Preview

Argumentative Essay On Safe Space

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
842 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay On Safe Space
The Safe Space Network defines a safe space as, “A place where the rules guard each person’s self-respect and dignity and strongly encourage everyone to respect others.” Many college campuses across the country has these “safe spaces”. In Brown University, their safe space includes cookies, coloring books, bubbles, a video of puppies, and other child-like related items meant to promote self expression, no matter how controversial the utilizer’s gender identity, religious beliefs, or culture. Contrary to their name, I believe safe spaces have the potential for extreme danger when students cannot express their ideas outside of those zones. Being told to keep ideas to one’s self restricts important qualities of human nature--self-expression and individuality. The fear of offending others, an increase in narcissistic value, and a …show more content…
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy argues, “Free speech becomes a volatile issue when it is highly valued because only then do the limitations placed upon it become controversial.” Although I agree that America values free speech, I believe that the American citizen values only their own free speech. Appreciating my own free speech but no one else’s begins the endless cycle of an easily offended nation. Today’s culture utilizes free speech to stop free speech. When one person believes in marriage meant for a male and female and another believes in marriage for any mix of genders, who calls who a hater? Well balanced tolerance solves the problem of offending others, but only through patience . Society continually presents itself with contradicting views, as a part of human nature. Attempting to protect people from each other's views only opens the door to an easily offended population. It becomes effortless in a society of instant gratification to let narcissism take over. Once America loses the tolerance facet of citizenship, it allows everyone to offend each

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The United States prides itself on the freedoms that are afforded to each of its citizens. Among those freedoms is the first amendment freedom of speech. However, that freedom is often called into question. For instance, the Snyder v. Phelps case. In the Snyder v. Phelps case, Albert Snyder who is the father of Matthew A. Snyder, argues how the Westboro Baptist Church (WBC) picketed his son’s funeral asserting offensive statements due to his Albert Snyder’s homosexuality. Moreover, Snyder filed a lawsuit against the WBC “for defamation, intrusion, upon seclusion, infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy” (“Snyder v. Phelps” Wikipedia). The speech discussed in the Snyder v. Phelps case deserves the protection of the first amendment.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Bill of Rights, Amendment I states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (Bill of Rights). These rights were basically protecting what people say, and write, however, we are slowly loosing those rights. We have to worry now about offending someone because of our language, or saying something that is considered politically incorrect. A quote that has made a big difference in my perception when dealing with people is “You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time”. (Lydgate) As I grow older, I see this to be so true. If you look around, you see people being offended more and more. When you please one group, then another group will be offended. There is no way to please everyone, even with claiming terms are politically correct/incorrect. We are in a vicious cycle of using a word in the proper context, it being misused, being changed to a politically correct word, then the word being misused again.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights. A careful reading of the First Amendment reveals that it protects several basic liberties freedom i.e. religion, speech, press, petition, and assembly. Interpretation of the amendment is far from easy, as court case after court case has tried to define the limits of these freedoms. The prohibition on abridgment of the freedom of speech is not absolute. Certain types of speech may be prohibited outright. Some types of speech may be more easily constrained than others. Furthermore, speech may be more easily regulated depending upon the location at which it takes place. All these rights protect the people of the US they have the right to religion and speech, they right to say whatever they want as long as it’s true without being held accountable for it. Even though speech is protected by the First Amendment not every speech is protected for example obscenity, child pornography, and speech that constitutes so-called “fighting words” or “true threats” are not protected by the amendment. There has always been controversy for defending the free speech rights of groups that spew hate, such as the Ku Klux Klan and the Nazis. But if only popular ideas were protected, we wouldn't need a First Amendment. If we do not come to the defense of the free speech rights of the most unpopular among us, even if their views are antithetical to the very freedom the First Amendment stands for, then no one's liberty will be secure. I can’t say I disagree with anything about these facts, I do agree that one should have freedom of speech everyone should feel free to express themselves by speaking but not everything should be said and that is why not every speech is protected by the amendment.…

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, the first amendment is taken advantage of in many ways. Many people express that they can say whatever they please because they have the Freedom of Speech. They might burn the USA flag, make a racist remark, or some other kind of action, but what they do not realize is that this may hurt people. The First Amendment should be limited so that individuals can speak their mind so long as it does not hurt other people, or violates their rights.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article was written about the topic of political correctness in American society. This is a very relevant subject in today’s political issues. Not until recently, has America seen such a push towards this idea of political correctness, to avoid saying certain statements, facts, or truths, just because it may “offend” an opposing viewpoint. The author believes that political correctness is extremely detrimental to American…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why I Use Trigger Warnings

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A common debate in many American Universities has emerged regarding the necessity for trigger warnings in class syllabi as an attempt to warn every student of offensive and triggering material that they may not want to discuss. Although it may seem important to give notice to students of scandalous or offensive material, the addition of trigger warnings in syllabi is excessive and will only leave students unable to develop intellectually. This form of censorship only coddles the students, keeping them from learning that there will always be upsetting topics that they cannot control. By censoring college curriculum, we are allowing students to rely on trigger warnings to be there during every uncomfortable situation they may face. Students must be able to see those topics at an intellectual level in order to move past them, instead of wanting to be shielded from any controversial ideas. Just as Jonathan Haidt argues in The Coddling of the American Mind, campuses have become safe places "where young adults are shielded from words and ideas that make them…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment grants Americans the ability to express "unpopular views" in all forms of communication such as newspapers, television, radio, and even in the classroom. I believe the U.S. is based on all types of religions, beliefs, and values. Since our country is so diverse, it is hard…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jonathan Swift Satire

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A wise man once said, “I see offense of the collateral damage of free speech. I hate the thought of a person’s ideas being modified or even hushed because someone somewhere might not like to hear them…”(Ricky Gervais, 2013) This generation faces many social issues, but the main on that offends many people is Freedom of Speech about Christianity. In today’s society it is okay for someone to have their own opinion as long as they don’t say something about Christianity that may cause another person to feel or be offended. Today’s generation has become so overly offended by Christianity that the truth has become based upon what is socially acceptable to say. People who speak the truth are being muzzled and even killed because they said something that caused another person to be offended. Our generation is no longer willing to stand up for what they believe is right and wrong for a social change to happen.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within a society, there is always disagreement. There is disagreement on who should be in charge, on what ideals should be fought for, and on what laws are just. In America, we are blessed with the freedom to speak our mind. The very first amendment made to the Constitution says "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assembly..." (1). While there is no doubt that the freedom of speech, press, and peaceful assembly is always to be guaranteed to us, there are those who believe that the latter freedom can negatively impact a free society.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    free speech does not and cannot reside in some Platonic ideal. Rather it can only be…

    • 611 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Text 1 Catrin Nye defines what the term safe space implies, “A safe space is an accessible environment in which every student feels comfortable, and can get involved free from intimidation or judgment.” (Text 1 ll. 21-25) If this definition is believed to be correct, then a university safe space must be somehow similar, perhaps consisting of being able to easily find an environment in which one feels relaxed and comfortable. This could be among a group of friends, or a certain gathering consisting of people with shared values, which also means that some ideas and thoughts might not be welcome. Having such safe spaces will result a mixed set of consequences. On the one hand, it obviously gives the students the possibility to have fun while…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    College Censorship Rules

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Crippling the delivery of unpopular views is a terrible lesson to send to impressionable minds and future leaders” (Rampell 1). This quote taken from Catherine Rampell in her article “Free speech is flunking out on college campuses” explains that strict censorship rules hurt students whose minds are still developing. Rules on censorship in a college setting are supposed to protect the rights of students. Censorship is supposed to protect them from extremely hate filled speeches, newspaper articles, and other documents. For example, defamation, lies, and uses of extremely hateful name calling such as the word “nigger,” are all applicable to fair censorship rules. Today, the power of censorship has grown strong. In a scramble to not offend anyone,…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Naturally, many negative connotations come along with the term “free-speech zone.” The wording alone automatically insinuates that free speech should not be allowed everywhere, which is hardly the true intention of the idea. Sometimes the right of free speech is taken advantage of; such as in certain rallies and protests, where disruptive noise, violence, and destruction often occurs. Universities hold a responsibility to their students of providing a reasonably safe and undisruptive environment to learn and excel in. Universities are not creating “free-speech zones” to limit free speech, but rather to maintain a secure atmosphere that is conducive to concentration and higher learning.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However we aren’t the only country to have freedom; the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia are just some of the many other nations that also enjoy freedom. But the real question is, where do these rights end for an American? An American has their own voice, but the freedom of speech leads to the creation of stereotypes along with discrimination. This is where the concept of an American becoming a hypocrite kicks in. The idea of equality can never be made a reality with individuals treating each other the way they do now. The division among social groups whether it’s by race, religion, gender, economic status, or physical appearance, is unacceptable and the stereotypes only causes tension and for these groups to become more divided and separated from society as a whole. How can the United States boast its diversity, when the diversity of its people calls for tension and lead to a fragmented nation, and contradicts the name of the country itself? When will the American people become united once again just as they did during the Revolutionary…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree that the Rights of Man addressed specific grievances rather than vaguely outlining the rights of all humans. In the Articles, currently hostile conflicts were mentioned and resolved as well as issues of class and supplemented ideologies that the people of France knew and accepted.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays