Sociology Among the Social Sciences
Source: Encyclopedia of Sociology, 2nd Edition, E. Borgatta and R. Montgomery (eds.), pp. 2913-2927 The relationship between sociology and the other social sciences is in reality relationship between sectors of different disciplines, not between whole disciplines. Sociology is one of the most open disciplines toward other disciplines. This openness is manifested in the citation patterns in academic publications, which allow one to measure the degree of coherence of a discipline, the relationship between specialties within a discipline, and the interactions among disciplines. If specialists in a subdiscipline tend to cite mostly or exclusively specialists in the same subdiscipline, and if relatively few authors cite outside their own subdiscipline, then as a whole the discipline has a low degree of internal coherence. It could be compared to watertight compartments or containers in large ships. In this case, the real loci of research are the specialties. If, by contrast, a significant proportion of authors, cross the borders of their specialties, the discipline as a whole can be considered an integrated territory. As can be seen in the analytical and alphabetical indices of most compendiums and textbooks, sociology has a weak core. The fragmentation of the discipline into isolated specialties can be seen in most sociological treatises: "We divide up the discipline into a number of topics, each the subject of a chapter. These chapters are minimally integrated" (Calhoun, 1992, p. 185). Theoretical sociology is presented as a subfield disconnected from substantive domains: "General sociology has been relegated primarily to introductory textbooks and to a lesser extent to a sort of social theory that most practicing sociologists use but little in their work" (idem). For instance, in the Handbook of Sociology edited by Neil Smelser, the 22 chapters represent autonomous specialties, that are only weakly related to each other. Few of the 3 200 authors cited in that work are mentioned in more than one specialty (Dogan, 1997). This lack of consensus among sociologists has been emphasized in a symposium devoted to this Handbook (Calhoun and Land, 1989). In the general works in sociology published in the last two decades, the most frequently cited authors are ancestors, not contemporary sociologists. With some exceptions such as Parsons, Merton, Lazarsfeld, Mills, few mentors belong to the immediately previous generation. Nowadays, sociologists in their pattern of references are like children elevated by their grandparents. This cult of the ancestors is surprising, because "following advances in the division of labour and specialization, the works of the classics ceased to be directly useful to an average sociologist. To do correct research in a specialized branch of sociology one does not in fact have to read the works — bulky, often abstruse, and semi-philosophical in nature — written by Marx and Spencer, Simmel and Weber, Mead and Znaniecki. To do such research if suffices to master, on the basis of a possibly
recent handbook, the standard techniques and the current theories of the middle range" (Szacki, 1982, p. 360). The fragmentation of sociology can be explained in part by the absence of any consensus on a dominant, integrative theory, or a widely-accepted paradigm. If a consensus could be reached among sociologists, it would be that sociology has today a small, soft and old core, that is not a centripetal discipline, and that it expands in all directions. Its territory looks very much like the decaying Roman empire when most soldiers were at distant frontiers, without an army in the capital. Openess to what? To other disciplines. There is very little communication between the fifty specialized domains recognized by the International Sociological Association, and between the thirty sectors of the American Sociological Association. If cooperation among the...
References: Aronson, Sidney, 1969, "Obstacles to a Rapprochement Between History and Sociology: A Sociologist 's View", In Sherif and Sherif, eds. Interdisciplinary Relationships in the Social Sciences, Chicago Adline, 292-304. Aymard, Maurice, 1988, "Histoire et Sociologie" in H. Mendras and M. Verret, Les Champs de la Sociologie Française, Paris, Colin. Bartoli, H., 1991, L 'Economie Unidimensionnelle, Paris, Economica. Boudon, Raymond, 1979, "Sociologie et Histoire : l 'analyse sociologique du singulier", La Logique du Social, Paris, Hachette, 37-66. Braudel, Fernand, 1962, "Histoire et Sociologie", Traité de Sociologie, ed. G. Gurvitch, Paris, PUF, 83-98. Brunet, Roger, 1982, "La géographie", Les Sciences de l 'Homme et de la Société en France, Paris, La Documentation Française, 381-420. Buchanan, James, 1966, "Economics and its Scientifc Neighbors", Sherman R. Krupp, ed. The Structure of Economic Science, Prentice-Hall. Burke, Peter, 1980, Sociology and History, Allen & Unwin. Cahman, Werner and Alvin Boskoff, eds, 1964, Sociology and History and Research, Free Press. Calhoun, C. and K.C. Land, 1989, "Symposium: Smelser 's Handbook: A. Assessment", Contemporary Sociology, 18, pp. 475-513. Calhoun, Craig, 1992, "Sociology, other Disciplines and the Project of a General Understanding of Social Life", T.C. Halliday and M. Janowitz, op. cit. pp. 137-195. Chaunu, Pierre, 1979, Interview, Le Courrier du CNRS, 33, 5. Collins, Randall "Is 1980s Sociology in the Doldrums?" American Journal of
Sociology, Vol. 91, 6, May 1986, pp. 1336-55. Crane, Diana and Henry Small, 1992, "American Sociology since the Seventies: the Emerging Identity Crisis in the Discipline", T.C. Halliday and M. Janowitz, op. cit. 197-234. Dogan, Mattei and Robert Pahre, 1990, Creative Marginality, Innovation at the Intersections of Social Sciences, Boulder, Colo. Westview Press. Dogan, Mattei, 1994, "Fragmentation of the Social Sciences and Recombination of Specialties". International Social Science Journal, 139, 27-42. Dogan, Mattei, 1996, "Political Science and the Other Social Sciences", in Boodin and Klingemann, A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford University Press, 97-130. Dogan, Mattei, 1997, "The New Social Sciences: Crack in the Disciplinary Walls", International Social Science Journal, 153, September, 429-443. Dogan, Mattei, 1999, "Marginality" M. Runco and S. Pritzker, eds., Encyclopedia of Creativity, New York Academic Press. Galbraith, J.K., "Conditions for Economic Change in Underdeveloped Countries", Journal of Farm Economics, 33, 255-69. Gay, David, E.R. and Alan R. Waters, 1983, "The Interrelationships of Economics with the Social Sciences", The Social Science Journal, 20, 3, 1-8. Goodin, Robert E. and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 1996. A New Handbook of Political Science Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.. Halliday, Terence and Morris Janowitz, eds, 1992, Sociology and its Publics, University of Chicago Press. Hayek, F.A., 1956, "The Dilemna of Specializtion", In Leonard White, ed. The State of the Social Sciences, Chicago University Press. Hirshleifer, Jack, 1985, "The Expanding Domain of Economics", American Economic Review, 72, 6, 53-68. Huntington, Ellsworth, 1924, Civilization and Climate, New Haven, Conn. Yall University Press. Inkeles, Alex, 1970, "Sociological Theory in Relation to Social Psychological Variables", J.C. McKinney and Ed. A. Tiryakian, eds., Theoretical Sociology, New York, Appleton, 404-431. Inkeles, Alex, 1983, "The sociological Contribution to Advances in the Social Sciences", The Social Science Journal, 20, 3, 27-44. Intriligator, Michael, 1985, "Independence Among the Behavioral Sciences", Structural Changes and Economic Dynamics, 1, 1. Johnston, Barry U., 1997, "Dominant Intellectual Tradition and the Coherence or Disintegration of the Discipline?", paper presented at the International Institute of Sociology, Cologne, July. Kamarck, Andrew M., 1976, The Tropics and Economic Development, John Hopkins University Press for the World Bank. Klein, Julie Thompson, 1996, Crossing Boundaries, University Press of Virginia. Knapp, Peter, 1984, "Can Social Theory Escape from History: View of History in Social Science" History and Theory, 23, 1, 34-52. Kohn, Melvin, L. 1989, Cross-National Research in Sociology. Sage Publications, London. Levy, Marion, J., 1970, "Scientific Analysis is a Subset of Comparative Analysis",
McKinney and Tiryakian, op. cit. 99-110. Lewis, W.A., 1955, The Theory of Economic Growth, Allena Unwin. Lipset, SM. and R. Hofstadter, 1968, Sociology and History: Methods N.Y. Basic Books. Martinelli, A. and N. Smelser, 1990, "Economic Sociology, Historical Trends and Analytic Issues", Current Sociology, 38, 2, 1-49. McKinney, John, C. and Edward A. Tyriakian eds., 1970, Theoretical Sociology, N.Y-Appleton. Messer-Davidow, E., D.R. Schumway, D.J. Sylvan, eds. 1993, Knowledge: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity, University Press of Virginia. Offe, Claus, 1992, "Political Economy: Sociological Perspectives" in Goodin and Klingemann, eds. op. cit. 675-690. Radnitzky, G. and Bernholz, P. 1986, Economic Imperialism: The Economic Approach Outside the Traditional Areas of Economics, N.Y. Paragon House. Riggs, Fred W., 1984, "Development" in Social Science Concepts: A systematic Analysis, G. Sartori ed., London, Sage, 125-204. Rigney, D. and D. Barnes, 1980, "Patterns of Interdisciplinary Citation in the Social Sciences" Social Science Quarterly, 114-127. Rokkan, Stein, 1995, Special issue dedicated to Rokkan 's geo-economic model, Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée, 2, 1, 5-170. Rose, Richard, 1991, "Institutionalizing Professional Political Science in Europe", Political Studies, 39, 3, 446-462. Scheuch, Erwin, K., 1992, "German Sociology" In Encyclopedia of Sociology, E.F. Borgatta and M.L. Borgatta, eds. N.Y. Macmillan, 762-772. Simiand, François, 1903, "Méthode historique et science sociale", Revue de Synthèse Historique. Smelser, Neil, and Richard Swedberg, eds., 1994, Handbook of Economic Sociology, Princeton University Press. Smelser, Neil, ed. 1988, Handbook of Sociology, London, Sage. Smelser, Neil, "Sociology and the Other Social Sciences", 1967, in The Uses of Sociology, ed. P. Lazarsfeld, H. Sewell, H.L. Wilensky, eds. Basic Books, 344, New York. Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia. Solow, Robert, 1970, "Science and Ideology in Economics", The Public Interest, 21, Fall, 94-107. Szacki, Jerzy, 1982, "The History of Sociology and Substantive Sociological Theories" in T. Bottomore, S. Nowak, M. Sokolowska, Sociology, the State of the Art, London Sage, 359-374. Szenberg, Michael, 1992, Eminent Economists, Their Life Philosophies, Cambridge University Press. Tilly, Charles, 1981, As Sociology Meets History, N.Y. Academic Press. Tilly, Charles, 1984, Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons, N.Y., Russel Sage Foundation. Turner, R.H., 1991, The many faces of American sociology: A discipline in serarch of identify. in D. Easton and C. Schelling (eds.), Divided knowledges: Across Disciplines, across Cultures (pp. 59-85). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document