Preview

Balfour's Leadership Was Responsible for the Decline in the Popularity of the Conservative Party Between the Years 1902-1906. Explain Why You Agree or Disagree with This View.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
985 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Balfour's Leadership Was Responsible for the Decline in the Popularity of the Conservative Party Between the Years 1902-1906. Explain Why You Agree or Disagree with This View.
Balfour's leadership was responsible for the decline in the popularity of the conservative party between the years 1902 – 1906.
Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. ( 24 marks )

Balfour's leadership along with other key factors, including chamberlain's influence, the Boer war and the liberal party's actions, overall led to the decline in popularity for the conservative party giving the liberals their first taste of power in the 1906 general election.

Balfour's character consisted of a very cautious, indecisive man which came across when faced with Chamberlain and his debate on 'tariff reform', which stated that all non-British colonies should have to pay tariffs on imports into Britain, making foreign goods more expensive. At this time free trade was thoroughly indented into British society and nearly all voters were against the idea. Despite Balfour expressing his opinion that he had no settled convictions for tariff reform, when he was faced with the endorsement of tariff reform by a 'retaliationist' who embraced tariffs as the most effective means of forcing protectionist nations to the negotiating table, Balfour consistently rejected the protectionist argument which Chamberlain endorsed. When its ambiguity provoked conflict within the Conservative Party, Balfour’s failure to clarify his policy or assert his authority only exacerbated the confusion and bitterness. Balfour’s reputation paid a high price for this indecisive leadership. If this wasn't enough Balfour resigned in 1905 without asking for a general election, leaving the party extremely angry and had to appoint Campbell-Bannerman to take his place.
Not only did Balfour anger the Conservative party, he also annoyed the working class. He failed to recognise that taking no action of the 'Taff Vale' incident was an unpopular move. The railway workers on the Taff Vale railway went on strike in 1901. The management replaced them with National free labour association workers and then

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This was the first time the Liberals were reunited since the Boer war. This aided them in an attempt to reunite there votes aswell. This meant that they were the second biggest party after the conservatives. All they needed to do was show the weaknesses of Balfour. The final nail in the coffin was having a decisive manifesto over free trede and how they refused to do it in case it harmed the working class. It was most important to appease the working class because they were the majority of the vote but they were also the poorest people able to vote with decisiveness.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1865 and 1900, American industry workers experienced both good and hard times. Labor Unions were forming, and these new creations often produced better lives for the workers. However, waves of immigrants were also coming into America, which resulted in the threat of job stability. Labor Unions and Immigration both had momentous effects upon the industry worker, for better or for worse.…

    • 905 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This lack of progress was also due to a general downturn in the economy: caused by WW1 and the growth of competition abroad. A policy of retrenchment was introduced after a short boom. Retrenchment did not allow the kind of reform people wanted. Lloyd George earned the anger of workers wanting reforms by refusing to nationalize mines and using heavy-handed tactics dealing with a strike in Glasgow. Had Lloyd George not been part of the coalition would he have adopted this policy and lost the sizeable support of the miners? Or was nationalization not practical and fear of revolution justified? Lloyd George's stance and Liberals in general also were confused on issues such as industrial relations. In the polarization of politics that was happening the Liberal party in the middle didn't seem to have an obvious set of principles that were relevant to the unfolding century…

    • 945 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both men, who served as Prime Ministers, reformed many institutions with many of them effecting the working class like education (bringing up the working class), trade union (helping the working class fight for work wrights), public health (living conditions affecting the working class) and licensing (the way many working class people passed the time), along with the electoral institution (workers being able to vote on the matters which the work upon, such as factory conditions and education). Many historians, such as William Kuhn, argue that William Gladstone, the Liberal Prime Minister, passed many other reforms as well to help the working class, including the Ballot Act of 1872. However, some historians, such as Monypenny and Buckle, say that Benjamin Disraeli, the Conservative Prime Minister, did more to help the working class, including passing the Second Great Reform Act of 1867.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The leaders of the Labour Party were terrified by the revolutionary elements within the union movement or at least worried about the damage association with them would do to their newly established reputation as a more moderate party of government and were unhappy about the proposed general strike. During the next two days, frantic efforts were made to reach an agreement with the government and the mine owners. However, these efforts failed, mainly owing to an eleventh-hour decision by printers of the Daily Mail to refuse to print an editorial ("For King and Country") condemning the general strike. They objected to the following passage: "A general strike is not an industrial dispute. It is a revolutionary move which can only succeed by destroying the government and subverting the rights and liberties of the people". When Baldwin heard of this, he called off the negotiations with the TUC, saying that the printers' action was interfering with the liberty of the press.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WW1 changed the position of the LIberal Party significantly because of many factors. One major change would have been Asquith stepping down as leader. This was because he was seen as not being able to lead the war, the public disliked the way in his methods with events such as the Shell crisis which led to thousands of unneeded deaths. This was were Lloyd George took over as he was seen fit to lead this war, or control the many issues which Asquith and his former War representative Kitchener could not.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Never give in! Never give in! Never, never, never, never, never -- in nothing great or small, large or petty -- never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense.” (Winston Churchill) “Universally acclaimed as one of the greatest statesmen who ever lived, Winston Churchill served Great Britain for over sixty years in various capacities, including prime minister during World War II” (“Winston Churchill”). He passed numerous in acts in favor of the people, made countless speeches which are still famous till this day and most importantly, “rallied the British people during World War II and led his country from the brink of defeat to victory”…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    germany from 1900-1935

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ruling liberal government, which was The Liberal government of 1896 to 1915 was be-set by many different problems, these…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lloyd-George held a massive majority and popularity in 1918 as he seemed irremovable from office, this was however starkly contrasted by the 1922 election where his popularity drastically dropped and he managed only to scrap the bottom of the barrel for votes leaving him with only a small amount of seats. There were many reasons for this one of the most important ones was his own mistakes; such as how he faced a lot of problems on the issue of Germany, and how he should deal with it. He required a strong Germany for trade, however the populace of Britain was out for blood on Germany for in their eyes causing World War 1. In the end he led a middle of the ground stance between Roosevelt and Clemenceau. This was met with opposition who believe that he was too soft on Germany. This effected people’s opinions of him quite a bit, as he promised to “bleed Germany dry” and didn’t deliver, furthermore a lot of people’s relatives had died during WW1 leading to them seeing revenge as not being delivered. Another key issue he faced was the Irish crisis, which had been plaguing Britain for the early half of the 20th century. Even after he passed the Home Rule Bill which gave limited self-government to Ireland Sinn Fein the independence movement was still popular, this was partly due to during the war the self-government was revoked, and after the Easter rising their opinion in Ireland had spike to an all-time high. This was also polarised by the Ulster nationalist who believed that all the nationalists were “Traitors and deserved to be shot.” This then escalated and led to an all-out civil war in Ireland between the Ulster Nationalists/British and the IRA. LG decided to form the Black and Tans a counter terrorist movement to try and stop the IRA, however most of them were Ulster nationalists and ruthless towards the southerners even those who were innocent. This gained the support…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Churchill later regarded this as the greatest mistake of his life. However in discussions at the time with former Chancellor McKenna, Churchill acknowledged that the return to the gold standard and the resulting 'dear money' policy was economically bad. In those discussions he maintained the policy as fundamentally political—a return to the pre-war conditions in which he believed. In his speech on the Bill he said "I will tell you what it [the return to the Gold Standard] will shackle us to. It will shackle us to reality."…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour Party

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To what extent was party policy the most important factor in the fluctuating fortunes of the Labour party 1900-45?…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    he was elected to the Parliament as a Conservative, and he quickly made his mark.…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chamberlain

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During his early adulthood he was a radical Liberal Party member and a campaigner for educational reform. As a self-made businessman who never attended university, he had contempt for the aristocracy. He entered the House of Commons aged almost forty, relatively late in life for a front-rank politician. Rising to power through his influence with the Liberal grassroots organisation, he served as President of the Board of Trade in Gladstone's Second Government (1880–85). At the time, Chamberlain was notable for his attacks on the Conservative leader Lord Salisbury, and in the 1885 general election he proposed the "Unauthorised Programme" of benefits for newly enfranchised agricultural labourers. Chamberlain resigned from Gladstone's Third Government in 1886 in opposition to Irish Home Rule, and after the Liberal Party split he became a Liberal Unionist, a party which included a bloc of MPs based in and around Birmingham.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Winston Churchill is remembered as one of Britain’s most influential people. He played a crucial role in British history, leading them through both World Wars and coming out victorious in both. One of his strong suits was his ability to rally Britain behind him. He used his gift of public speaking to get people to listen to his ideas and support his administration. Churchill was able to do this so effectively by using longstanding Victorian values in his speeches that civilians could identify with.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays