Preview

Compare And Contrast Ivan V And Fedor III

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
177 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Ivan V And Fedor III
Alexis Mikhailovich was the Tsar (emperor) of Russia from 1645 to 1676, relishing in a long reign due to his ability to balance the leading boyar families (which was exemplary as the Tsars were dependent on the support of the boyars). Alexis' first wife, Maria Miloslavskaya, died in 1669, but not before giving birth to thirteen children, in which only three survived infancy. One of the three children was a girl named Sophia, and the other two were boys, Ivan V and Fedor III. Unfortunately, both the sons were weak in physique and health. Fedor was very intellectual due to the excellent education from a monk but was terribly disfigured and half paralyzed, whilst Ivan was nearly blind and was physically and mentally impaired, also being disfigured.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ivan IV (or Ivan the Terrible) was the ruler of Russia from 1533-1584. Ivan IV is credited for creating an absolute monarchy in Russia. He gained Mongol land for Russia and expanded the Russian economy on a small scale. Although Ivan IV accomplished these goals for Russia, he does deserve his nickname, Ivan the Terrible. Ivan IV was a very intelligent man, but many people believed that he was mentally ill. This would explain his violent outbursts and his infamous behavior. His troubled childhood might be a possible explanation for his outburst issues.Both of his parents died before he was 8 years old. After his parents death he was faced with constant danger and neglect, which led to him hating the boyar class and torturing small animals as…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    who followed him thought that power was a divine right and should be the absolute…

    • 2269 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan became the Grand Prince of Moscow at the age of three. When his father died due to political intrigues going on at the time. He spent most of his childhood imprisoned in a dungeon while his mother managed affairs of state. Years later when his mother died of what many believe was poisoning. Ivan had reached the level of education necessary to become leader of the country.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Candice Ivan IV, Tsar of Russia is better known as Ivan the terrible. In the following paragraphs I will depict major events in his life and the role he played in Russia. I will also exhibit the many positive things that he did. As well as the negative things that he did to Russian society during his reign of thirty-seven years. I will debate the fact that Ivan IV was nick named Ivan the terrible.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book the ”The Family Romanov” there were many tragedies. In 1894 Russia’s last tsar, Nicholas II, inherited the throne when he was unprepared to do so. Another tragedy was that Nicholas’s only son was a hemophiliac. At the end of the book Nicholas, his wife, and his five children died. Karl Marx once said, “History repeats itself, first as a tragedy, second as farce.”…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries Eastern Europe was marked by two powerful and influential rulers. Frederick the great of Prussia and Peter the Great of Russia. The rise of Prussia and the rise of Russia were comparatively similar, yet both had marked differences.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander was born in 1866. His father, Iyla Nikolaeyich Ulyanov, was an inspector of public schools, credited with the construction of 450 schoolhouses. His mother, Maria, was the daughter of surgeon and landowner. Alexander, nicknamed Sasha, was the oldest of six children. Vladimir was…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Frederick the Great of Prussia displayed similarities throughout his rule to the Russian King, Peter with his military tactics and taxation. During his reign, King Frederick established a great standing army and financed his army by imposing permanent taxation (Wallbank). A strong army was needed to protect the Prussian land and King Frederick built the best standing army in Europe, consisting of 80,000 men. In order to fund his military, Frederick continued permanent taxation on his people. Similarly, King Peter modernized his army of 200,000 men and levied heavy taxes to support his large army (Wallbank). Under his rule, Peter I made the position of a soldier a lifetime job, contributing to his substantial army. As a result to constructing an immense military, Peter enforced an onerous tax on the people. Likewise, both rulers developed large militia and instituted taxes to asset their armies.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Romanovs

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tsar Nicholas II, Tsarina Alexandra, Olga, Tatiana, Maria, Anastasia, and Alexeiand ,Eugene Botkin, Anna Demidova, Alexei Trupp and Ivan Kharitonov…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He had ten children with his second wife, Eudoxia. His eldest son Alexis, just 16 years old, would take the throne the day of his death. For the next three centuries, the Romanov dynasty would rule Russia. Some of the best rulers Russia would ever know, like Peter the Great, were a part of this dynasty.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leaders do what is necessary in order to create a stable and secure country, shaping the country however they please. Tsar Peter the Great was a secular reforming czar that sought to rid xenophobia, and westernize Russia in order to be more modern.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexei, who puzzled the people - they didn’t know about his condition - and was seen as spoiled and unloveable by politicians, was reasonably killed. He followed his father’s way of life, one that the people of Russia greatly disliked. It also made sense that Alexandra, the tsarina, was killed, as the people mistrusted her and Rasputin. Wherever Alexandra went, Rasputin went too. On the other hand, Nicholas’s brother, Grand Duke Michael, was asked to take the throne. (He later on refused) Eventually though, as history tells, most of the Romanov family was led to their deaths. OTMA, on the other hand, were possibly murdered due to the fact that their parentage led people to believe the children would turn out like Nicholas II and Alexandra. Nicholas was actually an uneducated man. “He had few intellectual pretensions” and instead preferred to leave the politics and papers to others. His parents did not bother educating him well either; Nicholas was tutored by average and undesirable people. The upbringing of the tsar helped Nicholas rule the way he did, and look at other people the way he did. The tsar was not very smart, so he sent away all ministers that he thought were more intelligent than him due to superiority belief. The people might have thought that OTMA and Alexei would turn out the same way - as Alexei showed he…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Generally referred to as the 'Last Tsar', his short but significant reign ushered in a revolutionary political system that would change the world. He claimed his throne unprepared after the sudden death of his father "Alexander III". His father rarely taught him the things necessary to control an empire as big as Russia and shortly after this, the country quickly fell into turmoil.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fall Of Tsarism Analysis

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Firstly, as to answering the question Why did Tsarism fall?, unlike revisionists, Pipes argues that the fall of Tsarism was not preordained, there is no specific explanation or reason by itself to answer this question. Pipes uses the example of an apple tree(pg.9); “When you shake an apple tree and apples come cascading down, what “causes” them to fall? Is it the shaking of the tree? Is it the ripeness of the fruit which would have made them fall down, sooner or later, anyway?...In dealing with human events, we find similar levels of explanation, from the most specific to the most general,and it is next to impossible to ascertain which of them determines the…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although they were father and son, the reigns of Alexander II and Alexander III took off in completely different directions. Alexander II was committed to his empire by vowing to reform Russia, making it more in line with nineteenth-century western society. His son, on the other hand, was the unprepared tsar, whose actions were literally reactions to his father’s unexpected assassination. Consequently, Alexander II went down in history as much more productive in the field of domestic policy; in dealing with revolutionaries; and in his foreign policy than his son Alex III would ever be.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays