Essay On Victor As A Monster In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

Throughout the novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley makes us question the idea and the definition of a monster. We have a picture painted in our heads of something that would hide under a bed or some spooky creature that resides deep in the woods or swamps. Mary Shelley makes us question ourselves and popular beliefs.
To no surprise, most everyone would say that, of course, Victor’s creation is a monster, and at times, he seems like nothing but that. But at other times, the creation is quite the contrary. In the beginning, the creation just wants acceptance, and he has known nothing but exile since his heart began beating. The creation asks Victor to create him a companion in the same way that Victor created him. This request shows us that he wants love and friendship like everyone does. Victor begins, and then abruptly stops and destroys his work in progress. The
You can’t tell what someone is like just by looking at him. Yes, you would definitely call Victor’s creation a monster if you saw him walking down the road, but would you call the average joe Victor a monster, also? They may not look alike, but they both have negative characteristics that make them appear to be a monster figure. In my perspective, Victor is more of the monster in this story. No, he didn’t kill anyone, but he abandoned his creation and left him lonely and in exile. Victor had a responsibility based upon these actions, but he neglected the emotional impact, and therefore many lives were destroyed due to his neglect. This affected him tremendously. Victor’s creation can be compared to Grendel in the story Grendel. The creation appears to be some murderous monster, but in reality, just wants acceptance and companions. Acceptance and companionship, things at the very core of humanity, were never considered by Victor. How could he possibly have ignored these basic needs as he moved further into his