Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Civil War inevitable

Good Essays
487 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil War inevitable
By the end of 1854 the two sections, the North (Union) and the South (Confederacy) had reached an impasse and that Civil War was inevitable sooner or later. The conflicts grew tension between the two, the manufacturing section of the North and the agricultural South, which led to Civil War. Between the North and the South there were economic, social and political differences. The North had a number of goals concerning slavery and the South. The North wanted to abolish slavery, stop the spread of slavery in the western territories, and the spreading of slavery in Kansas. And the immediate reason for the Civil War was to save the union. While the South wanted to continue slavery, spread slavery throughout the western territories, and ensure establishment in Kansas territory.

Nevertheless, after seizing Mexico and the spreading of territories westward the South depended highly on slavery because of the "cotton king". One of these territories included the Kansas-Nebraska where many newcomers and the proslavery settlers began to move into the territory. In this territory after the 1852 election, the temporary peace of the Compromise of 1850 came to an end. Senator Stephen Douglas passes the Kansas-Nebraska Act which created two new territories of Kansas and Nebraska. The status of slavery in the area was decided to be by popular sovereignty. This act wrecked two compromises The Compromise of 1820, and 1850, and the democratic party. While the act formed a new party: the Republicans.

Throughout many compromises, and conflicts one of the large decisions was the Dred Scott decision. Dred Scott, who had lived in Illinois for 5 years with his master, sued his master for his freedom because Illinois was a free state. The decision concluded by the court ruled that because the slave was a property the master could take them in any area. With this decision it delighted the Southerners', while it made the Northerners' angry.

As the North and the South became angry at each other and took different sides, one of the main conflicts was the election of 1860. The new Republican Party chose Abraham Lincoln for their candidate, which won for president. Now with Lincoln being the president the south felt very uncomfortable since Lincoln wanted a preserve union and anti-slavery. For this reason South Carolina succeed from the union. As later on more states started succeeding from the Union, where they formed the Confederacy. This outraged the North. Now the North and the South had become two different sections, making the Civil was inevitable.

The existence of slavery was the main conflict between the North and the South that led to other conflicts such as the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Dred Scott decision, and the election of President Abraham Lincoln. The conflicts made the Civil War inevitable to escape. The two sections had two different choices the North wanted to abolish slavery while the South the opposite. But after the South seceded the Civil War started.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    His 115 = Civil War

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages

    * Also referred to as “Bleeding Kansas” and allowed territories to determine if they would allow slavery within their boundaries or not…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meanwhile, most southerners were happy with the decision because it allowed them to take slaves with them to free states and territories and reinforced the idea that slaves had no rights as U.S. citizens. Dred Scott's case had caused more trouble between the North and…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act and Dred Scott Case (1857) decision highlighted the slavery disagreement and caused even more problems between the Northern and Southern States, pushing the U.S. even closer to the Civil War. The Kansas-Nebraska Act, passed in 1854 as a small compromise, enforced popular sovereignty in Kansas and Nebraska, creating disagreements over whether these territories would choose to become free or slave states. The Kansas-Nebraska Act even created tensions over the overturned Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had held the nation together by allowing slavery north of the already created line. In result, pro-slavery and anti-slavery groups flooded Kansas and battled in the…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causes of the Civil War

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue on slavery was one of the causes of the Civil War. Slavery and slave trades had become a big part of the South’s economy. During the 19th Century, the North worked hard on abolishing slavery, which they thought was a disgrace to the Union. Compromises were proposed working toward an end to slavery. One of the compromises was the Missouri Compromise, which made Maine, a free state, and Missouri, a slave state, and everything above the 36° 30 north latitude free. Other compromises such as the Compromise of 1850 did please both sides. The Compromise included admitting California as a free state and interstate slave trade to be abolished which went in favor of the North. The Compromise also went with the South when it included stricter fugitive slave laws in document 7, the Kansas Nebraska Act, made it possible for new states to decide if they were going to be free, or slave states. The North and the South were far from settling the slave issue.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery affected many of the political reasons that contributed to causing the Civil War in 1961. Most in the Northern states including President Lincoln were more concerned with preserving the Union rather than fighting for the freedom of all. On the other hand the South fought to preserve what they believed to be absolute state rights. However the overall goals of the war were altered significantly by the willingness of African Americans during war. This also later contributed to the new culture and politics that followed.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott vs. Sanford was a fight over a black slave who was taken to a free state by his owner. Dred Scott, who lived in a slave state Missouri, was taken to the free territory in Illinois and Wisconsin. Scott sued his owner for his freedom claiming that he lived in a free state, thus he had become a free man. The trial finally reached the Supreme Court. The Court ruled that being in free territory does not make a slave free. Dred Scott lost the case and was still considered a slave.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They depended greatly on the North for their industries and factories, because they had very few. They also opposed federal spending on internal improvements and they wanted no tariffs. Even despite having a somewhat weak economy, the South wanted to gain their independence to become their own country, and to have their own way of life, which included slavery as legal. When Abraham Lincoln was elected in 1860, the South thought that they would have no voice in the government, considering that Abraham Lincoln was against slavery. In hopes of being their own country, the South had no intention of fighting a war. However, before the war started, the South was unwilling to compromise. They thought that slavery should be allowed in all of the territories. They disagreed to the Missouri Compromise and to parts of the Compromise of 1850. Many felt that these compromises were unfair and biased. The South felt that their way of life and views on slavery were right and just. They turned to what they thought was their only choice: seceding from the Union. This enrage the North, which was one of the main causes of the Civil War.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bleeding Kansas

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 set the scene by allowing the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide by popular sovereignty, an idea advocated by US Senator Stephan A. Douglas, if they would be free or slave states. The government assumed that few slave owners would attempt to settle in Kansas and make it a slave state, because it was thought to be too far north for profitable exploitation of slaves. Instead, it resulted in immigration to Kansas by activists from both sides, which began the bloody wars of slavery which lasted from 1854 to 1858.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dred Scott was a slave who moved in with his master to the free state of Illinois. He claimed that residence in a free state made him a free man, and he fought for his freedom all the way to the Supreme Court (1865). Chief Justice Taney ruled that since blacks could not be citizens, they had no right to sue in a federal court. The court also went further and said the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred vs. Stanford

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master's widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    North vs South

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The north and south were very different from each other socially and economically. They each had their won interpretations of the Constitution and their differing views creating much conflict. Each conflict gave the two regions their own reasons for entering a Civil War.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Civil War had many causes, some of them were long term causes and some of them were immediate causes. The long term causes were the problems that seemed to never be solved between the North and South. Slavery for instance was a long term problem because it was never completely solved; however continuous compromises were made between both sides, but the disagreements would not disappear. On the other hand, the immediate causes were the problems in which guaranteed that the North and South would have a Civil War. These causes include The Fugitive Slave Act, The Kansas-Nebraska Act and the election of Abraham Lincoln. If these specific events had not occurred, the War would not have happened, but because war was the only option left in attempt to solve the disagreements, the North and South had to have a Civil War.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery and States' Rights

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Southern dependence on a staple crop (mostly cotton), and northern industrialist society caused a contrast between the views of the north and south. While the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed pro- and anti-slavery factions to coexist for a time, growing economic differences between the northern and southern states made it much harder for compromises to exist. In 1850 a very thin majority was willing to accept a North where slavery was barred and a South that had the institution. That was the status quo. Unfortunately, rumors of succession floated the air and concerned many northerners. In a speech to the Senate, Senator Daniel Webster stated, “I hold the idea of a separation of these states-those that are free to form one government and those that are slaveholding to form another- as a moral impossibility.” (Doc D) This is mentioned to show that the states could no separate by any line because they wouldn’t be able to satisfy everyone. The Union must stay together in order to prosper. In 1854, trying to keep the South from succeeding, Sen. Stephen A. Douglas very foolishly got a law passed that changed the status of slavery. Instead of…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sectionalism Dbq

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the mid nineteenth century, sectionalism was increasing, drawing further tension between the north and the south. The Civil War was approaching, as disagreement occurred in the newly occupied territories in the west over slavery law. In 1860, Abraham Lincoln won the election and became president. Lincoln campaigned with a stance that would not allow slavery in the west, but would not remove slave state’s pre-existing laws. Many southern slave states believed the government was pro-north and did not consider the interests of the south, leading to their succession into the Confederate States of America. The main objective of the civil war was to reunite the south with the rest of the union North, while the south was fighting for expansion of state’s rights, with a focus on pro-slavery law. In 1865, Lincoln sent ships to towards the south. This action acted as a catalyst, and the confederacy declared war on the union. By 1863, the Confederate had collapsed economically and diplomatically.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays