Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Discourse of the Method

Good Essays
1206 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discourse of the Method
3RD WRITING ASSIGNEMENT In a really famous “Discourse of the Method”, Descartes is basically teaching us how to think like a real philosopher, and giving us information about his education, sufficient rules of logic, moral code, and how these moments are shaping the founding of the Cogito. Descartes is trying to build a new foundation through the entire treatise, and demolish the old foundation. In the first part Descartes is talking about his opinion about education and good sense. He tells us how good sense is the best distributed thing in the world, and how he thinks that distinguishing the true from false, what is actually good sense or a reason, is equal in all of us. The only big difference is how we direct our thoughts along different path, and that is why we do not attend the same things. Descartes is also saying how education did not make of him what he accepted at first, so he is being disappointed in education. He said that he got nothing from being educated except that he increased the level of his ignorance how he was constantly beset by a lot of doubts and errors what made him think that education was useless. He is comparing education with traveling, saying that it is good to examine all the subjects related to theology, poetry, languages, mathematics, in order to know their true value and guard against because we can be deceived by them. Although he considers traveling better, too much traveling can make you a stranger in your own country, he says.
For Descartes, education was a kind of a benefit, but he thought that education could unclouded his mind. Traveling was something what he was supporting more, because his motive was to travel and learn from the world. He also believed that the most important thing is to study and master yourself, and to study the world. That is why he evaluated traveling much more than education. René thinks that traveling around the world brought him more success, than he could of have if he stayed in his country with his books. A really big part of René’s belief is that everything is in finding a reason and fighting merely probable. He connected mathematics with reasoning and merely probable with theology. René says in Discourse of the Method that he delighted in mathematics because of the certainty and evidence of its reasoning. He also mentions that people with the strongest reasoning are the most persuasive what make their thoughts clear and intelligible. On the other side he was fighting merely probable because he considered false everything what was merely probable. He gives us a really strong reason for that, explaining how people have more theories about God, and more than one of them can be true, but how all of them are merely probable, they are automatically false for him. In the second part, Descartes is saying how one genius is much greater than a group of them, explaining it through the instance of built buildings. More important thing in this part is how René sets down his own rules of logic. The first rule is never to accept anything as true, if you do not have an evident knowledge, which means that one should not jump on conclusions too early without an evident reason. This rules gives us the option to conclude thing only if we have an evident knowledge. Second rule is to always first break down your difficulties in as many parts as you can, and then solve them; that is a way to resolve them better. Once you resolve them partially, from piece to piece, you are going to be able to resolve the entire problem better and faster.
René’s third rule is to direct your thoughts in order according to the reason. You should start from the simplest one, moving to more complex, and finish with the most complex one, always taking a step by step. The last and the fourth rule is to avoid preconceptions, be comprehensive, and leave nothing out. This method René finds really effective for solving problems. Descartes also explains the provisional moral code through his four codes in the third part of the Discourse. His firs maxim is to obey the customs and rules of his country and his religion, and never take an extreme opinion. The second maxim is to be decisive in your actions, and stick with your decisions even if there are some doubts, with no regrets and remorse. The third maxim is to try to change and master himself, not the world. He says that he would rather change his desires that the order of the world. He also says that nothing is in our power except our thoughts, what makes us not allowed to want things that are deprived from us, and we should not regret the absence of that goods. René admits that it takes a long time to see everything in this light. He believes that in this lay the secret of some philosophers who in earlier times and poverty saw themselves richer, more powerful and happier than the other man because of the mastery of their thoughts. Being convinced that nothing is in your power except your thoughts, makes you not attracted to the other things. The last maxim Is to examine all the occupations in the world, and to try to choose the best one. Descartes decides not to say anything about other professions, because he thinks that reasoning and searching for the truth by using the method he prescribed for himself is the right call for him, how he was already engaged in that. The fourth part of the Method gives us Descarte’s proofs of the existence of the sould and of God. He explains how the nature of dreams and unreliability of the senses made him to become aware of his own process of thinking. This is how he came up with the conclusion, ”I think, therefore I exist”.

According to him, process of thinking makes you alive which means if you think, you exist. Thinking and doubting are two necessary conditions for existence. He said that there is nothing to assure him that this proposition is true, but the fact that in order to think you need to exist makes it true. Also according to this way of thinking, Descartes believes that all the things we consider clearly and distinctly are true. He also gives us example that in this situation mind only matters. He explains how he examined that even though he could pretend that he did not have a body, he could not pretend that he did not exist because his mind was still “alive”. Thinking does not require any place, body, or any material thing, you think, and that means that you exist. Really interesting thing Descartes is mentioning in this part is perfection and how only God is all-perfect and all-truthful. He is wondering how he can have a perfect idea if he is not a perfect human being, and from where are the ideas of perfection coming from. The only possibility to have it in himself was God, who put it into him by nature, he explains.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, there have been many individuals deserving of praise and admiration. These individuals were all admirable in their own regard. One of the most significant of these individuals was Rene Descartes. Rene Descartes was an admirable individual due to his contributions to philosophy, his remarkable findings in mathematics, and his explanations of the physical world that are still relevant today. Descartes came up with the philosophical arguments of Cartesian doubt, the Mind-Body problem, and Cartesian certainty. In regards to Mathematics, Descartes discovered numerous principles and theorems that paved the way for future discoveries in mathematics. His most notable findings included Cartesian Coordinates, Cartesian Geometry, and "Discourse on Method". In addition to this, Descartes had numerous explanations of the physical world. His most prominent explanations are the first modern formulation of laws of nature, theory of planetary motion, and the study of reflection and refraction of light.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes starts by rejecting all his beliefs, so that he would not be misleaded by any misconceptions from reaching the truth. He notices that by doubting all of his previous ideas he is thinking in. Descartes determines that in…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Having a belief that all questions have a scientific or mathematical answer; Rene Descartes in his search for solutions used principles that were already known and sets out to establish specific knowledge or truths. One of his most startling revelations is outlined in his writing “Discourse on the Method IV.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first doubt that Descartes highlights is that of his senses. He says that all of the information he has received has been through his senses and that sometimes his senses mislead him. Descartes is sure in his existence. To him, this is impossible to doubt and he justifies this…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes begins to form a better form of his beliefs. He is able to break apart and see what he thinks is true and false.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes, R, Murdoch, D. & Cottingham, J.The philosophical writings of Descartes, Volume 2. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Role of God in Descartes

    • 1464 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Descartes’ Meditations revolve around presenting the reader with arguments regarding existence. In his first meditation, he elucidates the idea that he was raised with numerous false beliefs, all of which he believes should be thrown out in order to reach a certain truth. A new foundation is brought about, as opposed to that of medieval times. The world that we apprehend through the sense, since senses lend themselves to doubt, is out of the window. The only things that seemingly do not lend themselves to uncertainty are the theoretical sciences, such as math. This is where the role of God comes into play, as he then steers towards the worst case scenario where God is a deceiver and all things, both practical and theoretical sciences, may be called to hesitation. Descartes wants to find something that cannot be called into doubt, and if he can, he has reached a new foundation.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes is interested in the certainty of his existence and the existence of other people and things. Descartes' beliefs vary from those of Socrates. Descartes argues that knowledge is acquired through awareness and experience. Using this approach, Descartes moves through doubt to certainty of his existence. He asks himself various questions about the certainty of his existence and solves them through clear thought and logic. Using this method Descartes establishes doubts to be truths and by the end of the book, he has established that he does indeed exist. In this paper, I will show how Descartes moves through doubt to certainty. I will explain how Descartes uses the cogito, proves the existence of God and what that means to his existence. I will also discuss the general rules of truth that Descartes establishes. In the First Meditation Descartes begins to examine what is certain and what is doubtful. Descartes wants to establish that his knowledge is certain and not doubtful. He states, ...I had accepted many false opinions as being true, and that what I had based on such insecure principles could only be most doubtful and uncertain; so that I had to undertake seriously once in my life to rid myself of all opinions I had adopted up to then, and to begin, and to begin afresh from the foundations, if I wished to establish something firm and constant in the sciences.(Descartes 95) By this Descartes means that he wishes to establish a foundation for his knowledge based on certainty instead of doubt. Descartes first looks at the senses. This is important because the senses are the first thing to cause doubt. He focuses on the perception of things. He says that things far from him, in the distance, give him reason to doubt their certainty, while things that are close to him are indubitable and he is clear about their certainty. However, Descartes realizes that dreams pose an obstacle to his beliefs. Even up close, dreams can be indubitable. Descartes believes that if…

    • 2310 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causal Realism & Idealism

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We next part of the chapter the book discusses is Cogito, “I think, therefor I am” means that the act of thinking presupposes the existence of the subject - the thinker. This is important because it requires no other predicates. The mere act of questioning means that there is a questioner. The reading material then moves to the criticisms of cogito. The most universally accepted opinion is that the conclusion is extremely limited. Descartes was incapable to express his doubts. Thus, the attempt to doubt anything would be necessarily self-defeating. The next theory for discussion is “Representative Realism”.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First of all, in the First Meditation, Descartes demonstrates that several arguments for doubting all of his previously basic beliefs. Everything that he thought is the doubt. He has started to doubt from everything and he wanted to find the question of truth with own ideas. Descartes defines knowledge in terms of doubt and he aims ‘to reach certain’. At the same time, we have to use five senses but Descartes believes the senses sometimes deceive us concerning things. Also Descartes is often convinced when he is dreaming that he is sensing real objects. For instance, he said that “There is the fact that I am here, seated by the fire, and attired in a dressing gown, having this paper in my hands and other similar matters. And how could I deny that these hands and this body are mine (…)” (146). Descartes believes that we can achieve certain truth when we will doubt everything. Descartes uses some question to help prove one of his main arguments and ideas to find truth. For example, how we know certain, what is true, what we see, what we hear? As we can see, according to Descartes, the senses are not enough to decide what is real. He believes the truth is in his mind and he must use his mind.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With development of education, people would doubt everything and they would forget about simplicity. Before the Scientific Revolution, people knew nothing about education, so they did not doubt things, they would think of everything simply without complication, but now with the development of sciences and arts people tend to doubt almost everything and have reasons based on their thoughts. But does not a good education make the world much more easier? Now, with the arts and sciences we can do almost everything easier than they used to be back at the time. Education actually guides people to good manners. It teaches us things we never knew about, before. It widens the way of our thinking and make us smarter. Without education we would not know how to behave nicely in public. Without education our minds would stick to one thing that we think we are good at. So, even if the thing is bad, you would still stick to it because you do not have other choices. Being a terrorist is an example of this.Terrorists are the less educated classes. You can hardly find one that is a terrorist with a good degree of education. So, they only do what they have and do not explore things. What makes you explore things is education. The way it teaches you new things make you be more curious than ever. So, with education you would do anything to be a better human…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Education by Krishnamurti

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages

    "I WONDER IF WE HAVE EVER ASKED ourselves what education means. Why do we go to school, why do we learn various subjects, why do we pass examinations and compete with each other for better grades? What does this so-called education mean, and what is it all about? This is really a very important question, not only for the students, but also for the parents, for the teachers , and for everyone who loves this earth. Why do we go through the struggle to be educated? Is it merely in order to pass some examinations and get a job? Or is it the function of education to prepare us while we are young to understand the whole process of life? Having a job and earning one's livelihood is necessary- but is that all? Are we being educated only for that? Surely , life is not merely a job, an occupation, life is something extraordinarily wise and profound, it is a great mystery, a vast realm in which we function as human beings. If we merely prepare ourselves to earn a livelihood, we shall miss the whole point of life; and to understand life is much more important than merely to prepare for examinations and become very proficient in mathematics, physics, or what you will.…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents an introduction consisting of background of study, problems of study, objective of the study, and significance of the study. 1.1 Background of the Study Language has a social function as a tool to make connection between human beings. Without language, it seems impossible for people to interact with others in their daily life because language can express people’s feeling, willing, opinion, etc. In case of communication, some public figures might influence language use in socio culture. The figure public not only as the entertainer for society but also as a trendsetter of any aspects such as the fashion style, hobby, and the language style. The later aspect is the interesting one that we want to analyze in our mini research. The influence of figure public language style toward society is could studied in Critical Discourse Analysis (commonly abbreviated to CDA). Fairclough, the founder of CDA, explains that CDA is a theory of language in relation to power and ideology (1995:1). This is a theory enabling us to discover how a ruling class rules the society through their linguistics practices. Simply put, CDA is an interdisciplinary study combining linguistic theory and social theories, such as politics, economics, religion, culture, communication, etc. in order to shed light on how the social and power domination are acted out in linguistic practice. We can found language style used by figure public in any kinds of media such as television, radio, internet, newspaper, and even in media socials. One of the phenomenal public figure is an Indonesian singer, Syahrini, who is known by her words. She produces some famous words such as sesuatu, Alhamdulillah ya, cetar membahana, and the last one is terpampang nyata. Those five words are famous among our society and everyone often use them in daily communication. How do Syahrini’s words influence language use in socio cultural? Of course, there is a reason why does Syahrini have…

    • 4798 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Notes of Methodology

    • 15812 Words
    • 64 Pages

    Words made of multiple syllables; each syllable has meaning e.g., Turkish. For example, ev (house), evler (houses), evlerde (in the houses), evlerden (from the houses)…

    • 15812 Words
    • 64 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bacon Essay: of Travel

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Travel, in the younger sort, is a part of education, in the elder, a part of experience. He that travelleth into a country, before he hath some entrance into the language, goeth to school, and not to travel. That young men travel under some tutor, or grave servant, I allow well; so that he be such a one that hath the language, and hath been in the country before; whereby he may be able to tell them what things are worthy to be seen, in the country where they go; what acquaintances they are to seek; what exercises, or discipline, the place yieldeth. For else, young men shall go hooded, and look abroad little. It is a strange thing, that in sea voyages, where there is nothing to be seen, but sky and sea, men should make diaries; but in land-travel, wherein so much is to be observed, for the most part they omit it; as if chance were fitter to be registered, than observation. Let diaries, therefore, be brought in use. The things to be seen and observed are: the courts of princes, especially when they give audience to ambassadors; the courts of justice, while they sit and hear causes; and so of consistories ecclesiastic; the churches and monasteries, with the monuments which are therein extant; the walls and fortifications of cities, and towns, and so the heavens and harbors; antiquities and ruins; libraries; colleges, disputations, and lectures, where any are; shipping and navies; houses and gardens of state and pleasure, near great cities; armories; arsenals; magazines; exchanges; burses; warehouses; exercises of horsemanship, fencing, training of soldiers, and the like; comedies, such whereunto the better sort of persons do resort; treasuries of jewels and robes; cabinets and rarities; and, to conclude, whatsoever is memorable, in the places where they go. After all which, the tutors, or servants, ought to make diligent inquiry. As for triumphs, masks, feasts, weddings, funerals, capital executions, and such shows, men need not to be put in mind of them; yet are they…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays