Roselyn C. Oppus
Prof. Pedrito Castillo/GED 223
As many years have past, education is the life line bases form of school based in the basic qualification in a teacher education. In preparing such profession to become an educator it must have many trainings that you must have to meet. And also you must have to try many experiences before you go through to that certain profession. That’s why you must have a prior pedagogical theory to have in pursuing it. ( Howey,1974 and Friesen, 1993) In many different perspectives of students as a teacher you must in part your students through the process for them to process and engage them in many practices , so that they must improve their capacity in learning. Through that they can enhance the instructions to the improvement that they deal of.( Farrell, 1993) 1. Reflective practice, between such routine the students can easily distinguished their routines and also they can easily follow instruction through what teachers says, However, in doing such routines they can reflect their actions for them to enhance and supposed a prior knowledge through the practices that they have. In many practices that the teacher re-inculcate in their classes it can directly perceive by the students, as a result of that, students must have a prior knowledge to do so the learning and routines that they must have to possess, through this instructions and practices , the teacher can perceive what could be happened through his/her practices that she/he evaluated to his/her students actions while commemorating that practices.( Farrell , 2008) 2. Richness of a practical theory must have to students and teachers. But it accommodated that the teacher must have a full knowledge respectively. Though many categories, the teacher must expert to what he/she must trying to syas. And she/he knows how to explode the part that she/he trying to convey to his/her students. ( Berliner, 1995). As a teachers you must have a full view through the things that they are impart. They must have a states of ideas through their students that they must have the essense of knowing and understanding. (Berneth,1991). Teachers has more competence and have more prior knowledge to the certain agenda’s , so that student’s must full developed through their minds of what they must also do to make their part. ( Carter, 1990) 3. Instructional Perspdctives to all aspects to become a successful educators, you must have all the perspectives and qualification for that possession. In many instructions you must featured and focused to the method of instructions that you are in. it must be reliable while you are perserving that such instructions for your students for them to understands and they can easily determined that they particulate such instructions that they must also to possess throught the method of learning. And also they can gradually planned to what instructions must be prior and involve to the instructions. Aspects of learning that they are vigor to do so, so that their responsibility is to contextualize the learning that they must into. ( Boekaerts and Simons , 1986) (Charles). 4. Teacher knowledge being an educator you must have to commemmorate the thing that prior to the practical knowledge that you will have . you must conceptualize the different ideas and aspects that you must practice at the same time through certain experiences. Because being knowledgeable teachers, the students can interpret , you will know the things you might say while you are discussing to formal to informl affirmation of teaching. ( Fenstermacher, 1994;Shulman,1987). Among the afformentioned, in the terms that your students will conceptualized and have a strong perceptions in you as their intelligent teacher, that’s why you must present to your students the showcase of a teacher that they want to be, though the accordance that they are probably learning. ( Pratt,1992). 5....
References: * Farrell TSC (2008) Reflective Language Teaching: From Research to Practice. London: Continuum Press.
* Richards JC, Lockhart C (1994) Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
* Richards JC, Farrell TSC (2005) Professional Development for Language Teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
* Pratt, D. D. 1992. Conceptions of teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 42 (4), 203-220.
* Shulman, L. S. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: foundations of a new reform. Harvard Educational
Review 57, 1-22.
* Zeichner, K. 1996. Designing educative practicum experiences for prospective teachers. In Currents of reform in preservice teacher education. ed. K. Zeichner, S. Melnick & M. Gomez, 215-234. N.Y: Teachers College Press.
* Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach.
* Buitink, J. (1994). Achtergronden en mogelijkheden van een in-service opleiding.[Backgrounds and possibilities of an in-service programme]. VELON, Tijdschrift voor lerarenopleiders, 15(2), 4–11.
* Buitink, J. (1998). In-functie opleiden en in-functie leren van aan staande leraren. [In-function education and in-function learning of student teachers]. Doctoraldissertation. Groningen: UCLO.
* Carter, K. (1990). Teachers’ knowledge and learning to teach. InW. R. Houston (Ed.),Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 291–310). New York: MacMillan.
* Berliner, D. C. (1995). The nature of expertise in teaching. In F. K. Oser, A. Dick, & J. L. Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching: The new synthesis (pp. 227–248). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
* Bennett, C. (1991). The teacher as decision maker program: an alternative forcareer-change preservice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 119–130.
* Farrell, T. S. C. (2004). Reflective practice in action: 80 reflection breaks for busy teachers. California: CorwinPress.
* Richards, J. C. & Farrell, T, S. C. (2005). Professionaldevelopment for language teachers. New York:Cambridge University Press.
* Richards, J. C. & Lockhart, C. (1993). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
* Malderez, A. (2003). Observation. ELT Journal, 57(2), 179-181.
* Zeichner, K. M. (1983). Alternative paradigms ofteacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3),3–9.
* Thompson, A. G. 1992. Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. InHandbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, ed. D. Grouws. NewYork: Macmillan.
* Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
* Goodwin, A
* Bangert, A.W., & Kelting-Gibson, L. (2006). Teaching principles of assessment literacy throughteacher work sample methodology. Teacher Education and Practice, 19(3), 351–364.
* Salzman, S. (n.d.). By teaching we learn: Teacher education assessment. Retrieved June 12, 2004, from http://fp.uni.edu/itq/Powerpoint/index.htm.
* Schalock, M.D. (1998). Accountability, student learning, and the preparation and licensure of teachers:Oregon’s teacher work sample methodology. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education
Please join StudyMode to read the full document