This meant that not only his original usurpation of Henry in 1461 was considered more acceptable to England’s population as it was most likely going to better the country; it also meant that Henry’s usurpation of Edward in 1470 was especially unfavourable with the population. Another reason why Edward was able to overcome his challenge of usurpation was at that time France was very unpopular with England, which is unsurprising as it is said that ‘England’s national hobby was going to war with France’, and Henry VI’s wife, Margaret of Anjou was the French kings niece. This marriage alone would be enough to make Edward appear more favourable with the general population; however it seemed likely that if Edward had not usurped, an alliance between the two countries would proceed, which only served to support Edward’s campaign to get back on the throne. Nonetheless, the most damaging factor to the position of the opposition is most likely the circumstances that the Lancastrian house found themselves in as with the deaths of both their key supporter, the Earl of Warwick, at the Battle of Barnet and of the Lancastrian heir, Edward, Prince of Wales at Tewkesbury, the Lancastrian position was no longer considered viable. The popularity of Edward IV was not repeated with Richard III however, and this combined with the fact he usurped a king that was showing great…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the history of time, there have been many leaders of the world’s different civilizations. While each leader may have possessed different qualities: some strong, others weak; some righteous, others corrupt…each rule played an important part in shaping the culture of that civilization. Though not every civilization was governed by a leader that had a worldly impact, the rule of England under King Henry VIII, was one of great historical importance. Unlike many leaders of his time, Henry’s legacy was not forged under the motivation of power and greed, but by love and his desire to have a male heir. Henry VIII became the King of England in 1509 after the death of his father Henry VII. Like most kings Henry desired to have a male heir,…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    under-mighty king Henry who did not make the right decision between York and Somerset. The king is…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    II. The rest of the family sided with the Duke of York, who was a descendant of Edward III's son, Edmund of Langley. This started the War of the Roses,…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Deposition of Richard II, it is obvious that the English king was disliked by all. A list of his grievances was drawn up, citing all of his poor choices as king and the reasons why he should be dethroned. The number one cause of the hatred of him was “his evil rule, that is, he has given the goods and possession…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fling

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Edward V was the great-great-great-grandson of Edward III and the son of Edward IV, the previous king, therefore making him have a strong claim to the throne. When his father died he was only 12 years old and so people weren’t sure if he was ready to be king, or if he needed someone to watch over him. His uncle Richard Duke of Gloucester- later known as Richard III- was made protector and guardian of Edward which meant he partly controlled what Edward did. He wasn’t on the throne for very long and so didn’t have much of an influence during his reign. There was a brief conflict with the Woodville’s who were adamant they had more of a claim to the throne, but Richard had them arrested. Richard spread a rumour that Edward V was illegitimate to the throne which was why he needed a protector, however once Richard took the throne both Edward and his brother disappeared in the tower of London and were never seen again.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ageism in king Lear

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gloucester observes disastrous events occurring in the play, most notably the ones occurring in the kingdom. He notes that love can never last, friendships eventually break up, and brothers become enemies which eventually leads to chaotic behavior. Ultimately, these malicious acts break out into devastating events such as civil wars, the bond breaking between father and son, and lastly the betrayal of King Lear and his noble power. In addition to all of these spiteful acts, it is evident that ageism is also portrayed in the play about the King himself, especially at the end of scene one. The first sign of how ageism begins in the first act is King Lear’s debatable decision to divide up the kingdom between his three daughters, Goneril, Regan and Cordelia. Eventually, Lear’s unwise decision causes chaos and havoc throughout the family, leading to multiple conflicts such as the banishment of Cordelia and the insulting comments about Lear’s old age and judgement.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tudor dynasty experienced differing uncertainties throughout their reigns on the throne of England. From politics and war overseas, to succession difficulties. Each Monarch throughout early modern England faced conflicting challenges and hardships, nevertheless Henry VIII stands out among them all. Henry’s turbulent years on the throne presents an evolution throughout English society, culture, religion and politics, to name a few. Henry was not expected to become King, being only the third child of Henry VII, himself also an unexpected King, winning his throne on the battle field against Richard III in 1485. His early youth was not that of the first in line to the throne, due to the unexpected death of this elder brother Arthur, Henry…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays