Preview

Comparing The Myth Of The Ant Queen And Project Classroom Makeover

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1351 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing The Myth Of The Ant Queen And Project Classroom Makeover
After reading the chapters “The Myth of the Ant Queen” and “Project Classroom Makeover” by Steven Johnson and Cathy Davidson, respectively, readers may have spotted that collective knowledge, as well as different systems of organization, also respectively, were mentioned in the story. Interestingly enough, these two completely different stories still had ideas that can work together to address a point: Although these are two completely different stories made by different authors, one can still see how knowledge, more specifically collective knowledge, can greatly affect how effective multiple systems of organization can be. After all, collaboration with different people and/or other living things as is the case with Johnson’s story generally …show more content…
A simple system would be something one can predict since it only contains about two or three variables. On the other hand, disorganized complexity would be something that you could not predict whatsoever, such as how Manchester is organized. Nobody would have guessed that there would be an area where all the wealthy people would be living and commuting in and out during their day to day lives. Nobody could have guessed a lot of things, such as where the gay communities would have started up, or where would all the illegal activities generally occur, which in this case was the docks. However, this is not to say that collective knowledge had no say in Johnson’s story, for it has made a greater impact on multiple systems mentioned than some readers may have originally thought. Take the ants for example, and how their queen ant is more of an equal to the rest of the ant colony then what was more populary thought before. The worker ants are special in the sense that “their genes instruct them to protect their mother the same way their genes instruct them to forage for food. In other words, the matriarch doesn’t train her servants to protect her, evolution does” (Johnson 194). Basically, collective knowledge is at work here, for the ants may have evolved to protect their …show more content…
Through these two stories, it became clear how knowledge such as collective knowledge can heavily impact the way a system of organization is meant to be. Whether it be in Cathy Davidson’s small classroom example containing a teacher and student desperately in need of a new solution to guarantee passing the eigth grade, or in Steven Johnson’s ant example where evolution assisted the collective thinking of all the ants, collective knowledge is a great thing to utilize. As hinted by Cathy Davidson before, being an expert at something means one would have had to put in a humongous amount of time to work in their area of expertise. It just wouldn’t be feasible for Miss Schmidt to have assumed position of maximum authority 100% of the time since it would have meant failing one of her students, which implies that she was not able to get her entire class to pass and can harm her reputation as a good teacher that meets everyone’s needs. Also, it definitely would not have worked out in the ant colony for ants work to feed the colony and such like a working husband/wife would for their family. With all those ants going in and out of small tight spaces and managing the flow of resources as well as keeping the queen ant out of harm’s way, it would only be ideal for every single ant to communicate

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Large Ant Essay

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What is “human nature”? Do a natural set of behavioral paradigms govern our morals at the most basic level? And more importantly, are those prescribed behaviors inherently good, or naturally evil? The Large Ant by Howard Fast depicts human nature as leaning toward the latter. Many other artistic and literary works seem to take this position, arguing that because humans have the capacity to commit evil deeds, they must themselves be evil. In Fast’s view, humans are naturally selfish and xenophobic, reacting to the unknown with violence instead of simple curiosity. This story, however, presents an overly cynical and unrealistic glimpse of human nature at its worst. Its arguments are often self-contradictory, and in the end, The Large Ant’s critique of human nature proves unjustifiably negative.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nt1330 Unit 2 Study Guide

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However, when the elements in a system involve many dynamic relationships, complexity is inevitable. Complex systems are nondeterministic,…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    CH 43 Review Assessment

    • 1599 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Which form of communication is used by social insects to modify the behavior of the colony?…

    • 1599 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In “Mega Marketing of Depression,” Ethan Watters talks about how culture of depression was evolved in Japan. Steven Johnson in “The Myth of the Ant Queen” talks about the pattern which were used to develop organized complexity. In “The Power of the Context,” Malcolm Gladwell talks about the circumstances which were responsible in changing individual’s behavior. Although, all of these essays are related to each other, culture or community doesn’t determine individual behavior rather individuals determine the culture.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A system can be defined as “an organized whole made up of components that interact in a way distinct from their interaction with other entities and which endures over some period of time” (Anderson & Carter, 1990). A specific system that I identified in…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, we as a society cannot achieve better if we work alone compare to working together. Such as, neanderthal and how they weren’t able to survive compared to us (homosapien). Neanderthal is a specie that works alone and are powerful. However, they dislike working together as a whole. They have so much potential to be the strongest specie on this world, but the one reason that brought them to extinction is their choice of working alone instead of together. We (homosapien) ended up being superior since we are able to group up and work together to survive. Division is the number one problem and if we are able to fix it, we can be greater and better as a whole. To bring this discussion back, I believe that cooperation is one of the most important trait to develop. It’s better to have help than to just try to accomplish a problem by oneself. Cooperation is one of the few traits that we don’t value as much as other traits until we see how much effect it has on us. However, as society advances, it still leaves us with a question regarding collaboration and division, will society choose to be divided or will they realize the value in working together as a…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The individual is a crucial component of an organization, and their knowledge is what is key to ensuring they, as members of an organization, are better equipped to see, from their given areas of knowledge, room for improvement within an organization. Thus, in the age of the Knowledge Worker, I would say a leader (in-line with the transformational and situational approaches of leading) would have to be able to evaluate the knowledge of their subordinates, and cultivate a greater knowledge of their own organization, as well. In other words, leaders in the Age of the Knowledge worker would have to be able to make use of the situation their subordinates present them with, i.e. with their varying arrays of skills and knowledges that could be useful to an organization. Furthermore, that leader would have to enable the knowledge workers in their organization to become more autonomous leaders in…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Davidson suggests that the common goal her student’s have is to fight against hierarchy and standard education. Davidson clearly believes that standardized education does not enrich students in a “world of social networking, crowdsourcing, customizing, and user-generated content” (Davidson 55). Her students are fighting towards a different learning mechanism that is not forced upon their throats by teachers. That is why students get to learn collectively if they “[convince] a prof to require [an iPod] for a course and come up with a learning app in the course” (Davidson 51). Individuals had to be unified so people other than the freshmen can receive an iPod therefore breaking away from the standardized school system. Students are working collectively so that they can fight against the “formal education [that] typically teaches hierarchies of what’s worth paying attention to” (Davidson 51). Davidson’s students are using the iPod as a mechanism to create learning applications that allow for individuals to overcome hierarchies. Johnson’s example of the ants resembles individuals fighting for a common goal without a hierarchy. Although, the students at Duke and the ants are opposites because one has a hierarchy and the other does not; the ants are working together for a common goal. The ants are proven to show that they have created a unique system in the absence of hierarchy because they have a common set of goals. As Gordon clear points out “the queen is not an authority figure. It would be physically impossible for the queen to direct every worker's decision about which task to perform and when” (Johnson 194). These ants do not have an authority figure but they still have a common goal of keeping their queen safe. These ants work collectively to ensure that their queen is safe thereby ensuring the life of their species. Johnson also shows the impact of hierarchy in…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The point of any collaboration is to bring together different ideas for one solution. By exchanging opinions, everyone can decide what works best for the group. When too many like minded people come together, they dole out the same product. If a group contains all organizers or thinkers, they might have a 10 page paper of all conflicting ideas because they couldn’t agree on one topic. History’s bloodiest events usually started with one group of likeminded people pushing their ideas onto the rest of the world.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Small Groups

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the essays, “Committees, Juries, and Teams: The Columbia Disaster and How Small Groups Can Be Made to Work,” and “The Hive” shows the ways to properly run a small group and how to get the correct and best results. The two essays also say what to avoid when working in a small group; for example how to avoid group polarization and why that is detrimental to small groups. The essay by James Surowiecki also explains to avoid a type of dictator in the small group, someone who is the main mouthpiece to the group and why that is a negative aspect to have in a small group. The two essays show the pros and cons of working in small groups, both authors show that if the people with in the group do not work properly together the outcome the group is working towards can be deficient. Both authors also show that if the small group works well together and abides by certain rules, the group can have a positive and efficient effect on the problem the group is working towards, like having cognitive diversity in a group. Or another positive thing to have in a small group is equality. The authors touch on the dos and don’ts of a small group environment, when following closely to these suggestions small groups can do the job they were meant to do correctly.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Susan Cain wrote a book in 2012 : « Quiet, the power of introverts in a world that can’t stop talking »…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    o Systems are not collection of random parts, but organized wholes, system operates as a totality of interacting elements. As parts of the system interact over time, new elements of the system emerge. E.g. teams develop norms that regulate communication.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Webster define complexity as 1a) the quality or state being composed of two or more separate or analyzable items, parts, constituents, or symbol. 2a) having many varied parts, or elements, and consequently hard to understand.2b) marked by involvement of many parts, aspects, and need earnest study or examination to understand it. Based on product design, it defines as proportional to the total number of design decision (Baldwin& Clark 2009). The number of functions designed into products (Griffin 1997a, 1997b), the numbers of components (Gupta&Krishnan 1999). Other than that, it defines as number of physical modules and by the degree of dependency (Kaski&Heikkila 2002). It also has three different definitions for the complex system like it is a system that mixes with the different parts in a complicated way and hard for the industry to understand. (Flood &Carson 1988). According to Klir(1985), a system manifesting differentiation and connectively.…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Holism

    • 3897 Words
    • 19 Pages

    are frequently so complex that their behavior is, or appears, “new” or "emergent": it cannot be deduced from…

    • 3897 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Loafing

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The common problem when working in a group is social loafing. “Social loafing is the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually.”(pg.299) The best way to discourage social loafers is limit the group size, holding each individual responsible for their part, and setting group goals. One of the common stereotypes about groups is that team work intimates individual effort and increases the groups’ capacity to achieve its goals. However, in late 1920s, German psychologist names Max Ringelmann did a rope-pulling experiment on groups. He assumed that the group of three would pull three times as much as one person, and group of eight would pull eight times as much as one person. He came to a conclusion that more people in the group may be better for the total productivity, but the individual’s productivity of each group member declines.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays