Preview

Argument Against Euthanasia

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1545 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argument Against Euthanasia
The study of Bioethics involves the consideration of ethical issues arising from advancements in medicine and/or biology. The study of bioethics helps with determining the proper decision in regard to medical or biological issues. Bioethics is highly influential in academia, where scholars investigate the various scenarios arising from advancements, but is also influential in the applied realms of biology and medicine. Albert Jonsen, in his book Bioethics, claims "This field has established itself as an integral part of practical or applied philosophy and as a valuable adjunct to health policy and medical practice" (Jonsen 4). When dealing with the human body, ethics must be considered in order to preserve the value of human life. A highly …show more content…
Definitions of euthanasia abound in the medical community. John Keown in his book Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy: An Argument Against Legalisation, creates a succinct definition of euthanasia based on various understandings of the process, "Euthanasia involves doctors making decisions which have the effect of shortening a patient's life and these decisions are based on the belief that the patient would be better off dead" (Keown 10). One often sees manifestations of euthanasia on the death beds of those close to death. Doctors, loved ones, or the patient himself decides that it is better to be dead than alive. However, a major distinction must be made between active and passive euthanasia. Passive euthanasia occurs when physicians refrain from keeping a patient alive with life-sustaining technology or medicine (Medical News Today). This is the "pulling the plug" example, commonly referenced today. Passive euthanasia is typically less controversial than active euthanasia, being that instead of taking a direct action to end one's life, a physician chooses not to perform a particular …show more content…
Whether financially or emotionally, prolonged dying can prove incredibly detrimental to all of those involved. In a study conducted in 2000, 89% of patients said not being a burden to family was a very important consideration (Chantagul, Ho, 254). Typically very costly, medical treatment can financially cripple a family. A patient might rationalize euthanization but saying his death serves a greater good for his loved ones. A patient nearing death might also think it is better for him to die than have his family be so emotionally taxed by procedures prolonging the dying process. Euthanasia can offer a relief to a patient worried about causing his loved ones to suffer, giving the patient more peace in death. However, opponents of euthanasia use familial suffering as a reason why euthanasia should not be legalized (Barone). One might argue that patients can be pressured into taking their lives. Certainly, one is the master of his own life and should make decisions accordingly. Arguably one should never feel pressured to take his own life on the basis of another's well
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Moral Arguments Against Euthanasia
    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Moral Arguments Against Euthanasia

    The moral argument for euthanasia is most often the argument that voluntary active euthanasia should be legal. In a case when a patient has no possible road to recovery from their terminal illness, is suffering from their condition, and is still mentally capable of making justified decisions, the request to terminate their life should not be denied. Euthanasia is also a way to remove suffering in both voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia. In the case of non-voluntary euthanasia, it would be sparing their suffering in the outcome that they do regain a conscious state, but with a low quality of life. In the case of a family member going through this situation, most people would want to see their relative free of pain, even if it means the end of their life. The cost of healthcare can also greatly impact cases, proving a beneficial reason for the use of euthanasia. Many physicians due to their obligations in the medical field will keep a patient alive as long as possible, causing the cost of being terminally ill to skyrocket. The legalization of assisted suicide/euthanasia could prevent the financial problems that come with being terminally ill. Those that are terminally ill more than likely need to take a leave from work severely cutting their income, while having their expenses rise at a rapid rate to due variations of medical treatment. Figure 2 shows a chart of how terminally ill patients effect their family…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    End of Life Medical Issues
    • 844 Words
    • 3 Pages

    End of Life Medical Issues

    June 6, 2014 End of life medical issues are a very sensitive subject for doctors, patients, and family members. Some support the patients’ right to terminate their own life. Euthanasia loosely called physician assisted suicide is when one takes deliberate action to end life when faced with persistent suffering and certain death (Medical News Today, 2012).Many feel that patients should not have to suffer unjustly when faced with serious pain and debilitating illness. Often times it is just as difficult for family members to stand by and watch loved ones suffer. As someone that has witnessed both my grandmothers die on hospice care in the last six months, I know that watching someone die can be more painful than losing them all together. With as much compassion as I have for people in pain, I do not believe people have the right to end their lives whenever they chose. I oppose euthanasia and physician assisted suicide (PAS) because I believe that it is a doctor’s duty to keep patients alive, it may create financial and ethical issues when it comes to patients and insurance companies, and God should be the only one who decides when ones journey has been completed.…

    • 844 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Bioethics
    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Bioethics

    The thing with euthanasia is that it is a very sensitive subject that society tends to overlook. Euthanasia is defined as the practice of ending a life prematurely in order to end pain and suffering. It is also known as mercy killing. Usually the average person who undergoes euthanasia has an incurable condition. But there are other instances where some people want their life to be ended. In many cases, it is carried out at the person's request but there are times when they may be too ill and the decision is made by relatives, medics (“pulling the plug”) or, in some instances rarely, the courts.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Euthanasia
    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments Against Euthanasia

    Euthanasia the assisted killing of a terminal patient is a controversial topic that medical professionals cannot avoid. Many health professionals face the ethical dilemma of whether or not they should end a patient’s misery. Patient’s rights are always the top priority, doctors are taught to find every possible way to treat and cure the patient, but the possibility of the patient being irremediable to what extent is the health care professionals willing to go to give the patient their wishes?…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Nurture Makes Euthanasia More Acceptable
    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Nurture Makes Euthanasia More Acceptable

    Euthanasia is the practice of mercifully ending a person 's life in order to free someone from a deadly disease. The Greek word “Euthanasia” simply means “good death”. This refers to the intentional ending of a person or animal’s life to relieve suffering and pain. It is also known as “Mercy Killing”. It is a serious ethical and political issue in today’s society because it goes against the norms of traditional medicine. It is so, because some people define euthanasia as a form of suicide. However, some people actually think that it is a choice that concerns the quality of life. In fact, people have different standards regarding the worth of life. Others believe that being clinically alive is enough to say that a person should live, but for others, it is simply inadequate. If a person’s life is lacking in self awareness or intrinsic presence as a human being, due to extreme physical or mental suffering, then that person should be able to choose a dignified death rather than an undignified existence. This is evident because of moral conscience, social bias or pressure, and financial situations. It is portrayed that nurture or environmental factors plays a role that make euthanasia more appealing. In short, some people tend to disregard the moral and ethical values of life when they see a person suffering. Indeed, despite of the moral and ethical issues that contradict the concept of euthanasia, there are certain factors it impacts society positively, which leads it to be more socially acceptable.…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma
    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma

    I. INTRODUCTION: Euthanasia is a social issue in today’s world because not only does it affect the lives of those who are terminally ill and/or comatose, and the physicians who have been entrusted with their care, but it also affects the patient’s ability to have control over their own life, whether they are aware of this decision or not, which is one of the reasons why euthanasia has become such a controversial issue around the globe. Caddell and Newton (1995) define euthanasia as “any treatment initiated by a physician with the intent of hastening the death of another human being who is terminally ill and in severe pain or distress with the motive of relieving that person from great suffering” (p. 1,672). Even though the concept of great…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Is Euthanasia Ethically Wrong
    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Is Euthanasia Ethically Wrong

    It is nearly impossible for the patient to rely on another person to make the best decision that they would have made for themselves, particularly when it involves personal interests such as profiting from a will. If there is something to gain, the family members’ motives seem questionable. If the patient falls ill, then there lies a possibility that their heirs will hope for the patient’s death so that they could receive their inheritance. The inability to confirm whether the family actually has the patient’s best interest in mind supports the argument that any form of euthanasia is unethical. Moreover, some families may not have the opportunity to drop everything in order to take on the responsibility of their sick loved one. This causes added stress to the family and can lead to the desire to resolve the issue by forcing the idea of euthanasia on to the loved one. Also, health care costs for terminally ill patients, including nursing homes, prescription drugs, and home health care deserves consideration. According to Time.com, one in every four Medicare dollars spent goes to the five percent of beneficiaries in the last year of their life. The result of this is often overwhelming debt for the families of terminally ill patients, with the care of a single patient costing approximately $39,000 exceeding the financial assets for many households. When the patient is uninsured or denied coverage from an insurance company, the family inherits the costs. In cases like these, legalizing euthanasia would present it as a viable solution, and in their distress, the family members may selfishly consider it to alleviate the financial burden the patient may…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harwig's "Is There a Duty to Die"
    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Harwig's "Is There a Duty to Die"

    Hardwig begins his argument by explaining this “duty” began in more primitive cultures when voluntary euthanasia was common simply due to the fact the medical technology was limited and when individuals became too old and feeble they would generally be left alone to die so to limit the economic strain they would put on their society. He explains that this same duty has returned due to the fact that advances in life-prolonging medicine on a chronically ill individual can put significant economic strains on their family and loved ones. Overall, he stresses the importance that one should make on involving the family in making a decision on euthanasia (7-8) and significantly discredits the “Individualistic Fantasy” which is the belief that “lives are separate and unconnected, or that they could be so if we chose” (2).…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Assisted Suicide
    • 2527 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Assisted Suicide

    In George D.Pozgar’s book Legal and Ethical Issues for Health Professionals it defines euthanasia as “an act conducted for the purpose of causing the medical death of a person who is suffering from an incurable condition, such as providing a patient with medication to hasten his or her death” (2013, pg.535). The actual word euthanasia is a Greek word meaning a good death. There are two different types of euthanasia; passive and active. There are also two different categories; which are voluntary and involuntary. Passive euthanasia is usually consider more ethically and morally acceptable by many because it is…

    • 2527 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    My Objection to James Rachels’s Argument
    • 1302 Words
    • 4 Pages

    My Objection to James Rachels’s Argument

    Even those who agree with legalization of euthanasia are divided over another issue: whether or not to permit active euthanasia. According to a former philosophy professor at Duke University James Rachels, active euthanasia is “to take any direct action designed to kill the patient,” where as passive euthanasia is “to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die.”1 He deems active and passive euthanasia in simpler notions, “killing” and “letting die.”…

    • 1302 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Arguments Against Active Euthanasia
    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Arguments Against Active Euthanasia

    “Any action or social policy is morally right if it serves to increase the amount of happiness in the word or to decrease the amount of misery. Conversely, an action or social policy is morally wrong if it serves to decrease happiness or to increase misery.” (RSL/Rachels, EL 247) The utilitarian argument is used to justify and condemn many policies, however, I believe that the argument is especially fitting when it comes to the matter of active euthanasia. Mercy, an action that serves to decrease the overall misery in the world, is an unquestionable sign of kindness and correctness. Mercy comes in many forms and is rarely frowned upon. Following this reasoning, why is mercy that takes the form of ending a suffering patient’s life considered…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Active and Passive Euthanasia - Paper
    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Active and Passive Euthanasia - Paper

    Active and Passive Euthanasia Abstract The traditional distinction between active and passive euthanasia requires critical analysis. The conventional doctrine is that there is such an important moral difference between the two that, although the latter is sometimes permissible, the former is always forbidden. This doctrine may be challenged for several reasons. First of all, active euthanasia is in many cases more humane than passive euthanasia. Secondly, the conventional doctrine leads to decisions concerning life and death on irrelevant grounds. Thirdly, the doctrine rests on a distinction between killing and letting die that itself has no moral importance. Fourthly, the most common arguments in favor of the doctrine are invalid. I therefore suggest that the American Medical Association policy statement that endorses this doctrine is unsound. (N Engl J Med 292:78-80, 1975) The distinction between active and passive euthanasia is thought to be crucial for medical ethics. The idea is that it is permissible, at least in some cases, to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die, but it is never permissible to take any direct action designed to kill the patient. This doctrine seems to be accepted by most doctors, and it is endorsed in a statement adopted by the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association on December 4, 1973: The intentional termination of the life of one human being by another -mercy killing is contrary to that for which the medical profession stands and is contrary to the policy of the American Medical Association. The cessation of the employment of extraordinary means to prolong the life of the body when there is irrefutable evidence that biological death is imminent is the decision of the patient and/or his immediate family. The advice and judgment of the physician should be freely available to the patient and/or his immediate family. However, a strong case can be made against this doctrine. In what follows I will set out some of…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Arguments Against Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Arguments Against Physician Assisted Suicide

    EUTHANASIA/PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE I. INTRODUCTION The argument that has sent the world into a tailspin is whether or not people suffering from terminal or excruciatingly painful illness have the right to take their own lives by way of physician-assisted suicide. Proponents contend that what one does with one 's life is of no consequence to anyone else -- that it is humane to allow someone to be relieved of constant – if not unbearable – discomfort. On the other hand, critics claim that the act of euthanasia is nothing more than a fabricated form of murder. Indeed, both sides have pertinent points when it comes to understanding and assessing the conflict, but euthanasia supporters have a significantly stronger argument when considering the bigger picture. Clearly, physician-assisted suicide is not only the right thing to do for someone seeking such a decision, but it is ethical and humane for a physician to abide by the patient 's wish.…

    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Dying with Dignity (Euthanasia)
    • 2463 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Dying with Dignity (Euthanasia)

    Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………9 References……………………………………………………………………………………...10 Introduction People have been suffering from terminal illnesses for centuries. Some physicians believed that these people should not have to suffer if that was their wishes. They had come up with the idea of euthanasia; euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of a person in a painless way. Some people think that euthanasia is a crime just like murder; some others think that euthanasia is necessary for those people who are in unbearable pain and have no cure.…

    • 2463 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Advantages And Disadvantages Of Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Advantages And Disadvantages Of Physician Assisted Suicide

    Physician-assisted suicide as an option for the terminally ill Physician-assisted suicide, often confused with euthanasia (differences to be addressed shortly) provides an incredible amount of relief to both patients and the families of those suffering from terminal illnesses, by allowing patients to choose to end their life with dignity, on their own terms. Without the option of physician-assisted suicide, terminal patients would succumb to their afflictions over time. This could potentially involve prolonged periods of pain, both physical and emotional. In the eyes of those who wish to practice assisted suicide, this is interpreted as unnecessary suffering. Those who oppose physician-assisted suicide often claim that their opposition…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics