Preview

Aritotle's Voluntary and Involuntary Actions

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
699 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aritotle's Voluntary and Involuntary Actions
Aristotle's "Nicomachean Ethics" generally focuses on living a virtuous life and having virtuous characteristics. In Book III Chapter II of "Nicomachean Ethics", Aristotle focuses on different types of actions. He divides actions into three categories: voluntary, involuntary and nonvoluntary. Aristotle makes this distinction mainly because his evaluation of someone's actions depends primarily on whether their actions are voluntary, involuntary, or nonvoluntary. Aristotle describes voluntary actions as those actions driven by an individual's ambition, passions or desires. "It is only voluntary feelings and actions for which praise and blame are given" (Book.III Ch.I). Praise and blame presuppose that our actions are done voluntarily. The person carrying out the act or the "doer" must also be aware of the particular circumstances in which he or she acts. Some acts may seem to contain both voluntary and involuntary actions. One example is a tyrant forcing a man to commit a shameful act by threatening the man's family. If the man refuses to commit this shameful act his family is to be killed. If the man agrees to commit the shameful act, though the man acted under pressure, his actions are still voluntary because the man freely chose between two alternatives. The situation may not have been voluntary, but his response was voluntary. According to Aristotle, as long as the action is considered of and performed by the doer with no inescapable force, the action is voluntary. The fact that the man knew the circumstances surrounding his decision makes him fully responsible for his actions, therefore, making those actions voluntary. All decisions are voluntary actions. Aristotle describes involuntary actions as those actions where the principle of the actions lie outside of the doer. When someone does something wrong because of an external agent, they are exempt from blame and punishment. "those [actions] that are involuntary are condoned, and sometimes even pitied"


Bibliography: Irwin, Terence. Gail Fine. 1996. Aristotle Introductory Readings. Hackett publishing 1995. Indianapolis, Indiana

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to Aristotle, whether a virtuous or vicious person, people will make decisions in their lives and these decisions will be to act, either virtuously or viciously. These actions will fall into…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However Aristotle then explains that a person should not act virtuously just to achieve a particular end because he believes this to be a subordinate aim. A person that acts in a way to achieve goodness Aristotle explains is a superior aim and it is these people that act ‘’good’’ because it is the right way to act not because they ought to. Following on from this Aristotle goes on to explain the key to goodness and virtue is to follow the ‘’golden mean’’. This is when as a person we act between two extreme vices for example the midpoint between shamelessness and shyness is modesty, this therefore is the golden mean. Aristotle also distinguished between two types of virtue, moral virtues and intellectual virtues. The first being those cultivated through habit whilst intellectual virtues are those cultivated through instruction. In the later twentieth century Virtue Ethics suffered a revival. It was questioned whether Aristotle’s teachings on Virtue Ethics had any weaknesses and some modern perspectives on Virtue Theory can be seen to highlight these flaws.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism is defined as “the doctrine that all events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes external to the will. ”, there have been many cases where philosophers determine that determinism implies that beings that have no free will, cannot be held morally responsible for their actions. David Hume’s definition of necessity is similar to the definition of determinism because it shows that what is necessity is constant or always necessary, plainly put his definition states that necessity is the “constant conjunction of objects and the inference of the mind from one object to the other“ William James thought was that his will was free so he was considered a indeterminism. James believed that each being held moral responsibility…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autonomous choice - One which occurs when people act (1) intentionally, (2) with understanding, and (3) without controlling influences that determine their actions…

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phl458 Week 1

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    "Free will is the capacity to respond in ways that oppose even the strongest influences. Free will is itself a causative factor, and one that can trump all others" (Ruggiero, 2019, p. 37). We all have a choice in any situation, although one's ethics or morals can influence choices, nevertheless the choice to react in one way or another is one's free will.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle accepts the individual choices and experiences of people and was more concerned with virtue ethics. He doesn't have an idea of free will. Along with Socrates, Aristotle believes that someone may know what the best outcome is and still do wrong, but draws the line between happiness and moral virtue. This includes depression and unhappiness. The world has moral meaning. He explains that moral virtue does not mean the end of life. His theory is that happiness is the end of life, which comes together with reason. Virtue is a state of personality that has to do with someone’s choice.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr Guzha

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Voluntary nature of actus reus , The act or omission must be voluntary on the part of the defendant, if the defendant has no control over his actions the n he has not committed the actus reus. InHill v B…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the topic of action, granted both men support action instead of non-action, the intentions through which they encourage action however, oppose each other directly. Jesus argues for good action under the order of God and for the personal benefit of unlimited access to heaven. “For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes of Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 5.20). Aristotle, on the other hand, argues for action done well, repeatedly, and with the right intention, “We reach the conclusion that the good of man is an activity of the soul in conformity with excellence or virtue, and if there are several virtues, in conformity with the best and most complete” (Ethics 1098a.15). Their varying opinions on action does not define them alone, but their definitions of virtue as well. As stated above—Jesus views faith as the highest virtue, while Aristotle views contemplation as the most important. characteristic. Because of this extreme contrast between the two, we can definitively prove that Aristotle would not agree with Jesus’ conception of virtue or…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since the 1990’s, Major League Baseball has been tainted by the “steroid era,” with over 127 players admitting to or being charged for performance-enhancing drug usage. As records have been shattered, books have been published, and players have confessed to their exploits, these drugs have made society question the legitimacy of America’s favorite pastime. One of the game’s greatest, Hank Aaron, set the all time homerun record in 1974. Thirty-three years later, Barry Bonds tied this record, and shortly after was indicted for lying under oath about his alleged use of steroids in the BALCO scandal. An example of two monumental milestones, both affected by the use of illegal drugs, raises concerns about ethics and morality in the world of baseball. Though controversy often surrounds the world of athletics, no other topic threatens health, careers, and achievements more than steroid usage.…

    • 2376 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As explained in the previous texts Aristotle based his views off of how a person ought to live. There is a generic rule of what a human being should find virtuous but also people can have different beliefs on virtues specifically for them. Utilitarianism is act orientated rather than agent orientated. So in this view it describes actions that will get us what we want. Virtue ethics is agent orientated where actions are devised by what we desire while using reason. This reasoning is the action any “good” person would do. Utilitarianism believes in the same consequence for each situation. This outcome is happiness. Virtue ethics considers what the right course of action is in different situations. So what is noticed is utilitarianism depends…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's ethical theory is known as virtue ethics because at the centre of his description of the good, which are the virtues which shape human character and human behaviour. However, this good human life is one lived in harmony and cooperation with other people, since Aristotle saw people as not only rational beings but as also social beings too.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would lean more towards the compatibilist view stating, unless I am the cause of my actions I am not responsible for them. As compatibilist holds that free will and determinism are compatible, we can properly understand what it means for our actions to be free so we see that a free action is doing what one wants. Believing in compatibilism doesn't mean the determinist view is false, but if it is true, we can still have free will. I believe that we make decisions based on our own desires and beliefs. It is said that compatibilists attempt to revise and weaken the commonsense notion of free will. Thomas Hobbes was the first person to articulate a compatibilist position believing that although the person is free to act on their motive, the motive is determined. In other words, he says “Everything we choose to do is strictly determined by the need to relieve the physical pressures of our bodies. Humans…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Personal Responsibility

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this paper, the author defends a view according to which one is responsible for one 's actions to the extent that one has the ability to do the right thing for the right reasons.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism Vs Fatalism

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Agents have the capability to reflect on their situation, to form intentions about how they will act, and then to carry out that action. The notion of free will has become an important issue in the debate on whether individuals are ever morally responsible for their actions and, if so, in what sense. Incompatibilists regard determinism as at odds with free will, whereas compatibilists think the two can coexist.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Involuntary acts – where person cannot control their actions, this is an involuntary act…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays