Preview

Comparing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. And Henry David Thoreau

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
324 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. And Henry David Thoreau
Two different writers, Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau, argue that society is not at its finest and that every man has the responsibility to impact change and every many has the power to do so, only if man is an extremist for the greater good. King was a reverend but more importantly he was a dominant voice for thousands of persecuted people during the civil rights movement. From King expressing his knowledge and acting on them, he was obliged and jailed (he was obliged to jail?) within King's cell he composed a letter entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. (transition?) Thoreau was a philosopher who contained all the qualities of a transcendentalist. Much time before King’s letter, Thoreau fabricated a response to when

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Upon comparing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Dalai Lama it becomes apparent that the two share many similar doctrines and beliefs. Although they come from two totally different backgrounds it seems as though their overall goals and dreams coincide. The most striking similarity is that both men advocated/advocate for peace and nonviolent solutions to problems. While they may have approached matters differently the goal was the same. Analyzing both men one begins to see that they are admired by so many people because of their philosophies.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both passages “Letter from Birmingham Jail” and “Resistance to Civil government” have the same general purpose which was the idea of Civil disobedience, not agreeing with the law because it violates one’s morality or inner conscience belief. In the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” Martin Luther King explains his reasoning for why he retaliated the law and the idea of protesting without violence. Henry David Theoreau recognizes the unjust ways of the government and the issues of slavery. The tone that Theoreau uses seems to be more aggravated and anger driven than that of King, who expresses the issues using a less harsh tone and not as many witty comments. In King’s passage, his tone is more deep and personal, speaking on a level representing the African American community and the hardships that they go through. In Theoreau’s passage, he uses a less personal approach and uses more factual based things and the use of grim irony explaining that what is being done is the opposite of what America was founded on, he goes on to say “Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward” This is similar to King’s quote “The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that "an unjust law is no law at all.”. King also explains his reasoning for his actions, for the revolutions and rebellion for the sake of the rights that all men are created equal and should be treated that way in America, because that is what is stated in the constitution and what the Christian faith…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The tone in Martin Luther King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” was much different compared to Henry David Thoreau’s “Resistance to Civil Government”. The two men were similar because they were both extremely passionate about their cause, but King seemed to become increasingly more irritated and frustrated as his letter progressed. In the beginning of King’s letter, he was very calm however towards the end he began to go about it differently. King emphasized a lot more than Thoreau did, simply because King’s letter was much more in depth and was longer in length. King used many detailed descriptions and examples from history to support almost everything point he made in his letter. For example, King stated that Apostle Paul left his village to carry the gospel of Jesus Christ to the Greco-Roman world. King compared himself to Paul because King has left him hometown to carry the gospel of freedom.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King had one statement that people connected with the African American people, the punch line stated, “I have a dream.” Not relating the two people because they are very different and all Americans unlike Trump hold King to the highest integrity. That being said, they are and were both prominent figures in society. Both prominent speakers had a message that they used to define their makeup. Trump has used his own rhetoric to the same effect and connects himself with the voters. Trump has used distinct message, which is “Make America Great Again.” During his campaign so far Trump has used, the language of the people. Malansky states, “Trump has a clear narrative, a master story that he sticks to”. He also goes on to say “He speaks…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Thoreau and King rely heavily on ethos to get their points across. The intended audience of both is similar; a group of people with similar morals as the writers, but who have neglected action for various reasons. King also appeals to pathos, describing the plight of the colored man vividly. King’s audience is largely aware of this situation already, but he uses it to drive them to action rather than simple awareness. On the other hand, Thoreau appeals little to pathos, focusing instead on logic and ethics.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is the first thing that comes to mind when you think of the character of Beowulf? Perhaps a fictional warrior that was a hero to the people of his country? How about someone that "achieved glory before death"? These are just two of many characteristics of the extraordinary character of Beowulf. According to the Mirriam-Webster dictionary, a hero can be defined as "a person who is admired for great or brave acts or fine qualities". After pondering the meaning of this powerful word, it is clear that Beowulf is considered to be a hero of the fifth century. In modern times, however, the word hero is utilized very rarely. Despite this, an exception can be made for one of the most renowned heros of modern day. Like Beowulf, Martin Luther King Jr. can be distinguished as a hero. Both of these heros died fighting for their…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King, in "Civil Disobedience" and "Letter from Birmingham Jail," respectively, both conjure a definitive argument on the rights of insubordination during specified epochs of societal injustice. Thoreau, in his enduring contemplation of life and its purpose, insightfully analyzes the conflicting relationship between the government and the people it governs. He considerately evokes the notion that the majority of people are restrained by the government and society from making decisions with consideration of their conscience and that people need to overcome the reign of the government to realize their own ethics and morals. King, in accordance, eloquently and passionately contends the injustice presented in the unfair treatment of and the discriminatory attitude towards Blacks. Even though, Thoreau successfully accentuates his main concerns in his argument, his effectiveness in persuasion—appeals, conclusion, and practical application—pales in comparison to that of King's.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau and Dr. King lived during two different centuries. So being that they were vocalist and activist on the current issues it's almost certain that they would have a different motive. Even though their motive was 'poles apart', differing in many ways, both Thoreau and Dr. King wrote with the aspiration of obtaining a new form of government presumably resembling the republican one we exercise today. Although awfully controversial, to do so both men felt nonverbal actions such as breaking the laws was the only effective way. In spite of the fact that it's relatively ironic, they viewed going to jail in order to make a mockery of an immoral or impractical laws put in place by the government was "the very highest respect for law (King para. 5)."Henry David Thoreau motive for rebelling against the government was to make it more of a democratic one. He had no respect for the way it was being ran. His proclaimed problem basically summed up to be that he felt the government was being ran like a monarchy, or in other words by a selective few and not an entire society as it should. It simply wasn't up to par according to his standards; for he stated this "I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government (para. 4)."Unlike Henry David Thoreau, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was an African American during the times of segregation.…

    • 506 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The two essays, "Civil Disobedience," by Henry David Thoreau, and "Letter From a Birmingham Jail," by Martin Luther King, Jr., effectively illustrate the authors' opinions of justice. Each author has his main point; Thoreau, in dealing with justice as it relates to government, asks for "not at once no government, but at once a better government. King contends that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Both essays offer a complete argument for justice, but, given the conditions, King's essay remains more effective, in that its persuasive techniques have more practical application. Both essays extensively implement both emotional and ethical appeal to give their respective ideas validity.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The letter was ostensibly conceived in response to a letter that had recently run in a local newspaper which had claimed that the protest were "unwise and untimely." However King also deliberately wrote his letter for a national audience. We believe that King states in the first sentence himself that he does not usually comment upon the criticism of his work. Yes he does criticize the white clergymen but basically he is trying to tell them that they should stop this segregation and that the black are not to be mistreated. Martin Luther Kings "letter from Birmingham Jail" strives to justify the desperate need for nonviolent direct action, the absolute immorality of unjust laws together with what a just law is. King wants to bring to the readers realization the fact that laws are only to be followed when they are rightfully just and correct. He also wants the readers to realize that negroes are not to be mistreated and that the mistreatment of negroes could have severe implications as in a violent protest against the laws made by the court. Mistreatment of this kind is labeled as racial discrimination. He wants the clergyman to realize that what they believe and think is wrong. King gives a singular, eloquent voice to a massive, jumbled movement. 'Letter from Birmingham Jail'"' is a clearly written essay that explains the reasons behind, and the methods of nonviolent civil disobedience, and gently expresses King's disappointment with those who are generally supportive of equal rights for African-Americans. Martin Luther King, more than any other figure, shaped American life from the mid-"'"50s to the late "'"60s. "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice anywhere!" " A just law is man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of the god. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law." " Any law that uplifts human personality is just." " Any law that degrades human personality is unjust." King through this letter tries to express his…

    • 1315 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Suggested Grade Levels: 2-4 Suggested Curriculum Areas: Social Studies and Language Arts Goals: To study M.L.K. and Mahatma Gandhi’s use of nonviolent protest. Objectives: Students will read about the life of Martin Luther King Jr. Students will view a slide show about the life of Mahatma Gandhi. Students will compare and contrast the lives of M.L.K. and Gandhi using a Venn diagram. Background information for teachers on Mahatma Gandhi: Please check out the Center for South Asia’s website http://www.wisc.edu/southasiaoutreach/lessons/figures/figures.htm…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Writers throughout history have turned to a vast array of things for inspiration in their works. The Transcendentalist writers of the 1800s turned to nature in order to discover the higher truths of the world around them. By turning to nature, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau came to teach others how to improve their lives by refusing to conform, expressing integrity of mind, and pursuing one’s dreams. These ideas changed many people’s understanding of the world and continue to do so today. Even though they lived 150 years ago, Emerson and Thoreau’s teachings continue to thrive in the lives of many people such as Ray Charles, Alecia Moore (P!nk), and Stephen Hawking.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essays by Martin Luther King Jr., “Letters From Birmingham Jail” and Henry David Thoreau, “Civil Disobedience” show how one can be a civil person and protest against unfair, unjust laws forced upon them. Both authors are very persuasive in their letter writings. Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. write about the injustice of government laws, of right and wrong, and one’s moral and upstanding conscience of a human being. Martin Luther King Jr. is a religious, peaceful man who uses non-violent rallies to gather American’s to unite against segregation for the greater good and future of America. Henry David Thoreau writes of his own individual rights and those of others, which government opposes unlawful laws of taxes to support a Mexican war and slavery.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written over 114 years after Henry David Thoreau’s essay “Civil Disobedience”, Martin Luther King wrote his most famous essay; “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” In the times of Henry David Thoreau there was only one topic of politics in the United States, slavery. Many southerners wanted to keep slavery while many northerners were against it. Henry David Thoreau was a white northerner that was against slavery, and he was willing to go to jail for it. He proved that in writing his famous letter. In the letter Thoreau describes what it means to be civilly disobedient. In Thoreau’s terms, Civil Disobedience is standing up peacefully against laws you do not think are moral. He was civilly disobedient in not paying poll taxes for over six years because he knew the money was used to support slavery. Martin Luther King was a great civil rights leader that lived in the period of the Civil Rights Movement. King went to jail for a peaceful march against racial hatred after he was specifically told not to march. He was put in a jail in Birmingham for eight days; this is when he wrote his famous letter in response to a letter from eight Alabama clergymen. He was arguing against racial hatred and used the effects of ethos, pathos, and logos to attain his argument. Although Thoreau is formal with his writing and uses plenty of logical reasoning to attain his point, King is more like likely t move the readers due to his ability to reach your emotional side, and his credibility as a leader of the Civil Rights Movement.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The lips of the righteous finds favor, but the mouth of wicked only what is perverse” (New Living Translation, Proverbs 10:32). King Henry VIII lived in England, while Martin Luther was from the German States and Europe. Both men lived completely different lives, and had completely different motives. King Henry VIII was driven by his own wants and needs for the reform. While, Martin Luther was motivated to reform the church for the need to show the truth about God and his persistence to make things right with the Catholic Church. Martin Luther and King Henry VIII both made a movement that changed the church, religion, and thoughts about wealth.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays