Preview

Comparing Kantianism And Utilitarianism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
174 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Kantianism And Utilitarianism
Kantianism and Utilitarianism have different ways to decide if an act is right or wrong. Kantianism believes humans are rational beings and therefore are capable of choosing rational behaviors without the need to sacrifice others. Utilitarianism on the other hand believes that individuals should do whatever needed to produce the utmost happiness they can achieve. While both have the same end goal, Kantianism seems to be more ethical for it does not support using others to achieve happiness. Utilitarianism allows this with the theory that it is for one’s own greater good than it is morally correct to do. This applies to circumstances such as breaking the law and using others for person gain. If it induces happiness, then it would be considered
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Feinberg's Theory of Punishment
    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Feinberg's Theory of Punishment

    The Utilitarian Theory of punishment seeks to punish those that break the law in order to discourage or deter future wrongdoing. According to the Utilitarian Theory, law should be used in order to maximize the happiness of society. Both crime and punishment are inconsistent with happiness, and therefore utilitarianism believes that both of these factors should be kept to the minimum. The utilitarianism theory is ‘consequentialist,’ which means that utilitarianism recognizes that punishment has consequences for both the individual, and society as a whole. The total good that derives from the punishment must exceed the bad that may come from it.…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparison Of Utilitarian Ethical Theories
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparison Of Utilitarian Ethical Theories

    Utilitarian ethical theories are based on one’s ability to expect the concerns of an deed. Utilitarianism’s creed is that the result of any action takes importance over any type of means, this means that Utilitarianisms objective is to help as many individuals as possible even if it were to negatively disturb people along the way so as long as it helped the general populace. Basically, it’s the ends that matter not necessarily the means.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Health Canada's Argument Analysis
    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Health Canada's Argument Analysis

    I will first explicate on the theory of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a philosophical theory which states that that which is right is what brings the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest maximum number of people. The act that manages to fulfill this criteria is the act that is then morally right. As a result, whenever we consider what is a morally right action to do, we have to keep in mind that the action that would make it so that the accumulated level of happiness in the majority would be higher than the accumulated number of unhappiness in a majority. As well, utilitarianism is bias-free, in that the happiness levels of your close friends and family do not take priority over the happiness levels of the neighbors next door, or of people in countries that you have never visited and will never…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eth/316 Ethics And Social Responsibility Research Paper
    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Eth/316 Ethics And Social Responsibility Research Paper

    Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Kantianism And Utilitarianism
    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page

    Difference Between Kantianism And Utilitarianism

    From the vantage point of the history of ethical theory, there can be little doubt…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Groundwork For The Metaphysics Of Morality Analysis
    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Groundwork For The Metaphysics Of Morality Analysis

    Immanuel Kant, disagreed with the Utilitarian principle that maximized happiness for the greatest number of people. In chapter 2 of his book, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant theorizes an external critique that we don’t always act for desires but duty instead. Kant really has this worry and he wants to find a firm foundation for our moral laws. According to Kant, Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. Universal moral law is not empirical, not based on experience because then it is not justified and can take on different meanings. Once you strip away everything empirical, contingent, subjective about you will be left with a rational (form of the action itself). When…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism
    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism

    This essay aims to argue the views of two different theorist, Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant, with regards to their views on moral worth of an action. The idea of good and bad creates heated debates among many, but this essay will successfully unravel the layers of Bentham’s theory of Utilitarianism and his belief that all our motives are driven by pleasure and pain. While arguing Kant’s opposing argument that moral worth of an act revolves around democratic attitudes, and that moral truths are founded on reasons that is logical to all people. When one breaks down both theories, it occurs that Kant’s theory comes out to be the more sensible one in numerous aspects.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast Utilitarianism with Christian Ethics
    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Utilitarianism with Christian Ethics

    The ethical teachings and values of utilitarianism and Christian ethics are similar in some aspects, yet however are diverse in others. Utilitarianism is a generally teleological ethical system, where the outcome is said to justify the act. The act is considered ‘good’ if it brings about the greatest good for the greatest number. Christian Ethics, however, can be quite different. Many aspects of its ethics are deontological, for example, the Decalogue and Natural Law. There are other differences and indeed some similarities which will be considered throughout this essay.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism
    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    According to Kant, he believes that the only thing unconditionally good is good will. Good will is the idea of people having to do ones moral duty. Kant’s ethical theories are based off of the categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives, as stated during class, act only on those rules that you can rationally will to be universal. In response to Kant’s theory, I believe that good will is not the only thing that is unconditionally good. I believe this because there will be many instances in life where having a good will can lead to tragic situations.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparison between Utilitarianism and Idealism
    • 1153 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparison between Utilitarianism and Idealism

    The two theories that will be compared and contrasted in this essay are Plato's Idealism and Mill & Bentham's Utilitarianism. I chose these two theories because, to me, they are the ones that seem to be the most realistic and interesting. The way to get from the level of the "is" to the level of the "ought" of the Philosophers in these theories are the two bests. In this essay, it will be shown that the two theories are not so different in their relation between the level of the "is" and the level of the "ought"; it will be shown that Idealism would be a better theory for a society with highly intellectual people, and that a combination of these theory would be the best way for our society to evolve from the level of the "is" to the level of the "ought".…

    • 1153 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Kant And Utilitarianism
    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Difference Between Kant And Utilitarianism

    In this essay we will discuss what Kant’s and a utilitarian’s view on insider trading would be. As we have discussed in previous essays, Kant believed that moral rules could be known through reason and not just by observation (Shaw and Barry 69). For me this is the basis of all decisions that we make and why I would support Kant’s point of view on insider trading. Utilitarianism concentrates on producing the greatest amount of happiness and using it as a standard to determine if an action is right or wrong (Shaw and Barry 62). Utilitarianism requires too much concentration on individual aspects of what the greatest happiness is and basing moral standards around them.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ultilitarianism
    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ultilitarianism

    But this brings up an issue: most of morality is considered partial. It makes sense to care more about your children, family, and friends than complete strangers, but utilitarianism rejects this. If giving money, time, etc. to total strangers while “sacrificing the important needs of friends and family” results in the least amount harm than you are morally obligated to do so. We need to count everyone’s well being and interests equally. But this could lead to disastrous results. What if a majority of society benefits from an atrocity such as slavery? Utilitarianism would require us to allow it even if everyone’s interests were equally, since there would be a large amount of ‘benefit.’…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Utilitarian Ethics
    • 616 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain Utilitarian Ethics

    There are 2 main types of utilitarianism, the first I will talk about is Rule. Rule utilitarianism has certain principles involved with it, and from these, certain actions that we commit are able to be deemed as unacceptable. The principle of utility is therefore applied to a rule so the rule will stay if it leads to greater happiness for more people. This therefore means that if you do something bad that may lead to many people being happy, it could go against a rule or principle that has been set down in Rule…

    • 616 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Utilitarianism
    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant Vs Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism and Kant’s respective have different ways for demonstrating whether an act we do is right or wrong. Corresponding to Kant, we should look at our maxims, intentions, of a particular action. Kantians believe “If we are rational, we will each agree to curb our self-interest and cooperate with one another” (Shafer-Landau, Russ 194). In other words, humans are rational beings capable of rational behavior and should not be used purely for self-interest. On the other hand, Utilitarian’s believe that we should do actions that produce the greatest amount of happiness. However, this could associate using people as mere means and lead to the sacrifice of lives for the greater good.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Occupy Wall Street
    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Occupy Wall Street

    Utilitarian is the moral doctrine that we should always act to produce the greatest possible balance of good over bad for everyone affected by our actions. The greatest happiness of all constitutes the standard that determines whether an action is right or wrong. Our belief that we are individuals and society is the net result of our choices. For example, the practice of blowing up rocks to release underground natural gas would not be permitted near residential areas if energy complaints…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More