Preview

Carolingian Empire and Charlemagne History

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2234 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Carolingian Empire and Charlemagne History
Charlemagne

History 101 - Fast Forward Fall 1996 PREPARED BY: SUBMITTED: September 30, 1996

Charlemagne, or Charles the Great, King of the Franks (742-814), was a strong leader who unified Western Europe through military power and the blessing of the
Church. His belief in the need for education among the Frankish people was to bring about religious, political, and educational reforms that would change the history of Europe.

Charlemagne was born in 742 at Aachen, the son of Pepin(or Pippin) the Short and grandson of Charles Martel. His grandfather, Charles, had begun the process of unifying western Europe, in the belief that all people should be Christian.
Charlemagne's father, Pepin, continued this process throughout his rule and passed his beliefs on to Charlemagne. All three, in addition to the political unification, believed that the church should be reformed and reorganized under the Pope, which helped their rise to power as the Carolingian Dynasty. (Holmes
74)

Upon Pepin's death in 768, Charlemagne and his brother, Carloman, each inherited half of the Frankish kingdom. Pepin, in the Merovingian tradition of the time, split his kingdom between his two sons. Three years later Carloman died and
Charlemagne took control of the entire kingdom. He inherited great wealth and a powerful army, built by his father and grandfather. Charlemagne used the army and his own skillful planning to more than double the size of the Frankish
Kingdom. (Halsall 15)

The world of Charlemagne was a heathen one, with many warring tribes or kingdoms.
Many of these tribes were conquered by Charlemagne, among them the Aquitanians, the Lombards, the Saxons, the Bretons, the Bavarians, the Huns, and the Danes.
The longest of these battles was against the Saxons, lasting thirty-three years.
Charlemagne actually defeated them many times, but due to their faithlessness and their propensity to return to their pagan lifestyle, the Saxons lost many



Cited: Boussard, Jacques, The Civilisation of Charlemagne. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1968

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    European monarchy was in full force between 1400 and 1800, in a variety of nations and ways. Phillip II of Spain and Fredrick William the 1st of Prussia were monarchs with similar approaches in terms of absolutist reign accompanied by a strong military, yet they differed on foreign policy, economics, and religion.…

    • 648 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.) Charlemagne also called Charles the great from seven hundred and forty-seven after death to eight hundred and fourteen after death, had a brilliant plan which led to fifty-four military campaign. Only eight thousand men were ready for fight during the spring months. In seven hundred and seventy-three after death, he led his army to Italy, devastated the Lombards, and took over the Lombard state. Four years later, Charlemagne traveled to Spain. He was thinking the more successful with his eastern marches into Germany, especially the Saxon who settled between and long side the Elbe River and the North Sea. Charlemagne took over the Bavarians in southern Germany in Seven hundred and eighty-seven after death. This newly conquered land was added to his empire by the following year. Charlemagne…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    No matter where an empire is located, maintaining a vast empire always comes with many hardships, and the Roman and Chinese Empires were no exception. In the time of city-states, the Romans had developed a Republican form of government, which successfully met its needs. However, the Romans failed to develop a new form of government that catered to the demands of an expanding empire, resulting in the fall of the Republic, and Roman emperors were never able to develop an effective ideology of rule. Coupled with armies' loyalties to generals rather than the state, the empire was prone to bloody civil wars and frequent change in rulers who only reigned for several months or years. Also, the empire's obsession with expanding and protecting its borders also led to an increased demand for military service, after which many small farmers had no work, leading to growing populations stuck in poverty and prone to riots. Furthermore, these small farms, which used to produce grain, were replaced, and the empire had to rely on imported grain for sustenance. These events led to the third century crisis, in which the Roman Empire faced a period in which political, military, and economic problems nearly destroyed the empire. China, despite being located in a different hemisphere, faced incredibly similar problems. Both the Roman and Chinese Empires had significant political and social turmoil due to conflicts between independent regions over power. Because it was impossible to communicate any faster than the speed of a horse, empires relied on autonomous local leaders to maintain control. However, many local leaders and military generals being more interested in their own political power, which led to internal conflicts and civil wars. The expanding borders also required greater protection, and both of the administrative centers of these empires were located far from its long borders. In order to maintain and protect its borders, the…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China and Rome were two of the most powerful and popular empires of their time, but they fell like any other empire before them. Han China and Rome’s Empires had the same causes for their declines, but their effects are different.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay #1-Compare and Contrast the Han and Roman Empires in terms of their technological achievements…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1066 Year of the Conquest

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Specific short answer questions to help you read and understand the material and to answer the two main questions?…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early two hundred C.E. and four hundred C.E. two major empires came to an end, the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty. The empires’ leaders greed and desire for more led to the decline and eventual fall of both the Roman Empire and the Han dynasty. The social interactions with their opposers combined with the catastrophic economic misfortunes also contributed to their decline. There were many reasons why the Han and Roman empires collapsed politically, socially, and economically.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alcuin and Charlemagne

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charlemagne was the king of the Franks from 768 to 814. He was known to be the most powerful Christian ruler and brought success to his country. Charlemagne was well educated and good looking. His strong voice allowed him to express what he had to say in a very eloquent manner. He was most famous for doubling the territory that his father had previously conquered. With his determination and persistence, Charlemagne became one of the most dignified rulers of the early middle ages.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion is one of the pillars of society. It can be used to rule the common with fair and just practice or it can be used for a rulers own self-improvement and greed. Many times over the course of world history religion is misconstrued and leads individuals to believe self-interrupted version of its holy text. Two of the most prominent religions in world history Islam and Christianity were used to empower those in high authority. This point is made clear with the documents discussed, and show readers that religion is nothing more than tool for the intellect to take advantage of the common masses of society.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becoming Charlemagne

    • 2321 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Becoming Charlemagne, written by Jeff Speck. This book written by Jeff Speck, chronicles events around the life of a Germanic king name Karl. Becoming Charlemagne is a factual account of the events that took place in the empires of A.D 800. Jeff Sypeck explains key events in this time period and illustrates how the king Karl became the legend Charlemagne.…

    • 2321 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman empire and the Han empire collapsed for similar reasons as well as some different reasons. Firstly, both Rome and China’s governments became an ineffective way to control an empire. Secondly, nomadic tribes invaded both Rome and China. These tribes broke into their respective empires and laid waste to the land. Yet differences exist between the collapse of the two empires. A large part of the collapse of Rome was due to inflation. The Han empire was not as affected by inflation as the Roman empire was. The external invasions that caused the collapse of the Roman empire and the Han empire could be compared to invasive species from the realm of Biology.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Looking back at history, an individual usually can find an incredible amount of information about any given period in any given part of the world. Yet as varied are the history books, so are the biases which they each present. We see one example of these biases in Einhard's The Life of Charlemagne in which this adviser and close friend to the great Frankish king gives his history of Charlemagne's life. One issue that Einhard repeatedly touches on is the virtually uninterrupted series of wars that the Frankish Kingdom under 'Charles the Great' undertook. Throughout the individual accounts of these war, Einhard attempts to justify Charlemagne's military career.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There were 3 main reasons why The Romans wante to conquer Britain: 1st Big amount of corn; 2nd Rome was a slave owning society and they needed more slaves; 3rd In the first century b.c. Rome was in war with Gaul and the Celts from Britain helped Gaul to fight against the Romans. It took 98 years for the Roman to conquer a part of Britain known today as England. 55 years b.c. Julias Caesar undertook the first attempts but failed because of the very strong Celtic opposition . 54 years b.c. Caesar came back with an army of 25.000 people and conquered a small territ near present day London . His aim, however, was not to conquer the territ as such, he took everything he wanted (corn, slaves) introduced heavy taxes Celtseparted. 43 years a.d. (after Jesus was born) Emperor Claudius finally conquered the territ of pres day England and pushed the Celts, who lived there to the less furtile and more mountains area of present day Scottland and Wales.…

    • 755 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays