Evaluate the Statement, “One Person's Terrorist Is Another Person's Freedom Fighter.”

Better Essays
Topics: Terrorism
Evaluate the statement, “One person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter.”
According to Dictionary.com, the definition of “terrorist” is “a person, usually a member of a group, who advocates terrorism or a person who frightens others.” As for the phase “freedom fighter”, it refers to “a person who battles against established forces of tyranny and dictatorship.”
In the Western media, and often in the world media “Terrorists” are always described as violent people, and enemies of world peace. However, are terrorist methods essentially evil? According to the society nowadays, most people would agree to this statement as the author, Gus Martin, in “Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues” said “Terrorism commonly evokes images of maximum violence against innocent victims carried out in the name of a higher cause.” He also raises the question “Are not terrorism is simply a matter of one’s point of view?” Everyone have values that worth fighting for, killing for or even dying for. Most would do whatever it takes to protect their values. Most would agree to the basic values such as freedom and liberty are indeed worth fighting for. “Terrorists” are human; they would act the same way as everyone else.
In theory, there are no right or wrong answers to much human behaviour; a lot of time, if you want to understand one’s action, you have to know their reasons; perhaps it’s like the phrase “where you stand depends on where you sit.” For example, if someone with a gun that is aiming at your head, is it not an act of terrorism? If the gun is aiming on an enemy’s head in the name of your freedom, how can it possibly be terrorism?
Things can always be looked at from two perspectives. For example, smoking and littering on transits are considered being socially unacceptable behaviours rather than fundamental evil. In other words, these acts are illegal because society has declared them to be wrong; they may not be immoral.
There are lots

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Introduction The terrorist attacks in America have since publicized controversial attitudes in understanding and defining terrorism. There is a misconception of terrorism as it was only in actuality brought to light after the attacks in America on 11 September 2001 (Best & Nocella, 2004); this has guided many to assume that terrorism arose in light of the 11 September attacks, when actually terrorism did not begin in 2001; nor is it restricted to extremists in the Middle East. Here is where much…

    • 3514 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Terrorism Abstract What defines terrorism or freedom fighting depends upon a number of factors. Motivation as a factor in defining terrorism or freedom fighting is particularly significant as it forms the basis of Macquarie’s dictionary definition, “someone who joins in organised resistance usually armed against the established government, or the domination of his or her country by a foreign power” . Therefore it can be stated that a freedom fighters goal is to liberate oppressed people from foreign…

    • 5133 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? The word terrorism carries a very negative connotation in the western world. The attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City, the Unabomber, and countless atrocities the modern news is plagued with frequently skews what terrorism is and what terrorists are. During the American Revolution, the colonist rebels used terrorist tactics to win the war and secure their freedom. They were considered freedom fighters, not terrorists. However, when opinions are taken…

    • 3117 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay EL&C Cause and Effect Emma van der Maas ICV1A Terrorist or freedom fighter Terrorists are evil and want only to destroy and terrorise the western society. They all have beards and see the Quran as their holy mean to convey this awful jihad (holy war). They have their ways and beliefs to justify their terrorist actions and they do not care about the people they hurt or kill. Or do they? Is the ‘western world’ not forgetting that we for centuries have excluded these…

    • 2121 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One Person's Response

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    | Ethical or Unethical | One Person’s Response | | Myrna ZCelaya | 1/22/2011 | The author explains ethical or unethical behavior in different scenarios relative to management in the corporate world. | Calling in sick when you really are not is unethical because on such short notice a replacement will be difficult, if at all, to find. Someone needs to do the job that you are hired to do with or without you. Everybody at one point or another gets ill and that is understandable…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being a terrorist or freedom fighter truly depends on which side you are. For example the Austro-Hungarians most likely thought Gavrilo Princip was a terrorist because he disturbed their rein of power, however to the Serbians, Gavrilo was most likely seen as a freedom fighter. Furthermore the best way to decide is to be an un-biased third party. First off looking at the definitions and looking at widely regarded terrorist attack such as 911, we look at why Gavrilo attacked. In 911 terrorists attack…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brown, some will debate over the fact that he was a freedom fighter or a terrorist. Some will say he is a terrorist because he killed so many people. Then there is the people who say he is a freedom fighter who vowed his life to end slavery even if it cost him his life. First let’s talk about how he is a freedom fighter. When John went into Harpers Ferry he could of just blew up the armory, destroying the town and killing many like a terrorist would have since their main motive is to cause fear to…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nelson Mandela - The Fight For Freedom Imagine living in your own country where drinking from the wrong water fountain could get you into jail. These are the types of dangers that a black South African, or also known as the ‘coloured’ person, could get into. The ‘coloured’ and the ‘non-coloured’ were forced to ride on separate trains, go to separate schools, and were even forced to sit on different benches. In 1913, 7.3% of the South African land is was given to the blacks, who take took up…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    was a terrorist ,and some believe that he is a freedom Fighter. My belief is that he was a freedom fighter ,and not a terrorist. He was not because none of his actions were meant to cause fear to anybody. His raid on Harpers Ferry was not a terrorist attack. His attack was not meant to cause fear. He just wanted the guns in the armory. He did not want anybody to die in the raid. That is what happened at Harpers Ferry and next is Pottawatomie. His killings at Pottawatomie were not terrorist attacks…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Brown: Terrorist or Freedom Fighter There are many people that think of Brown as a terrorist or freedom fighter. A lot of stuff he did was a freedom fighting kinds of things, while other people say he's a terrorist. So what I am really trying to find out id weather or not he's a freedom fighter or terrorist. John Brown fighting for a cause or not? He once said that God deemed him to free slaves. He's had people help him organize things and to get stuff to fight for what he believes in. Some…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays