Preview

Conflict Between Socrates And Socrate

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1815 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conflict Between Socrates And Socrate
• Last Class: November 21st • Apology is a public speech; Crtio is a private speech • Socrates ○ was the first philosopher concerned with human affairs (ethics, morality) ○ Socrates originally devoted his time to science ○ Later abandoned science and shifted attention to ethics-philosophy ○ Never wrote anything; so how do we know anything about him? Because of: § Plato § Xenophon § Aristophanes (Clouds)- accuser ○ Plato is the mouth piece of Socrates in most cases § But not verbatim; a lie in such that it cannot be verbatim § Idea that Plato is ventriloquist; allows us to just focus on the speech • Apologia: Defence speech • Socrates brought to trial ○ No judge, just officials ○ Jurors; …show more content…
○ Socrates begins his defence with the old accusers § Cant cross examine them because the old accusers are dead § Did not charge Socrates with not believing in the gods; that was an inference made later buy the new accusers § Arguments (19a8 -20c3) § Addresses the jurors from childhood saying they have been prejudiced against him since childhood § Trials only lasted one day but how do you change someone's deep seeded prejudices in a matter of one day? You can't § Shows his support for Athenian law (19a7) § Defends himself because he says it is his legal duty; shows no strong hope that he will be acquitted § Socrates tried to disprove the Oracle who said Socrates was the wisest Athenian, Socrates did not think this was true but on the other hand he believed his Oracle was right (charge #2) § Socrates spent his whole life based on what the Oracle stated □ How can you say/charge him with Impiety when his whole life has been based on the …show more content…
□ Says being disgraced is something worse than death; any decent Athenian would have made the same argument during this time in Athens ® This clarifies his position at 28d ® Makes the argument that all men of Athens should stand by their beliefs without fear of death; ® admits he is prepared to do his duty to Athens, he will obey the law but he will also adhere to the rules of higher authority(the gods) ◊ Critical point in the Crito ® If he were an atheist he would have disobeyed the Oracle • The outcome ○ 29c Acquitted on the terms that he must not investigate this anymore and must not practice philosophy anymore ○ Socrates states he will continue to obey the Oracle over the people judging him ○ Socrates truly believes he is a gad fly of sorts; set to action but the god to awaken Athenians § To make Athenians want to leave better lives § Better lives: Goal of virtue and not wealth • Socrates says he has been absent from political life his entire life; explains why he wasn’t political ○ Says he's had a daimonia voice in his head that tells him when he has or is about to do something wrong; a voice that has veto power; the voice counselled him to avoid political life and stay away from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of the greatest known phenomenons ever produced by greek literature, was the incorporation of the two particles men and de. These were created with the intention to indirectly designate opposites in writing, allowing the two contrasting ideas to achieve an equilibrium, uncovering the truth somewhere in the middle. At the end of the first year of the Peloponnesian War, Pericles delivers an oration speech in which he explains what he believes the nature of Athens to be. In the following years, Thucydides gives a report of the Plague of 430, regarding the state of Athens. With a significant comprehension of both accounts, we can generate a accurate depiction of the condition of Athens. In order to produce this understanding, I will first delve into the rhetoric of Pericles speech, then turn my attention to Thucydides account of of the plague that ravished Attica.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also accustomed to forcing his wishes and views upon others (1). Therefore, during the developing of the voting, Juror Three try to force people to admit his prejudice continuously. If people do not agree his view and vote for not guilty, he is angry and interrupt other Jurors’ discussion. Even though other jurors support appropriate assumption and evidence to prove the murder is not guilty, Juror Three do not believe and keep his prejudice which has logical fallacies. For example, when Juror Nine change his vote in the second voting for not guilty, and want to explain the reason why he change his mind, Juror Three answers, “No, we wouldn’t like to know why”(12). When Juror Eight try to measure how long the old man can walk in 15 minutes, and walk as slowly as the old man who uses canes. However, Juror Three says, “You made it sound like a long walk. It’s not,” (19) and when Juror Eleven thinks Juror Eight’s behavior can be an important point. Juror Three declares, “It’s a ridiculous waste of time”…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates looks to the priest to tell him what exactly is pious so that he may educate himself as to why he would be perceived as impious. Found in the Apology, another of Plato's Five Dialogues, Socrates aims to defend his principles to the five hundred and one person jury. Finally, the Crito, an account of Socrates' final discussion with his good friend Crito, Socrates is offered an opportunity to escape the prison and his death sentence. As is known, Socrates rejected the suggestion. It is in the Euthyphro and the Apology that it can be deduced that Socrates is not guilty as charged, he had done nothing wrong and he properly defended himself. However, in the Crito, it is shown that Socrates is guilty only in the interpretation and enforcement of Athens' laws through the court system and its jurors. Socrates' accusations of being blasphemous are also seen as…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates official formal accusation was in 399 BCE, he was brought in to the jury by Meletus a man that was embarrassed while being interrogated by Socrates. Meletus reasoning for Socrates formal accusation was the he was charged for not recognizing the gods recognized by the state, introducing others, new divinities and corrupting the youth (The Apology).…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “It asserts that Socrates does injustice by corrupting the young and by not believing in the gods in whom the city believes, but in other daimonia ”…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athens Citizenship Dbq

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When Athenians ostracised a fellow citizen it means they didn’t either participate or threatened the stability democracy. It purpose was to protect the city from harm.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the ancient world, there is barely any autonomy in a modern sense but it is beginning to be considered. Oedipus possesses his own use of knowledge rather then religious superstition to solve the problem of the Sphinx that had been plaguing Thebes, although Oedipus has followed the traditional responsibilities in serving the city. Oedipus’s and Socrates beliefs have ended them in death. Socrates, like Oedipus, also take a somewhat sceptical attitude toward the divine or at least toward the traditional gods of Athens. It is important to remember that Socrates accepts the truth of the oracle not simply on its authority as divine, as the word of the god, but only because it passes the test of human…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But on the other hand this choice has to be made "on attaining manhood". If the individual decides to stay and live there then he is automatically participating in the law making process and he engages in the "political association" (The Politics). In conclusion he must completely obey any decision the state makes concerning him even if this decision involves his death. He continues and states that if he would escape, the city and its laws could be destroyed. The judicial system would have no more power because the people will stop trusting the system. Chaos would be the imminent outcome. Therefore we get to another minor premise that states that destroying Athens laws will hurt its citizens. Committing an act that could harm other people is against Socrates premise of living well. By harming other people you destroy your own character and conscience. According to Socrates life is not worth living with a ruined conscience the same as it is not worth living "with a body which is worn out and ruined in health"…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Apology is one of the numerous recorded writings about Socrates. It talks about the trail of Socrates who is arrested on the charges corrupting the youth, not believing in the gods of the lord, and for being a Sophist. Socrates is not believed to have written any books; the apology was written by his student Plato who was at his trial. In this paper, I will discuss I will be talking about the charges laid against Socrates and how he defends himself.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, Socrates did not believe in the same gods as Athens, the easiest of his convictions to prove because of his Apology. In his plea, Socrates distracts the jury with stories of disbelievers. As the defense begins, he does not say that he does believe or disbelieve in the gods of Athens, since the easiest answer for an innocent man is “I did not do it.” Instead, he takes a route of disapproval and disbelief that this charge was brought up against him, “Socrates does injustice by not believing in gods, but believing in gods (p.77 27a),” he says in a mocking manner that is meant to make the jury question themselves. He further twists and turns the accusation by saying similar things; is there such thing as one who “believes… in human matters but not humans,” “not believing… in horse matters but believing in horses,” and “not believing in flute players, but believes in flute matter (p.77, 27a-b)?” To finish his point, he makes a final example of the atrocity of the charge against him, “Is there anyone who believes that there are daimonic matters, but does not believe in daimons (p.77, 27c)?” This argument…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socrate's Conviction

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages

    [ 5 ]. Linder, Douglas. "The Trial of Socrates." Social Science Research Network. University of Missouri, 2002. Web. 25 Apr. 2013.…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Gorgias1, Socrates says, “I think that I am the only or almost the only Athenian living who practices the true art of politics; I am the only politician of my time”, while in the Apology2, he claims that “he who will really fight for the right, if he would live even for a little while, must have a private station and not a public one.” As we know, Socrates did manage to live for over 70 years, and did indeed confine himself to a private stance; but how can one be a politician without being a public figure? Or was Socrates not a true champion of justice, as he maintained to be?…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major themes that Socrates heavily focused on in his speech was the philosophical ideas of wisdom and a description of Socrates’ own wisdom as well. Older accusers had allegedly claimed that Socrates did not believe in gods, and instead would try to explain phenomenons through physical explanations instead, as well as the fact that Socrates would teach others how to make a weak argument triumph a stronger one by using clever rhetorics. In Socrates’ defense, he has stated that he does not have any kind of competence and expertise in any of these areas. This statement truly divides Socrates from sophists and even Presocratics, as teachers that each belong to these organizations assert that only through experience and examination they can gain…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Unjust Analysis

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates, one of the greatest minds go Ancient Greece’s was no exception. As a sophist, Socrates was considered a teacher of the noble. Sophist of Greed taught young men ’arete’: excellence or virtue for a price. However, Socrates wasn’t a regular sophist, he never accepted any monetary reward for his ’teachings“ (b316,p813) and he never actually taught anything but rather trained minds to think. Socrates states at the trail that he doesn’t have any true knowledge and he believed that in order to have any true knowledge one must be able to produce a single, clear definition of a subject without any exclusions to the rule, something that he was never able believed that he couldn’t do.Rather than use he own opinions to teach his pupils what to think, Socrates used ”systematic questioning“ (b136p813) to help clear their own minds and reach their own conclusions just by thinking. A skill that they could carry forward, into their lives as Athenian citizens. With this in mind, it is nearly impossible for the Athenians government to find Socrates guilty of…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial of Socrates

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Part of understanding this case is understand the time in which the case was held. This time being 399 B.C., a time in which Athens was a free democratic city, a town that prided itself at the time on the fact that its citizens had much freedom, particularly freedom of speech. Socrates believed that only people who were educated should rule the people, which meant that people were not capable of government participation unless they had the proper knowledge to do so effectively.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays