Preview

Ethical Issues in the Pelican Brief

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1372 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Issues in the Pelican Brief
In the hit book, The Pelican Brief, John Grisham's depiction of lawyers who will do anything for money and their clients presents an interesting ethical dilemma. In the book, two Supreme Court justices are killed by a hired assassin, Khamel. FBI, CIA, and the press are working hard to find who the killer is. The only people who know the truth are attorneys from White and Blazevich, Nathaniel Jones (also known as Einstein), Jarreld Schwabe, Marty Velmano, and F. Sims Wakefield and their client, Victor Mattiece. The action commences when Darby Shaw writes a brief about who she thinks is responsible for the deaths of two Supreme Court Justices, Rosenberg and Jensen. She shows the document to Thomas Callahan, her professor and lover. He hands the brief over to his friend Gavin Verheek, he is special council of the FBI Director. That's the way the "Pelican Brief" goes the round through the FBI, the CIA and of course the White House. The president now has to restructure the Court because of Rosenberg and Jensen's death. That is Victor Mattiece's aim. He knows that the president will chose conservative justices who will vote for Mattiece’s plans of gaining the oil in Louisiana. Mattiece also becomes aware of the "Pelican Brief" and decides to kill everyone who is involved in it to keep his plans secret. He hires the killer "Khamel" to murder Darby Shaw and Thomas Callahan. The story develops as Victor Mattiece, as well as, White and Blazevich firm attempt through either illegal or unethical measures to hire someone to kill anyone who knows about the brief and could jeopardize their plans. It is a book, so it all ends up more-or-less happily-ever-after for the young girl and Grantham, the journalist, who meet on the island of St. Thomas after exposure of White and Blazevich and Victor Mattiece. Grantham helps Darby Shaw by publishing a story revealing involvement of White and Blazevich and Victor Mattiece in the death of the two Supreme Court Justices. However,


Cited: Grisham, John. The Pelican Brief. New York: Doubleday, 1992. Print. Miller, Roger LeRoy., and Mary S. Urisko. Paralegal Today: The Essentials. Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Cengage Learning, 2011. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The main interest of the work is in a character, Matt, whose son has just been murdered, and his conflict with the concept of revenge. Throughout the story Matt makes frequent mentions to his family that he wants to and should kill his son’s murderer but is just as frequently disturbed and uncertain at this notion. Matt is never described to the reader as a violent or murderous person. The story even mentions that he was a caring and concerned father by stating that “He had always been a fearful father: when his children were young, at the start of the summer he thought of them drowning in a pond or the sea, and he was relieved when he would come home in the evenings and they were there” (92). Matt is angry with himself because he feels he should have been able to protect his son, but was not able to, and “he lost Frank in a way no father expected to lose his son, and he felt that all the fears he had borne while they were growing up, and all the grief he had been afraid of, had backed up like a huge wave and struck him on the beach and swept him out to sea.” (94). Frank, Matt’s son, was also previously beaten by Richard Strout, the man who would later murder him for “making it” with Richard’s wife. Frank’s battery was described as “Before ten o’ clock one night Frank came home; he had driven to the hospital first and he walked into the living room with stitches over his right eye and both lips bright and swollen” (91). Matt has such a burden put on him with the death of his son, and the magnitude of that event causes him not being able to think about “any of the small pleasures he had earned, as he had earned what was now…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In John Grisham’s book, the Pelican Brief, he writes about oil drilling harming the brown pelican which the reader can connect with the oil spills that are affecting the pelican as well. In the book, two supreme court justices are murdered. Darby Shaw, a law school student, decides to try and crack the case. She writes a brief that plants the murders on a man who owns an oil drilling company. Before, he had been in a lawsuit with Green Fund, who was trying to prevent him from drilling in Louisiana because it was harming the brown pelican.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wendell Rohr

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This movie is about a woman’s husband who is shot and killed. Holding the gun manufacturers’ responsible for his death, she hires optimistic lawyer Wendell Rohr to help her win the case. A good man of principle, Wendell takes charge. On the defense team, another man will take charge: Rankin Fitch, a powerful and ruthless jury consultant riding high on his frequent successes. But in the middle of it all is the jury, which both Wendell and Rankin are determined to sway. But what they're about to discover, is that one man and one woman stand in their way. Nicholas Easter is one of the jurors and he's the one collaborating with Marlee, his girlfriend, on the final outcome of the case. She tries to play both the lawyer defending the widow, Wendall…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peltier Paper

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bob rodideau and darrell butler were found non - guilty in the participation on the shoot out because fear existed and could not be tied to the close - range shooting. With Leonard peltier, the united states presented the Canadian court with a letter signed by myrtle poor bear who said she was a girlfriend and saw him shoot the agents. Later myrtle said that the agents threatened her to sign. Also three teenagers testified against Mr. Peltier, and later admitted that federal bureau of investigation forced them to testify against peltier. Then federal bureau of investigation ballistics testified that a casing found near the agent's bodies matched the gun to peltier however, later a ballistics test proved that it didn't come from peltier. Unaware of all facts, the jury claimed peltier guilty. The judge Benson just sentenced him for two consecutive life terms.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom 302

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The book begins where the defendants begin their time at Cook County Criminal Courthouse, a courthouse that has about fifteen hundred prisoners pass through the door weekly. Bogira explains the step by step process that occurs before the defendant even gets to the courtroom in the prologue of the book. Here Bogira sets the plot for the rest of the book by introducing many defendants of different ages, races, and criminal backgrounds. He doesn’t go into too much detail with each, but makes sure the reader knows the…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Steve Arey and Terry Jordan were young, inexperienced lawyers who should have never even been considered for a capital case. Judge Persin, the presiding Judge in the case, however, decided on these two gentlemen because other more experienced lawyers refused to take the case because of the huge financial sacrifice it would require. Albeit public speculation that Judge Persin's previous profession as a prosecutor had led him to heavily favor the prosecution, his decision stood. The two prosecutors who Arey and Jordan would be opposed by were Mickey McGlothlin and Tom Scott. Both prosecutors had far more experience than the defense lawyers, but that didn't stop Judge Persin from appointing Arey and Jordan to the case. It was an obvious mismatch, intentional or not, and was just the beginning of many problems that would arise for the defendant's case.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    2) Kennedy appointed his brother (Robert) as Attorney General which put him at the head of the Justice Department. Their tactic was to use the law courts as a way of enforcing already…

    • 1324 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethical Vignette Paper 1

    • 1720 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the second case, confidentiality and the exception to confidentiality is discussed. The client in this case is a lady who was a longtime client of a therapist. The client was rear ended by a drunk driver. This client reportedly claimed having issues with sleeping, eating , and intimacy with her husband as a result of the accident in addition to developing anxiety and suffering from physical injuries. This client decided to sue as she had to increase her sessions to twice a week due to suffering from the accident. As a result, the lawyer of the presumably drunk driver subpoenaed her records of counseling. The client in this case waived her…

    • 1720 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    They had their first person involved in this touchy case and would use him to their advantage in any way they could. In addition to this important breakthrough, Alex Cross’ group takes down the husband of the women who started the whole case, “We all felt that Lizzie Connolly and her daughters had been through more than enough pain already. They didn’t need to see Brendan Connolly — Sphinx — arrested at the family house in Buckhead. They didn’t need to find out the awful truth about him like that.”(357). The author has done a wonderful keeping the reader updated, their is no doubt that he kept this in mind during writing.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scottsboro Boys Essay

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Despite his clashes with Callahan and his disgust with the corrupt Alabamian justice system, Leibowitz refused to retire from the case when given the opportunity. He argued that the boys were “his responsibility” (page 357). Leibowitz made it very clear when Chalmers wished to replace him with southern lawyers that he would not step down unless he made sure that the boys’ interests were safeguarded. This was noble of Leibowitz considering the physical, emotional, and mental toll that this trial took on…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Complexity

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages

    justices in complex cases in the desire of affecting a justice’s decision, and in turn,…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay the Civil Act Rights of all black people was violated by categorizing them as all being the same which is really and unethical act within itself. By taking the personal belief of one person and dehumanizing all black people based on their personal feelings toward one race. This is against the law, however is it sad to say; you can find it being used, say and implemented in the world today. Due to law, most of the time it is practiced behind closed doors, and in personal conversations between people who share the same beliefs.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Landmark Court Case

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Thomas (Oyez, paragraph 4). The case was completely in the hands of these people and…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The novel begins when a lawyer, named Utterton, hears of a young woman being trampled by an evil stranger named Dr. Hyde. To pay off the girl's…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durgin, Catherine R. "Getting Legal with Paralegals A Look at the State Regulations." Business Law Today 16.3 (2007). American Bar Association. Web. .…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays