Preview

Can Animal Rights Go Too Far Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
929 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Can Animal Rights Go Too Far Analysis
How would you feel if you were caged in and force fed? Animals, around the world, are being abused like that by many humans, every year. They are being chained up, their furs are being pulled straight off from their bodies, and they are being severely abused. Moreover, animal societies and the government started to take action to fight for animal rights. In the article Can Animal Rights Go Too Far?, Adam Cohen explains how animals are being treated and how they are sold to the market. Just like humans, animals have lives, too. They deserve better treatment and care. Therefore, the government should enhance making laws for animal rights, in addition to human rights. Many chickens are being caged in small spaces where they are unable to stand, spread their wings out, produce eggs. These conditions make the chicken’s health worse. Many animal protectors consider this animal abuse and animal cruelty. In the Times article Can Animal Rights Go Too Far?, Cohen stated that the government recently created a new law, in California, that “Cages will have to be large enough for the birds to stand up, lie down and spread their wings without touching each other or the sides of the cage”(Cohen). Also, because these actions are viewed as “torture to animals”, myriads of egg producers, today, provide the chickens a better shelter. Chickens are not …show more content…
He used pathos in his article to make the readers feel empathy towards the animals being abused by explaining the situation they are in with great details of how the condition of the shelter was like and how they are fed by humans. Adam also used logos and stated facts from animal societies to describe how they can help the animals provide better shelters or care. Although, he did not use pathos in his article and he did not put more detailed evidence in his article which lead to making this argument less

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the book the narrator’s view is totally opposite. He assumes and thinks that keeping animals in cages is normal to them and they don’t mind… He persuades us to think that animals are perfectly fine and find it normal to be kept in cages “Animals like being in the same cages, it’s like their home, There is no place like home? That’s certainly what animals feel.” According to him animals would rather live in a…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "The Case for Animal Rights," Tom Regan writes about his beliefs regarding animal rights. Regan states the animal rights movement is committed to a number of goals, including: "the total abolition of the use of animals in science; the total dissolution of commercial animal agriculture; and the total elimination of commercial and sport hunting and trapping. Regan goes on and tells us the "fundamental wrong is the system that allows us to view animals as our resources, here for us--to be eaten, or surgically manipulated, or exploited for sport or money." Once people accept this view of animals being here for our resources, they believe what harms the animal doesn't really matter. Regan explains that in order to have this changed, people must change their beliefs. If enough people, especially people that hold a public office, change their beliefs, there can be laws made to protect the rights of animals.…

    • 684 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Steven M. Wise, a teacher and lawyer at Harvard is educating students and standing up for Animal Rights. He hopes to achieve the goal of getting the first non-human animals their rights.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The mass production of food especially the production of chickens should be classified as animal abuse. Food Inc. shows corporate chicken houses packed with chickens…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speech Animal Abuse

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal abuse is a topic that most people are aware of in this day and age. But to clarify this is not going to be a speech appealing to the pity of Sarah McLachlan's song during animal cruelty commercials. Believe me this topic is truly sad, but its gets worse when you look into the current problems. I will elaborate on what is currently being done. The SPCA is a very large benefactor in stopping animal abuse as many of you probably know by their numerous commercials asking for donations and public awareness but they cannot take this entire burden on their shoulders alone. The type of animal abuse I would like talk about is specific to farm animals. This is a particular topic that many people do not consider. The example i am going to use first is the life of a cow and then elaborate on chickens. A female cow on a dairy farm is repetitively impregnated, again, and again for the production of milk. Hundreds of cows residing on thousands of dairy farms across america are artificially inseminated to constantly produce milk for our consumption. After a time of nine months the cow gives birth to a calf, within hours or a day the calf is taken from the mom and transported to a veal…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imagine this, you live your whole life in a cage as big as your body, you get no exercise, freedom nor can you communicate with anyone. The only thing you get food and a shabby place to live. Would you want to live a life like that? That is what happens to millions of animals across the world, whether it may be in a first, second or third world country. The value of animals is often forgotten when dealing with them. Animals should have their own set of rights that protect them from abuse, neglecting and wrong treatment. Recent ethology research has proven that animals have the intellectual ability to feel and react to complex emotions (anger,…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do human beings have any obligations to animals in terms of their treatment? If it is wrong to treat animals cruelly, why is it not wrong to eat them? Explain if, and how, you think humans can find a balance between treating animals ethically while also raising them for food and for other reasons, such as the testing of pharmaceuticals.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We wouldn’t force our pets to live in filthy, cramped cages for their whole lives, and we shouldn’t force farm animals to endure such misery, either. All animals, including those raised for food, deserve protection from this abuse.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Animals should not be used for enjoyment or exploitation because they cannot consent to being used for production, to be tested on, or to be in various shows. Would you put your child in a situation where they do not consent to it?”…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When God created man, he also created other living creatures and every living creature has their own right to be on this planet. However , we humans being the superior in power and thoughts, somehow forget these things most of the time. Some people think that animals do deserve the rights as we humans to live; while other thinks that they are more for food and medical research.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal rights protect species from mistreatment by humans. The advocates of this regulation demand that the government establish more laws governing the rights for animals because of their empathy toward animals, similarities to human behavior, moral status, and biomedical research. They mandate equal rights to all species; however, I believe the existing laws are adequate and should not be expanded, but enforced and have minor changes.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer’s Theory of equal consideration for animals means that animals should be equal rights with respect to their particular interests. If a bird’s interest is to lay eggs, nest, fly and eat. It should be left to those interests. Different animals species have different interests. Implications of this would be an animal would not work a farm, be used in research, be served on the dinner table or any other activity that might remove it from the normal interests of its species. The fundamental problem with this idea is that animal interests are not always good for human interests. Mice could be argued to have no other interests than to eat, breed, and nest. These interests would normally not be a problem however mice damage wiring and leave urine and feces everywhere they inhabit. Inside homes and buildings mice can cause dangerous conditions and serious health hazards for humans. Is putting out various mousetraps and poisons therefore not treating mice fairly with regards to allowing them to pursue their interests despite the disastrous health consequences for man? If mankind were to subscribe to Peer Singers theory it is likely most present methods for dealing with rodent infestations would be outlawed because they would be deemed to cause unnecessary suffering. Animal experimentation to prove safety of medicines, health care products and beauty products would all but be eliminated. Research would suffer greatly and the possibility of humans being experimented on far too early in the stage of development of medicines might start becoming standard practice. Though I do feel strongly that no wasteful and malice torture of animals should be allowed to take place; I believe assigning rights to animals and bringing them to equal status of the human species would only serve to devalue human life. Singer’s belief that it would never be unjustifiable to experiment on severely brain damaged humans really…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Rights

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Rollin, Bernard E. "Factory Farming Is Unethical." Animal Rights. Ed. Shasta Gaughen. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Contemporary Issues Companion. Rpt. from "Farm Factories." Christian Century 118 (Dec. 2001): 26. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 29 Nov. 2012.…

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There has been an ongoing debate on the rights of animals. Animal rights seek to guarantee animals with a sense of entitlement. Some people tend to oppose animal rights stating that animals are inferior to human beings and should be used by to meet human needs. In this manner, animals are not exempt from captivity and maltreatment. On the other hand, supporters of animal rights argue that animals have a right to live a life free from suffering. They also argue that animals should not be discriminated against due to their species. Furthermore, proponents of animal rights also argue that human beings are not superior to animals. Animal’s rights should be upheld by all human beings and activities such as hunting, animal testing and animal farming should either be regulated or completely eliminated.…

    • 2012 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Day in and day out, vicious and heinous crimes are being committed on factory farmed animals due to the demands of food from this obese generation of people. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, nearly 10.2 billion land animals were brought up and killed for food in the United States throughout 2010. Plus, per person, an American meat-consumer is responsible for the suffering and death of 28 land animals per year (“Number of”). Animals have little to no rights when it comes to protection than that of humans. Therefore, humans often do whatever they want to animals for meat—knowing that they will get away with it. Of the estimated 10.2 billion land animals killed in 2010, roughly 91% were chickens raised for meat; this just goes…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays