Economist Milton Friedman argues that a business’ “responsibility…generally will be to make as much money as possible”. Friedman clearly argues against the belief that a business has a moral duty to its consumers and rathers that their responsibility is instead to its shareholders, and therefore act in their best interests. Thus, Friedman would argue in the Ford Pinto case, in which Ford decided to risk consumer’s health over recalling the Pinto model, costing shareholders profit revenue, that Ford had no moral duty to recall the car as it had no moral duty to its consumers.
On the other hand, businesses also have responsibility towards other stakeholder in the company, other than consumers. One of the stakeholders are the businesses employees. If a business had a priority to its consumers, his may negatively impact the business’ employees. From a Kantian ethical standpoint this would be immoral as Kantian ethical standpoint, this would be immoral as Kantian ethics argues that all humans, no matter their status in society. Therefore, if the moral duty to a business’ consumers involves a negative impact on another stake holder of the company; e.g. If reduced prices for the consumer comes at the expense of employment for a number of employees, then the company will be acting against the categorical imperative of regarding all rational beings as equal.
In contrast to this approach, a Utilitarian’s perspective would disagree with Kantian ethics and support the argument for a moral duty to its consumers, as a Utilitarian would believe that if the effects of prioritising consumers comes at the expense of negatively effecting a larger group of individuals, then a business’ moral duty lies with the largest effected group. In fact, Kantian Ethics even contrasts itself with its belief that one has an equal moral duty to all rational moral agents, therefore prioritising the consumers over other stakeholders would be immoral.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
← Businesspeople owe a duty to act ethically in the conduct of their affairs, and businesses owe a responsibility not to harm society…
- 10003 Words
- 41 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Donaldson, Thomas, Patricia Hogue. Werhane, and Zandt Joseph D. Van. Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2008. Print.…
- 2507 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Each person has a set of personal values and morals that they hold themselves accountable to, whether for religious reasons or the result of years of environmental conditioning. These standards of behavior often go above and beyond the laws set in place by government. Just like individuals, a business entity chooses a standard of moral behavior to uphold. A difficult task to undertake, considering businesses are comprised of people with varying behavioral standards, but a necessary one nonetheless. Businesses are required to act with a moral minimum, defined as the minimum degree of ethical behavior expected of a business, or more specifically, compliance with the law . Most businesses go above this moral minimum however, weighing decisions beyond profitability and legality, and analyzing what constitutes right and wrong behavior. With information rapidly available to investors, social responsibility is in constant check. Going above the standards set by law can actually increase profitability, ease capital attainment, and in turn, increase the stock price. In a world where environmental concern is mounting, businesses are being called to act righteously and hold itself to the highest standard: that of natural law. In this paper, the concept of moral minimum will be further developed through the work of Hart, a positive and natural law theorist, accompanied by an analysis of the responsibilities facing business today, specifically the standards they should hold themselves to.…
- 1382 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The ethical issues presented in this case are the different views that each individual has on how the idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR). This dispute is between Mr. Milton Friedman, John Mackey, and T.J. Rodgers; all of which has a different outlook on CSR. The definition of CSR refers to the responsibilities that business has to the society in which it operates and to those actions that a business can be held accountable. Most philosophers have come up with three different types of responsibilities that corporations can be held accountable for. The first and most important of the three is a corporation’s duty to not cause harm. If a corporation can avoid causing harm to society and consumers then they are almost obliged to do so even if it is not required by law. The second responsibility is the responsibility to prevent harm. In this situation a business would have the responsibility to prevent harm even if they were not the cause of this harm. Thirdly there is the responsibility to do good, which would involve charity work and volunteering.…
- 765 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Followed by, the normative theory that best supports the conclusion. Determination of the considerations for and the process of ethical business decision making to balance corporate and social responsibilities and address moral, economic, and legal concerns are presented. Analysis selected business situations using the predominant ethical theories, such as utilitarian, Kantian, and virtue ethics to guide ethical business decision making are also addressed.…
- 1761 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
This course will focus on issues and perspectives of right and wrong in American business. The course begins with a survey of philosophical approaches to ethics and morality and continues in an application of these approaches to real world cases drawn from the functional areas of business.…
- 4592 Words
- 20 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The writer here talks about a man named Kant who lived in the 18th Century and is best known for defending a version of the “respect for persons” principle which implies that any business practice that puts money on a par with people is immoral or unethical. Kant argued that the highest good was the goodwill. To act from a good will is to act from duty. Thus it is the intention behind an action rather than its consequences that makes that action good. The article goes on to focus on some of the implications of Kant’s three formulations of the fundamentals of ethics. Kant’s first formulation was that he believed every action has a maxim, we are to ask what would happen if the principle (maxim) of the action were a universal law. Would a world where everyone acted on that principle be possible? Kant uses an example where he focuses on the concept of lying promises, when adopted as a principle by everyone it is incoherent. The second formulation he focused on was to treat humanity in a person as an end and not for means merely and lastly he believes that organizations are composed of persons and given the nature of persons, organizational structures must treat the humanity in persons with dignity and respect. Kantian ethics sure had limitations, Kant had nothing to say about environmental ethics , lack of understanding on animal suffering and the biggest challenge Kantian ethics being too demanding yet kants moral philosophy has rich implications for business practice.…
- 727 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
One of the several topics covered in Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals is the issued of two shopkeepers. One shopkeeper is honest with his customers in order to maintain a positive reputation and improve profits. The second one is honest because he thinks it is right and exercises his respect for the moral law. The first shopkeeper is motivated to be honest by the rewards of a positive reputation and profit. The second is motivated by respect for morally right action. Taking these motivations into consideration from the standpoint of Kantian ethics, it is clear which shopkeeper is acting right.…
- 1091 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
3) Critically assess the view that businesses havea moral duty to put their consumers first…
- 158 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Bibliography: Barry V. & Shaw W. (2004) Moral Issues in Business. (9th Edition). “The Ford Pinto Case Study” pg.84. Wadsworth: Holly J. Allen…
- 1676 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
In order to make justification for the type of behaviours business managers have and to outline the appropriate actions they should take, many ethical theories have been developed since. There are three that best represent the key perspectives in this matter; Friedman’s Shareholder theory, Freeman’s Stakeholder theory and Heath’s Market Failure Model of business ethics (Heath). Each of them is the pillars of which many other theories are based on but have very different and opposite views. The Shareholder theory suggests that manager has fiduciary duties to the shareholders only and must maximize profits as long as the law permits. The Stakeholder theory on the other hand suggests that managers have fiduciary duties to all stakeholders whom are positively or negatively affected by the…
- 2229 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This paper will discuss ethical behavior in the business world. In particular, the question of what ethical behavior actually involves will be analyzed in depth. Ethics is a topic that can be discussed at length without reaching universal consensus, and this text will not be an exception. However, it should shed some light on the issue of ethical corporate behavior. The objectives and responsibilities of business will be covered, as well as the ethical obligations of various parties.…
- 2214 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In this essay, I am going to argue that we cannot rely on corporations to be ethical and responsible, however, we can always trust them to act in their perceived best interests and in many cases, this is concurrent with acting in an ethically and socially responsible manner. There are two main reasons for this outcome. Primarily, corporations are instruments to be used by typically self-centred individuals – they act predominantly in their own interest and to do so is to maximise the profits of the corporation. As I draw upon Shaw & Barry (2007), I will show that corporations are run by individuals with egoistic objectives, who despite their personal views, are often forced to run corporations with profitability as their primary and sometimes only purpose. Consequently, individuals and consumers are becoming more self-aware of the actions and consequences associated with their behaviour. Indeed, as I invoke upon Parker (2002), I will show that consumers can and often do sanction corporations who choose to engage in unethical activities. These two principles make it imperative for the executives who manage corporations to conduct their operations in an ethical and socially responsible manner if they seek to ensure the financial success of their organisations. I will elaborate on this further throughout the essay by initially explaining the rationale behind corporate decision making, then consequently on how consumers can strongly influence the way in which corporations act, and…
- 3308 Words
- 14 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Business ethics is concerned with how well a business treats its stakeholders and whether a business’s actions are seen as ethical. Within business ethics there are three approaches which could be adopted. The first approach is that a business’s main goal could be to maximise profits and nothing more, where the ethics of the business wouldn’t necessarily be important. This view is supported by Milton Friedman. Secondly, some ethicists believe that businesses have moral responsibility to their stakeholders whether that is the employees, consumers or the local community. Finally, the last approach is the social contract theory that is based on the ideas of John Rawls. This approach suggests that employees and other stakeholders are given a voice as to how a business operates. Some businesses are seen as ethical because they have an ethical code and they follow it. The most common example of a business that is ethical is The Body Shop. This business is seen as ethical because it is concerned with treating the environment and its employees well. On the other hand, some businesses can be seen as unethical because they use child labour as a form of cheap labour, a modern example of such a business is Primark. Virtue ethics suggest that for someone or something to be morally good and virtuous they have to possess the ‘good’ virtues. In the business world the virtues that are suggested to exist are courage, fairness, honesty and compassion. Aristotle said if we or a business have these virtues then we achieve our eudaimonia.…
- 1009 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In this essay, I will argue that Ford Motor Company’s business behavior was unethical as demonstrated in the Ford Pinto Case. Ford did not reveal all the facts to consumers about a harmful gas tank design in the Ford Pinto. They tried to justify their decision to sell an unsafe car by using a Cost-Benefit Analysis which determined it was cheaper to sell the cars without changing to a safer gas tank. The price of not fixing the gas tanks is human injuries and fatalities. By choosing not to make the Pinto a safer vehicle Ford placed a price on the head of every consumer. Ford’s primary concern was to maximize profits. Ford had a duty and ethical responsibility to customers to stop production once they knew of the evident dangers and take the necessary measures to eliminate them by redesigning the gas tank. I will discuss the Ford Pinto Case and the harm Ford Motor Company (FMC) caused by its inability to make decisions that competently respect the wellbeing and rights of people.…
- 1672 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays