Preview

Doctor Assisted Suicide Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
871 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Doctor Assisted Suicide Research Paper
Introduction
Physician-Assisted Suicide, also commonly known as Doctor Assisted Death , is the act of a Physician or Nurse Practitioner administrating or providing a substance to a patient, which ultimately results in their requested death . As of today, Canadians can rest easy knowing that they have the right to a Doctor Assisted Death, but this was not always the case. For decades, many Canadian citizens fought for their right to a Physician-Assisted Suicide. Many of these individuals had either a disease or disability that is described as “grievous and irremediable”, which refers to any disease or disability that causes enduring suffering that is intolerant for a person to live with . One famously known individual is Sue Rodriguez who suffered
…show more content…
Anyone suffering from ALS will experience a gradual deterioration of the nervous system and at some point will no longer able to swallow, speak, walk, or move . Aware of these outcomes, Sue Rodriguez decided to submit an application to the Supreme Court of British Columbia, and eventually the Supreme Court of Canada, where both times the courts ruled against her . Sue argued that s. 241 of the Criminal Code of Canada was invalid because it denied her right to security of the person under s.7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms . The Supreme Court of Canada ruled against her because they believed that by deeming s. 241 of the Criminal Code of Canada invalid would put vulnerable patients at risk . Sue Rodriguez died on February 12, 1994, when she committed suicide with the help of an unknown doctor . The question regarding, ‘whether or not Physician-Assisted Suicide is right?’ has sparked many controversial debates. This report will not only touch base with the fundamental ideas of Physician-Assisted Suicide but will also examine the current issues revolving around Doctor Assisted Death and its effects on the …show more content…
In doing so, a clear understanding of whether or not ‘Doctor Assisted Suicide is right?’ can be determined. This section of the report will take a look at four philosophers, as well as their own philosophies on the law in general. By doing this an accurate determination of how each philosopher would have viewed Physician-Assisted Suicide can be made. The four philosophers are Plato, Aristotle, John Locke, and Jeremy Bentham. Natural law is defined as a body of unchanging moral principles, right and wrong, which reflects how humans should act in their society . Postive law, on the other hand, is defined as any law that has been put in place by legislators, the court, or other institutions, these laws strive for the greatest good for the greatest amount of people in a country, this concept is called Utilitarianism and will be expanded upon later . These laws must be followed or else individuals who break the laws can face the consequences put forth by the lawmakers. Plato was a natural law philosopher who thought humans were social by nature and therefore an organized society was a natural institution . The major concept in Plato’s philosophy was the idea that society or the country

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia is a widely debated and controversial topic in our society. It is believed that the principle of PAS and euthanasia portrays, “merciful acts that deliver terminally ill patients from painful and protracted death” (page 477, column 2). In the paper, “Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Tragic View,” John D. Arras discusses the subject and states that while he agrees with patients making decisions, implementing laws supporting PAS and euthanasia is a huge threat to our social order. However, John D. Arras also concludes that he does not disapprove with the possibility of having a legislative policy in favor of PAS/euthanasia, only if there is “sufficient evidence of reliability of various safeguards” (page 477, column 2).…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sue Rodriguez

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sue Rodriguez, once a woman who was lively and healthy women much like the rest of us was given the horrible news that she had amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in early 1991 changing her life tremendously. Little did she know her fight for equality of life would create a milestone in Canadian Law. Sue Rodriguez fought long and hard to demand the right to assisted suicide, which at the time was illegal under the Criminal Code of Canada, being a punishable act for up to a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. Ms. Rodriguez argued that Section 241 (b) of the Criminal Code (which prohibits assisted suicide) violated her constitutional right to life, liberty and security of the person under S. 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Unfortunately both the British Columbia Supreme Court and the British Columbia Court of Appeal dismissed her application. Sue Rodriguez at her final attempt of trying to grant herself the right to assisted suicide appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, the verdict resulting in a five to four decision with the Supreme Court of Canada dismissing her appeal. In 1994, Ms. Rodriguez decided to take matters into her own hands, with the help of an anonymous physician Sue Rodriguez ended her life.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is obvious why this case and especially its verdict has caused such an uproar with ethicists and society. The ethical dilemma presented in this case is whether Canadian law has the authority to prohibit Sue Rodriguez the right to pursue physician assisted suicide as a way to end her life.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assisted suicide is mostly associated with doctors, whereby; a medical doctor intentionally makes the means available for a patient to kill him or herself. Enormous health challenges make patients contemplate suicide and do request their physicians to assist them make the suicide possible. Doctors can provide the means to death usually through an overdose of prescribed medication; hence, the individual dies because of a drug overdose rather than from natural causes (Battin, 1995). This is commonly referred to as physician-assisted suicide. However, assisted suicide is not an action primarily limited to physicians. Any other individual providing the means to death to a patient is also considered assisting in suicide (Battin, 1995).…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 2492 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In the medical field there are massive amounts of treatments for various diseases. Some treatments are going to help the patient feel more comfortable; however, some are going to counteract the problem, and others are going to help kill the patient. Physician assisted suicide is defined by medterms.com as “the voluntary termination of one 's own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician.” Any person wishing to undergo assisted suicide in Oregon must be at least 18 years of age and have a terminal illness. This illness must be within its final stages and leave the patient with less than six months to live. Within these six months a patient can request the treatment, but must orally request twice, and provide a written request once as well. In order to receive this treatment, however, a second physician must give a second opinion on the length the patient has to live. In her article, “Physician-Assisted Suicide: Compassionate Liberation or Murder?” Vicki Lachman talks about the option that patients have to request a lethal dosage of medication. She explores the moral conscience of nurses, the ethical and moral issues, and the legal issues that surround a patient’s request for lethal dosages.…

    • 2492 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia, formally known as mercy killing, is the act of intentionally causing the painless death of a sick person, rather than allowing that person to die naturally. In terms of a physician's actions, it can be passive in that a physician plays no direct role in the death of the person or it can be active in that the physician does something directly to cause the death (Yount, 2002). Euthanasia may also be formed into three types of act, which are voluntary, involuntary, and nonvoluntary. Voluntary involves killing the patient at his or her request. Involuntary occurs when the patient does not give consent, or refuses. Nonvoluntary is where the patient is not able to make the decision about their medical treatment so it is up to a third party to make the decision for them (Yount, 2002). Legalizing euthanasia would cause many complications because we are dealing with a very controversial issue that brings into focus some extremely powerful, conflicting, and competing values. Under the Canadian Criminal Code, active voluntary euthanasia is illegal and individuals can be convicted for 14 years for murder (Ogden & Young, 2000). Passive euthanasia has been legal because the courts have recognized the right of a patient to refuse and to terminate unwanted medical treatments. The question that remains today is whether legalizing active euthanasia in Canada could either benefit or harm not only the individuals involved, but also society as a whole.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The term euthanasia originated from the Greek word for "good death." It is the act or practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the deferment of medical treatment (Munson, 2012, p. 578). Many view euthanasia as simply bringing relief by alleviating pain and suffering. Euthanasia has been a long-standing ethical debate for decades in the United States. Active euthanasia is only legal in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. Assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland and in the United States in the states of Washington, Oregon and Montana (Angell). Several surveys indicate that roughly two thirds of the American public now support physician-assisted suicide, and more than half the doctors in the United States do too (Angell). Active voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia matter because they allow the patient or family to relieve them of pain and suffering, and to die with dignity and respect. In this paper I will argue that it is immoral and unethical to deny a patient the right to die and that active voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia should be a legal practice in the United States.…

    • 2255 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctor Assisted Suicide

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Civil rights and law have not always gone hand in hand, that is why it is an extremely refreshing victory for the people of Canada, that active, voluntary euthanasia is soon to be legal. This newfound outlook on doctor-assisted suicide, however, raises the question, what circumstances is euthanasia to be permitted under? Recently, a parliamentary report was published, suggesting 21 recommendations regarding doctor-assisted suicide. Although, all 21 recommendations are important in creating guidelines surrounding euthanasia, there are four particular ones that will be addressed in this work; including, whether or not euthanasia should only be available to those suffering from a terminal illness, whether or…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Physician Assisted Death

    • 2942 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Many of us have felt the pain of watching a loved one’s life slowly diminish in a hospital bed. Today, modern medicine and doctors can only go so far to care for terminally ill patients. Even with the knowledge of this country’s best medicine and most extraordinary doctors, many of the terminally ill suffer persistently; they become unhappy, and some are not able to fend for themselves in ways healthy individuals find to be easy and are able to do. The simple every day actions begin to be tremendous struggles such as eating, moving, and even communicating. In extreme cases, terminally ill patients may no longer find the will or strength to move forward. Physician-assisted death can be constructed to have reasonable laws, which still protect against its abuse and the value of human life, easing the patients suffering when nearing the end of their life. Physician-assisted death is ethical and is a compassionate response to unbearable suffering. Physicians should be required by law to help terminally ill patients, with no hope, which have a strong desire to end their lives.…

    • 2942 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is also called euthanasia. It is a highly debated topic on whether it should be legal or not. Some states have taken different stands on this question, some making it legal to do. I believe that every citizen who is suffering from a degenerative, painful or fatal condition, should have the right to decide if they want the option of a physician assisted suicide. I believe in a society such as ours we should all have the right to die with some kind of dignity.…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion, if a terminal patient lives in steady anguish, he or she should not be forbidden to peacefully end his or her life with a doctor’s aid. Living in pain and practically waiting for death to arrive is not the way a human should spend their last couple months of life. Citizens with an incurable disease that progressively worsens should be able to die with dignity. If not these patients will spend their last days with complete misery and worry that death is not near enough. States throughout the country and the government need to revise their beliefs about an assisted death and consider the amount of benefits it provides life-threatening patients. Overall, Physician-assisted suicide should be an option for patients in more than…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine being terminally ill and being told by a doctor that there is only have six months left to live and that those next six months will wither the body down to nothing through pain and suffering. Physician-assisted suicide could save many Americans from this nightmarish reality that terminally ill patients face today. If physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia was legal in the United States, months of suffering and a loss of dignity and autonomy could be spared. Therefore, physician-assisted suicide, in the style Oregon employs, should be legalized and available to suffering patients across the United…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    People in Canada are diagnosed with terminal illness’ every day. They know when they are going to die and often suffer until then. Why can’t patients diagnosed with a terminal illness be given the option to be euthanized? It would allow such patients to die painlessly and peacefully instead of having to suffer. While currently illegal in all but five areas of the world, assisted suicide and euthanasia are quickly becoming a more prevalent topic globally with more and more countries looking at making the move to legalize the acts. It has been legalized nationally in countries such as the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Belgium while also being legalized in the states of Oregon and Washington in the United States of America. The article from the New England Journal of Medicine, Redefining Physicians` Role in Assisted Dying by Lisa Lehmann, uses the state of Oregon as a basis for much of her research and probing into both sides of the argument behind euthanasia. Margaret Somerville, a world renown ethicist and academic known for some of her controversial views, also gives her own insight into the topic in the article Legalized Euthanasia Only a Breath Away, published by the Globe and Mail. Somerville bases much of her argument around personal opinions and strong beliefs. I will examine the merits and proposals brought forth by each author and compare them to each other.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument that has sent the world into a tailspin is whether or not people suffering from terminal or excruciatingly painful illness have the right to take their own lives by way of physician-assisted suicide. Proponents contend that what one does with one 's life is of no consequence to anyone else -- that it is humane to allow someone to be relieved of constant – if not unbearable – discomfort. On the other hand, critics claim that the act of euthanasia is nothing more than a fabricated form of murder. Indeed, both sides have pertinent points when it comes to understanding and assessing the conflict, but euthanasia supporters have a significantly stronger argument when considering the bigger picture. Clearly, physician-assisted suicide is not only the right thing to do for someone seeking such a decision, but it is ethical and humane for a physician to abide by the patient 's wish.…

    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The major claim of this editorial, is that legalized doctor-assisted suicide is euthanasia. We are asking for the right to decide though the court system, if an individual’s life is valuable or not. Some may claim we are just hiding or heartless nature and corrupt moral standards to justify our actions.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays