Preview

Charitable Split Interest Trusts: Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
480 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Charitable Split Interest Trusts: Case Study
Mary and Jack, a high net worth family, were asking an advice from White about the tax implications if they provide charitable gift each year and whether to donate the proceeds from the sale of the stock or donate the stock to charity directly. The Bradleys’ own a $50 million estate comprised of $40million in securities, $7.5 million of multiple properties and $2.5 million of cash. Their expected wages for the year was $10 million. In 2013, The Bradleys’ has incurred expenses of $1.2 million in item of deduction but were subject to limitation on itemized deduction and their deduction was reduced by $291,000. The Bradleys’ was thought about how they want to dispose their $50 million estate. Two years ago, their daughter has diagnosed with breast …show more content…
A donor can subdivide their assets into claims on income and claims on principle. One claim could be given to the charity and other claims can be given to their beneficiary. Charitable Split Interest Trusts take on two primary forms which is Charitable Remainder Trust and Charitable Lead Trust depending on which claims provided a charity and which is retained. White was considering structuring their $3million donation into a single-life Charitable Annuity Trust with Jack as the beneficiary. Charitable Remainder Trust was depending on the beneficiary as it could give or estate tax implications. If the sole beneficiaries was named after the donor or his/her spouse, the trust will not give any taxable gifts because a taxpayer could not provide gift to himself and the spouse usually have their own deduction for marital. If the trust was named after any other non-charitable beneficiaries, it can be a taxable gift in the year equaled to the present value of the assets. If the Bradleys’ wishes to provide a dependable lifetime income for his family as well as future support for a specific charitable organization, and minimize estate taxes upon their death, a Charitable Remainder Trusts was a very good

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    First of all I would advise them to open a Revocable Living Trust for Willis and one for Wanda and a children’s trust with a spend thrift clause to keep the children from spending their inheritance foolishly. Trust funds up to $5,120,000 are excluded from the estate taxes, so I would fund Wanda’s trust to that amount and, fund Willis’ trust with the rest. This would give them lower estate taxes because they would not be paying on the total amount. These trusts will also avoid probate when the time comes. I would have the children listed as…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wills Law Essay

    • 2439 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Because Jackie left the children real property and the trust, she was trying to make sure that these stayed within the family. Some of the gifts she gave (as in question 3) could be sold or used up, but the real property given to her children and trust of President Kennedy would be more long-term gifts. The trust would also be considered a charitable deduction, so the taxes would be much less. Also, Jackie wanted the estate to pay the taxes so the devisees would not be responsible for the estate and gift taxes.…

    • 2439 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madam Cj Walker

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Madame’s only child, A’Lelia Walker became President of the Madame C.J. Walker Manufacturing Company of Indiana upon her mother’s passing. Per Madame’s will, two-thirds of the stock of the Company was placed in a Trust, over which were five Trustees. The other one-third of the stock of the company was bequeathed to her only child. When A’Lelia died, the one-third share of stock she owned was “split” between two people, each receiving onesixth share. The majority two-thirds remained in the Trust.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The gross estate is determined by adding the value of all the decedent’s property at the time of his death. See 26 U.S.C. § 2031. Property encompasses both real and personal property. It also includes cash, securities, insurance, trusts, annuities, business interests and other assets. In addition to the property that the decedent owned at death, the gross estate will also include transfers made within a 3 year period prior to his death. See 26 U.S.C. § 2035.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Sheila inherited 300 shares of stock, 100 shares of magenta and 200 shares of purple. She has a stockbroker sell the shares for her, use the proceeds for personal expenses, and thinks nothing further about her transactions. What issues does she face when she prepares her Federal income tax return?…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tax Law Research

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * C-2302.1 Can a trust whose governing instrument doesn't authorize charitable contributions deduct its share of contributions by a partnership in which the trust is a partner.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gift Tax Essay

    • 3174 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Normally, gifts to minors are subject to parental / guardian control until the age of majority. In order to delay the transfer of control beyond the age of 18, the funds must be placed in trust. However, the annual gift exclusion ($13,000 per individual and $26,000 per married couple as of 2011) from the gift tax is only available for gifts of so-called current interests. Normally, a gift into a trust that comes under control of the beneficiary at a future date does not constitute a current interest.…

    • 3174 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hunter V Moss Criticisms

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A problem occurs where the wording used is not sufficiently certain as to know what property is intended to be held on trust and where the property that is held on trust is not segregated by the sethlow from a larger amount of similar property he owns. . If a trust fund is not segregated then there will be no certainty of subject matter and the trust will fail. The problem is identifying the property that constitutes the trust fund. The property must be identifiable otherwise the courts would not know which property is to be distributed to the beneficiaries. It must be shown that the sethlow intended to create a trust over specified property.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Living in the south side of Chicago a poor African American family had he opportunity to escape poverty. A 10000 life insurance check upon the death of Lena's husband. Lena has a son named walter. Walter is 35 with a wife and a son. Lena also has a younger daughter named Beneatha. Beneatha Is in college. This money could mean so much for this family and so much more for them individually. So the question in all of this is: what are they gonna do with the money. Walter wants to invest the money into a liquor store. On the other hand the sister Beneatha wants to use the money to go to medical school after college.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Variation of Trust

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Exceptionally, in certain circumstances the terms of the trust can be varied and this prefers be the management and the administration of the trust and can also change the beneficial interest and the idea behind bringing changes of trust is for the benefit of the beneficiary.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The IRS doesn’t care about the probate court or probate avoidance methods on assets. For the purpose of assessing an estate tax, the IRS looks at the gross value of the estate. The gross value is calculated by totaling the value of all property belonging to a decedent, including property in a revocable trust, regardless of how the property is titled. Fortunately, common estates don’t have to worry about estate taxes because the gross value of the estate is less than the exclusion amount that triggers the estate tax. So, estate taxes concern only the large…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Choithram and Pennington

    • 2319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The following is a supplement to the discussion of the Milroy v Lord and Re Rose principles in Equity Trusts relating to the cases of T Choithram International SA v Pagarani 2001 2 All ER 492 and Pennington v Waine 2002 4 All ER 215. These cases confirm the existing law for the most part, although in factual circumstances which have occasioned comment by some jurists. The Underlying Principle in Milroy v. Lord An imperfect gift will not be perfected simply by interpreting the donor to be a trustee of the property which was to have been the subject matter of that gift, nor will an incompletely constituted trust be rendered effective so as to aid a volunteer in neither case will equity perfect an imperfect transfer of property. That much was made evident in the judgment of Turner LJ in Milroy v Lord . Turner LJ expressed this principle in terms that for a settlement to be effective the settlor must have done everything which, according to the nature of the property comprised in the settlement, was necessary to be done in order to transfer the property and render the settlement binding upon him. The rigour of this principle that equity will not assist a volunteer by perfecting an imperfect gift appears to have been diluted by a statement of Lord Browne-Wilkinson to the effect that although equity will not aid a volunteer, it will not strive officiously to defeat a gift. The Re Rose principle In Re Rose (1952), the registered owner of shares executed two share transfers, one in favour of his wife absolutely by way of gift and the other in favour of two people (including his wife) on trust. The shares were in a private company, which empowered the board of directors to object to the transfer of shares. The transferor had completed all the formalities required of him only ratification by the board of directors remained before the transfer was complete. The date of transfer was again important so that Roses estate could demonstrate that the voluntary transfer had…

    • 2319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Secret trusts arise where a testator explains to X that they want property to be held on trust for Y and then leaves the property to X in their Will. It is also possible that a secret trust arises where in reliance on a promise to implement the trust by X, no Will is made (Strickland v Aldridge 1804 9 Ves 516 REF1). The onus of proving a secret trust is on the person claiming that it exists, on the balance of probabilities - the 'ordinary civil standard of proof' (Re Snowden 1979 3 All ER 172 REF2). There are three elements necessary for a secret trust (Ottaway v Norman (1971) 3 All ER 1325 REF3). Intention The Testator must intend that the property be used in accordance with a direction. This must be intended as a binding obligation on the trustee, not merely an "unfettered discretion". (Re Snowden (REF2), McCormick REF44, Margulies v Margulies and others [2000] All ER (D) 344 REF4 on 'precatory words'). Communication The Testator must communicate their intention to the intended trustee, along with the terms of the trust. An example may be a sealed envelope to be opened on the testator's death, provided that the intended trustee knows the property is to be dealt with in accordance with the contents of the envelope (Obiter in Re Boyes (1884) 26 ChD 531 REF5, and confirmed in Re Keen 1937 Ch 236 REF6). A mere request to hold "as instructed by any papers left with the will" would not amount to acceptable communication. Oral communication is effective but in the case of a half secret trust, must be consistent with the terms of the Will (Re Keen REF6). If however the intended trustees do not find out about the intentions until after the testator's death, there will be no secret trust (Wallgrave v Tebbs 1855 2 K & J 313 REF7). Agreement There must be agreement or acquiescence, including silent acquiescence (Moss v Cooper 1861 1 John & H 352 REF8) of the intended trustee, which may be express or implied (Wallgrave v Tebbs 1855 REF7). If there is no evidence of the trust…

    • 2784 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Franking Credit

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The beneficiaries' entitlement to the trust property or income (or both), and the way in which this is fulfilled, is fixed by the trust deed. The trustee has no discretion to alter the prescribed entitlement of the beneficiaries. Very few trusts (if any) are wholly fixed because the trustee generally has some element of discretion.l…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charitable Purpose Trusts

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thompson v FCT – Dixon J distinguishes between groups which arise because of personal ties and groups which arise from a common calling (public/private distinction)…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays