Preview

Analysis Of Whom Shall I Blame: Min'ster Or Monster?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
87 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Whom Shall I Blame: Min'ster Or Monster?
Whom shall I blame

Min’ster or monster?

My son died in deadly disaster.

He was my love

A snow-white dove

Now lay buried in debris below.

The jealousy that rose

To the height of twin tower

One day had to come lower.

But not so swift

Like heart arrest

In seconds was all put to rest

In peace forever.

In grief I groan

For my son I mourn

I wish a pen with my tears

For peace were mightier

Than min’ster’ nuclear bomb

Or monster’s human
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Who Is The Monster's Fault In Frankenstein
    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Who Is The Monster's Fault In Frankenstein

    “To be friendless is indeed to be unfortunate; but the hearts of men, when unprejudiced by any obvious self-interest, are full of brotherly love and charity” (95). Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is the story of a man who creates a creature, and through neglect, prejudice, and self-interest creates a monster. Mary Shelley was born to Mary Wollstonecraft a feminist writer. Although Shelly’s mother died from complications during Mary Shelley’s birth, many of Wollstonecraft’s ideas can be seen in Frankenstein. Her ideas are especially present when discussing whether it is the monster’s fault he is a monster or whether it is the fault of the prejudicial society he was forced into by his creator.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jonathan Safran Foer's Extremely Loud And Incredibly Close
    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jonathan Safran Foer's Extremely Loud And Incredibly Close

    The exploration of what it means to be human is heavily focused on in Jonathan Safran Foer’s Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close. The story follows a nine-year-old boy whose father died in the 9/11 attacks as he struggles to find some reason behind it, wondering along the way about existence and, more importantly, human emotion. All humans experience a range of emotions, from happiness to anger and everything in between. One of the most prominent human experiences is loss and the grief that follows it. The grieving process presents itself in many ways, and it is different for everyone. Through examining the text via formalism, which focuses solely on the text itself and not on the author on any other element, it becomes clear that the varying ways of mourning and receiving closure are well represented. The setting, plot, and structure used in the text all tie together the examination of grief as part of what it means to be human—everyone deals with grief, but each person must find a way to do so.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Cause And Effect Essay
    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    9/11 Cause And Effect Essay

    On September 11, 2001, It was just an ordinary day for everyone living in New York City and Washington D.C, doing their usual routine, but those were about to change in a single beat. Two big towers were completely destroyed, 4 huge commercial airplanes were crashed, one hit the field of Pennsylvania, and the pentagon were almost demolished in a flashed of an eye, a horrible experienced that caused a dramatic reaction not only to the people who saw it but to the people who were in contact of 9/11. After all the attacked, this is something that the Americans will never forget. “This wasn't al Qaeda's first terrorist attack, but it was the deadliest”.(Ojalvo,1)…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Nature V.S. Nurture, Who’s to Blame for Acts of Violence?
    • 1137 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nature V.S. Nurture, Who’s to Blame for Acts of Violence?

    Since the beginning of the Neolithic Revolution violence has been used as a means to obtain land and resources; as well as to exert dominance and control over others. Some would say that violence is a part of human nature, that it’s imbedded in our DNA; while others would say that human beings aren’t inherently violent; that our environment and our culture shapes us into who we become as adults. That debate poses this question: When a crime is committed who bares the responsibility? Is it the perpetrators who committed the offense or the environment that shaped them into being? While Aaron McKinney and Russell Henderson were physically responsible for the death of Matthew Shepard, the town of Laramie, and the U.S. by extension, was also to blame because of the subtle heteronormativity ingrained in American culture.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Is The Real Monster-Victor Or The Creature?
    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Who Is The Real Monster-Victor Or The Creature?

    From the day the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley had been published, there has been constant debate over who is the real monster; was it the god-like mentality of Victor Frankenstein, or the creature himself for being something unnatural?…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Scapegoat In Frankenstein
    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Examples Of Scapegoat In Frankenstein

    The placement of blame on one person can often be hard to determine; in many situations, blame can truly be shared amongst two or more people, however one person is used as a scapegoat in order to keep the other away from trouble or punishment. In the fiction novel Frankenstein, by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, the blame of the tragic deaths and other events that took place was completely placed on Victor’s shoulders. However, this is because the monster uses Victor as a scapegoat and constantly refers to his abandonment and lack of knowledge as excuses as to why he committed these crimes. The blame between Victor and the monster should be shared.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How does Frankenstein's retrospective narrative of chapters 1-5 attempt to situate blame for his actions elsewhere, and how far are we convinced by his "excuses"?(Frankenstein, Mary Shelley)
    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How does Frankenstein's retrospective narrative of chapters 1-5 attempt to situate blame for his actions elsewhere, and how far are we convinced by his "excuses"?(Frankenstein, Mary Shelley)

    Shelley chose to allow Frankenstein to narrate his own tale for several reasons. For example, a direct effect of this first person narrative is that it lets the reader into the inner thoughts of the main protagonist. This allows us to pass judgement on the choices he makes, the explanations he gives for them and the general way in which he considers his actions and comes to justify them. However, in fitting with the gothic genre of the novel, the decision on whether or not to sympathise with Frankenstein can not be made easily, putting the reader into an uncomfortable, uncertain state of mind. The clever narrative Shelley uses often creates such a feeling of ambiguity, which enhances the horror we come to feel as the book progresses. Whilst the fact that Shelley presents Frankenstein's view first suggests she doesn't want us to totally condemn him, there is also an ironic repulsion we sometimes feel towards him because of the views that he expresses so confidently, despite his attempts to gain sympathy. In this respect, Frankenstein's narration is often more telling of himself than he actually realises.…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Who Is To Blame In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Who Is To Blame In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, travels along with the two main characters, Victor and his abomination of a creation, through their trials and tribulations against each other . The controversy of who is to blame for the tragedies that take place, has been an ongoing debate for centuries since the publication of the book itself. The author of a “WriteWork” article states, “...the events that occurred are that repercussions of one man's irresponsible and reckless behavior” (WriteWork). This author has taken the side of the monster and throws the blame and ridicule towards Victor Frankenstein, the mad scientist. However, another article by “The Art of Manliness” gives their opinion of Victor, “...as an intelligent and physically astute being” (The…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Whom Do You Sympathise with More - Frankenstein or the Creature?
    • 2751 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Whom Do You Sympathise with More - Frankenstein or the Creature?

    As a cautionary tale warning of the dangers that can be cast into society by a presuming experimental science, Frankenstein is without equal 1. Written in 1818 with the three volumes compiled into one in 1831, Mary Shelley sets out in her story to “speak to the mysterious fears of our nature and awaken thrilling horror”. Throughout the novel, the underlying themes of the ambitions of man, the importance of appearances and the battle between science and religion are woven seamlessly together into a timeless, mind-provoking classic.…

    • 2751 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The True Monster (Comparison between Victor Frankenstein and the Monster)
    • 1305 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The True Monster (Comparison between Victor Frankenstein and the Monster)

    In Mary Shelley 's gothic novel, Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein creates and animates a monster from various corpses. Victor 's experiment works, yet when the creature he creates comes to life, he is hideous. He immediately flees from Frankenstein 's laboratory and kills Frankenstein 's brother. Later, feeling ultimate loneliness, the creature begs Frankenstein to build a companion for him, but he refuses to complete the task. In revenge, the creature murders Frankenstein 's wife and best friend (Hawkins). Frankenstein is a story that focuses on the outcome of Victors endeavor to interfere with nature. In the novel, Victor 's creation is not born evil; rather it is the result of poor parenting that he becomes evil and vengeful. Throughout the novel, Shelley creates a definite perception of the creature and his creator by using various writing techniques. Shelley makes readers sympathetic towards the creature by offering hints in her work as to the creature 's true sentiments. She also uses writing techniques to create the perception that the true monster is Victor, not the creature that he created. Shelley offers insight into a series of character 's qualities and actions and this offers readers a greater view into their knowledge and their personalities. By using these effective writing techniques, Mary Shelley is able to create the perception that the real monster is Victor and not the monster himself.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Responsibility Of The Monster In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Responsibility Of The Monster In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    Victor Frankenstein a man who thinks so highly of himself, yet uses his knowledge to bring back a monster formed from the bodies of the desists. Bring together the bodies of the dead and putting them together is unethical and immoral. Bringing back a man of many body’s which he does not care for is the worst part. To bring someone back to life and put them through what Frankenstein did is the worst thing that you could do to anyone.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Frankenstein: Monsters and Their Superiority
    • 2222 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Frankenstein: Monsters and Their Superiority

    <br>This reflects how both Grendel and Frankenstein must have felt during their lonely lives. The monsters simply wanted to live as the rest of society does. However, in our prejudice of their kind, we banish them from our elite society. Who gave society the right to judge who is acceptable and who is not? A better question would be who is going to stop society from judging? The answer is no one. Therefor, society continues to alienate the undesirables of our community. Some of the greatest minds of all time have been socially unacceptable. Albert Einstein lived alone and rarely wore socks of the same colour. Van Gogh found comfort only in his art and the women who constantly denied his passion. Edgar Allen Poe was "different" to say the least, consumed by the morose. Just like these great men, Grendel and Frankenstein's monster do not conform to the societal model. Also like these men, Grendel and the monster are uniquely superior to the rest of mankind. Their superiority is seen through their guile to live in a society that ostrasises their kind.…

    • 2222 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein: Who is the Real Monster
    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Frankenstein: Who is the Real Monster

    In the popular novel Frankenstein, which was written by Mary Shelley, there a few characters that play the role of a monster and have illogical ways of thinking. Society itself shows that it can be the monster throughout the story based on how it treats the creature. Also, the monster that is created obviously possesses traits of a monster because of the rejection that he has from society. Even though society and the monster can be brutal about particular situations, the person who is the real monster in Frankenstein, is Victor Frankenstein. As the creator of the monster, Victor proves to be the true monster many times throughout the novel.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Is To Blame For Frankenstein's Tragedy
    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Who Is To Blame For Frankenstein's Tragedy

    Frankenstein, a play that has been around for one-hundred years still is remembered till this day. There was a monster that had one request and a creator who ignored it; all lead to a depressing tragedy. Dr. Frankenstein is to blame for the tragedies that occurred to the monster because he did not account for the consequences that occurred. The doctor abandoned the monster when he could not control him any longer and did not take ownership for his creation which makes him solely responsible for the death and destruction in this story.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of Billy The Green Monster
    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of Billy The Green Monster

    The Mascot Hall Of Fame™ consists of mascots that are fan favorites in multiple sports. Wally the Green Monster is the official mascot of the Boston Red Sox and was debuted in 1997. He is named after the most iconic wall in sports at Fenway Park. Wally has been a mascot for over 20 years and has been featured in many major publications such as Sportscenter, ESPN, and is even featured in MLB the Show 17. Wally the Green Monster should be nominated for the Mascot Hall of Fame. Some may argue that there are better candidates, but he is an excellent and deserving nominee because he is youth focused, gives memorable performances, impacts their sport, have a memorable or unique design, and impact their community.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics