Preview

Case Brief: Zuckerman vs Antenucci

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
950 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Brief: Zuckerman vs Antenucci
Case Brief: Zuckerman v. Antenucci

Sophia Haberman

LAW/531

December 01, 2010
Dr. Maurice Rosano

Case Study: Zuckerman v. Antenucci

Partnership liability tort can take place when a partner or all partners acting on partnership business causes injury to a third person. Cause of this tort could be a negligent act, a breach of trust, breach of fiduciary duty, defamation, fraud, or another intentional tort (Cheeseman, 2010, p. 538). Under the Uniform Partnership Act, partners are jointly and severally liable for torts and breaches of trust (UPA, 2010). This is true even if the co-partner(s) did not participate in the act. The joint and severally liable tort permits a third party to sue one or more of the partners separately; however, monetary damages can be collected only against the partners who are sued.
Facts of the Case

Medical doctors, Jose Pena and Joseph Antenucci were partners in a medical practice. Elaine Zuckerman was a patient of both Dr. Pena and Dr. Antenucci during her pregnancy. When her son Daniel Zuckerman was born, she discovered there were severe physical problems. Zuckerman, as Daniel’s mother and guardian, brought a medical malpractice suit against both of the doctors. In trial court, the jury found that Dr. Pena was guilty of medical malpractice but that Dr. Antenucci was not. A judgment against Dr. Pena was entered but not against Dr. Antenucci, in the form of $4 million. The plaintiffs appealed for judgment against both defendants.
Plaintiff’s Position Mrs. Elaine Zuckerman claimed both doctors were liable for her son’s condition. She believed both doctors were liable concerning their general partnership and the simple fact that they both gave her treatment during her pregnancy.
Defendants Position Drs. Antenucci and Pena refuted the charges.
Review of the Supreme Court’s Decision Upon review of the case, the Supreme Court determined that both partners were jointly and severally liable for the



References: Cheeseman, H.R. (2010). Business Law (7th ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. UPA. (2010).Uniform Partnership Act, 1914. Retrieved from http://lawschool.mikeshecket.com/ba/uniformpartnershipact1914.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the case presented for discussion described above, it was imminent that Dr. Yarnell had a justifiable medical history that supported his symptoms. Nonetheless, it can be argued the way PA Brian decided to evaluate and treat Dr. Yarnell was biased or based on personal interests. PA Brian’s medical judgment was compromised. Mutual personal motivations existed between Dr. Yarnell and PA Brian. However, as a clinician PA Brian should have impartially evaluated Dr. Yarnell by properly and examining and documenting his findings or properly redirecting Dr.Yarnell to a different clinician. If the patient (Dr. Yarnell) was never appropriately examined, how can PA Brian as a health care provider substantiate that the medication prescribed was adequate and beneficial for the…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lit1 Task 310.1.2-01-06

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages

    LIABILITY – Partners are personally liable for all of the business debts and obligations. This also includes court judgments.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Medical Malpractice

    • 5400 Words
    • 22 Pages

    The outcomes of medical malpractice lie in the following explanation of perspectives, referred to as “the good, the bad, and the ugly.” This paper provides a presentation of facts of the two highest single-incident medical malpractice lawsuits in Connecticut: Daniel Jacob D’Attilo et al. v. Richard Viscarello et al. (Case 1) and Elizabeth Oram and Simon Oram as Parents and Next Friends of Spencer Oram at al. v. Corinne E. De Cholnoky, M.D. et al. (Case 2) A brief summary of each case, entitled “Sum it Up” will precede the presentation of facts to give the basic premise and overview of events leading up to each trial. Both cases resulted in significant economic compensation to the plaintiff for damages of negligent infliction of emotional distress. After a description of each case, an analysis of the legal and ethical issues will be presented. This analysis will compare and contrast the view in three sections, entitled “the good, the bad, and the ugly” the patient (or plaintiff), doctor (or defendant), and lawyers. While the “good” and “bad” are clear, the “ugly” will specifically target the categorical imperative of the patient, doctor, and lawyers in these two lawsuits. After the positive and negative effects of these cases are revealed, several solutions will be identified with the hope of decreasing frivolous lawsuits, health care costs, and excessive medical bills.…

    • 5400 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    EMTALA Case Summary

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is appropriate that the patient was awarded $25,000 attorney fees. Regardless of the potential Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) violation, the patient vicariously through her family and friends was forced to seek injunction against Memorial Hospital enjoining the hospital from refusing to admit the patient. She further incurred cost in her subsequent action, which are rightly reimburse based on the findings of the court. With regard to the permanent junctive relief to prevent egregious acts from evading review in the future. The plaintiff would appear to have little benefit because of her does not change, she has the potential to become pregnant in the future and require future medical care and delivery. This…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law 531 Case 5.1

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rules: The case was adjudicated on the basis of negligence law. Negligence is “the omission to do something which a reasonable man would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.” Among others, negligence law takes into consideration: duty of care, breach of duty of care, injuries caused by defendant’s negligent act(s), and the likes. (Cheeseman, 2013). A particular negligence law considered during this case was negligence per se.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital, Dr. Alexander’s way of treating the patient is a great example of medical malpractice. Although the failure to follow the adequate standard of care might have been unintentional, it resulted in a very significant and permanent damage to the patient. When a patient chooses to go to a hospital to seek medical attention, he or she expects the facility to treat him with excessive care. In this case, the jury found negligence by both Dr. Alexander as well as in the nursing staff in regards to the follow ups as the medical record supported the evidence. I strongly believe that both the physician as well as the hospital (unless the physician was an independent contractor) are both responsible…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Niles vs. San Rafael, the primary issue at hand is negligence on the behalf of Mount Zion hospital, the City of San Rafael, the public school district, and pediatric physician Dr. David Haskins. Negligence, as it pertains to health care, is defined as a failure to act with reasonable care, and results in injury or detriment to any patient or other individual. In connection to a head injury Niles sustained while at a ball field, all of the previously named have been held liable for Niles’ permanently incapacitated state.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dr Mccall Paper

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Read the case study in Ch. 4 of Medical Law and Ethics that begins, “Jerry McCall is Dr. William’s office assistant.”…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 3 Complaint

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Joint and several liability is allowed in many states. This type of liability may apply to business partners who form a general partnership, or to two or more individuals when someone is injured due to negligence. Joint and several liability is different than when two or more individuals are jointly liable for an obligation. Joint and several liability gives an injured party a better chance of recovering damages because he may pursue any one of the parties who are jointly and severally liable for the injury.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Helling V. Carey

    • 4538 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Historically it has been the state legislature’s responsibility to establish, implement and regulate the medical tort system and laws and guidelines related to them (Conover, Zeitler, p.1). There is, however, a potential hazard of the judiciary getting involved in establishing medical standards of care based on facts of a single case rather than on the standards of the profession (King, p.1236-37). In a sense, the issue is approached from a semantic and factual rather than medical standpoint. Helling v. Carey is a good example of such a case which excited considerable comment in the medical and legal fields. In the final analysis the case is considered unique and controversial mainly because the court dismissed the standards of medical profession and imposed its own standard in the field. Most states, however, have largely rejected the medical custom and have adopted the standard of a reasonably prudent physician.…

    • 4538 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discussion Questions

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case that I chose to write on came from our textbook, but I did some additional research online and found more information on this particular case. The case involves a mother and father who filed a wrongful death suit against their OB/GYN’s for the wrongful death of their unborn son. Initially, the court found in favor of the physicians, but after an appeal process to the U. S. Supreme Court of Appeals, they were granted a judgment in their favor.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Advanced Directives Essay

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Fremgen, B. F. (2009). Medical Law and Ethics. (3rd Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Polovchak V Meese

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issue: Was the entry of summary judgment on behalf of the parents proper? Was the remedy appropriate given due consideration to both the parents and the child?…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper we will review the medical malpractice case filed with the Brooklyn Supreme Court, Weber v. New York Columbia Presbyterian Hospital. I will discuss how this case is more than a medical malpractice case, that it is a case about change and how one father vows to change the way health care is carried out. I will also discuss the possible outcomes in this emotional case, as well as predicting the likely verdict in favor of the plaintiffs.…

    • 2147 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays