Preview

An ideal world and death penalty

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
367 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An ideal world and death penalty
An Ideal World, An Ideal Tomorrow.. My vision

In my ideal world I see the world completely differently as what it is. As we take pride in the knowledge society and claim to have controlled the world at our command, thanks to the Internet, we see at the end of the spectrum, the piteous spectacle of thousands of poor weak and downtrodden. The cause is poverty which is destructive for the growth of any country. In my vision for an ideal world, Women will have a great role to play in the progress of our country for the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. Communal harmony has always been and will always be the Backbone of any country’s Harmony. The youth of any country should be carefully shaped as the youth can make or mar the country, their creative potential is as immense as their destructive potential. This ideal world will be free of terrorism and fear. Right to education, health and freedom will be given to all. Greenery will be kept intact. Some say an ideal world is a myth but great visions of great personalities will help convert this myth into truth and that is possible only due to mass awareness.

Does a government have the right to put people to death?
There are many compelling reasons to answer no
First of all, the death penalty diminishes the humanity of everyone it touches.. since our system of justice can never be mistake-free, it is inevitable that an error will be made in a capital case and an innocent person will be executed. Everyone thinks human life is valuable. Some of those against capital punishment believe that human life is so valuable that even the worst murderers should not be deprived of the value of their lives.
They believe that the value of the offender's life cannot be destroyed by the offender's bad conduct - even if they have killed someone.
Some abolitionists don't go that far. They say that life should be preserved unless there is a very good reason not to, and that the those who are in favour of capital

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Definitions For Ethics GCSE

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Some suggest that Capital Punishment is not the way to go as sooner or later people will get killed because of mistakes or flaws in the justice system, for example witnesses, prosecutors and jurors them being human can all make mistakes (Alexander Pope) “To err is human”. When these human mistakes are coupled with flaws in the system it is inevitable that innocent people will be convicted of crimes. Where capital punishment is used mistakes cannot be put right.…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Such mistakes that have been made must be prevented for the future, so that the innocent don 't continue to suffer. In fact, the Innocence Project, an organization that emphasizes the faults in our death penalty system, states that the inmates falsely accused of their crimes "...were convicted in 11 states and served a combined 209 years in prison – including 187 years on death row – for crimes they didn’t commit." (Innocence Project). To be exonerated after years and years must leave unfathomable mental trauma. If that many innocent people have been forced to wait on the edge of death for this long, it wouldn 't be hard to believe that some won 't be lucky enough to be saved from the mistakes of our unacceptably inefficient court system. Killing a person, even sentencing them to death, is only just if they truly deserve it. That is what Dexter argues, yet our country continues to ineffectively implicate capital punishment by making the innocent suffer through unnecessary torture. We must end capital punishment, or at least make it more efficient. There are lives at…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate on the pros and cons of the death penalty has gone on for decades. There are some people who oppose the death penalty because they fell it is a system that is so flawed that it serves no purpose. For instance, those against the death penalty believe that this sentence has the potential for an error because it is possible that the wrong person can be executed. Unfortunately, there is no way for those who decide who is guilty to always be 100 percent accurate.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No matter what is the crime people commit they are still people. As people die over the world the world cannot pause and grieve forever. Capital punishment is over looked by the general public because they assume that if you are facing capital punishment you are a horrible criminal. But when you look in a humanitarian sense the criminal is just like any other person. No mistake is too horrible that it justifies taking another human…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human rights have existed for thousands of years. Ever since there were people, there were some form of human rights observed by the masses. Although human rights can vary based on tradition and culture and may be constantly changing according to the norm in society, there is now a universal understanding of what human rights are and how they should be observed. One of the many topics relating to human rights that has been of great controversy throughout all of history is capital punishment, or the death penalty. While it was used by all nations in the past and was once a norm in society, civilizations have grown to disagree with the taking of another person's life under any circumstance.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every convicted felon waiting on death row costs the American people over nine million dollars yearly to imprison. Such an absurd amount of money should be spent on the rehabilitation of these troubled individuals rather than in prolonging their lives only for their own demise. Before reverting to the early philosophy of Hammurabi “an eye for an eye” America should look to its own foundation, the constitution, as well as compare the costs and benefits of such a policy being legal. Despite enormous protections offered by the federal and states constitutions throughout the United States, many people have been executed in spite of evidence of their innocence. When capital punishment is concerned, most Americans believe our criminal system is close to infallible. Many assume that if factual errors do occur at trial, they will be discovered and corrected by higher courts. People believe that the innocent are rarely wrongly convicted and they are certainly not executed. Unfortunately, there is a large numbers of innocents people who…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For instance, it is unfair to the criminals in which the evidence against them is weak and in which it was an accident. Executing a person who could possibly be innocent is morally wrong and inhumane. I believe that for the criminals to die in such a public and painful way is cruel and unusual. It is not an effective way of handing out justice. The death penalty can also keep the victim’s families stuck in an angry stage of grief. Moreover, the death penalty might bring the opposite of what survivors of crime most need; accountability, healing and closure. Those criminals have family and loved ones too. Some of them even have a wife and children, why should they suffer by seeing or knowing that their loved one is being sentenced to death?…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mistakes will be made in any system which relies upon human testimony for proof. We should be vigilant to uncover and avoid such mistakes. Our system of justice rightfully demands a higher standard for death penalty cases. However, the risk of making a mistake with the extraordinary due process applied in death penalty cases is very small, and there is no credible evidence to show that any innocent persons have been executed at least since the death penalty was reactivated in 1976... The inevitability of a mistake should not serve as grounds to eliminate the death penalty any more than the risk of having a fatal wreck should make automobiles illegal..."…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Does killing ever justify murder? Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the act of killing criminals for heinous acts that they’ve committed, generally homicide. I believe that capital punishment is a social injustice because it is unconstitutional and unethical. Those against capital punishment question the surety of the offender’s guilt, economic costs, and the supposedly unbiased judges. There are two sides to every coin though, and there are many reasons to support capital punishment as well. Those who agree with capital punishment argue that it dissuades others from attempting similar crimes and is a fair retribution for lives lost. Of all the varied topics included when discussing capital punishment, one of the most frightening to think about is the possibility that the wrong man may have died.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always the problem of someone being wrongly convicted. “At least 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death in the US in the modern era are innocent, according to the first major study to attempt to calculate how often states get it wrong in their wielding of the ultimate punishment”(Pilkington). Even though the number of innocently convicted people is not that high once an innocent man or woman has been executed there is no way to undo what has been done. The criminal justice system is not perfect and they too sometimes make mistakes. “Whether our criminal justice system has executed an innocent man should no longer be an open question. We don't know how often it happens, but we know it has happened. Cameron Todd Willingham's case proves that. As long as our system of justice makes mistakes -- including the ultimate mistake -- we cannot continue executing people” (Scheck). Sometimes people make mistakes but innocent people being convicted and executed for a crime they didn’t commit is a mistake that can be prevented by making sure the death penalty isn’t an option for punishment any more. Innocent people don’t have to worry about this anymore if the death penalty is no longer possible there are also other options of punishment besides…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gary Gilmore was executed on January 17, 1977 for going on a killing spree. He was shot in an old wooden chair by prison guards behind the state prison in Utah. Gilmore was the first person ever to be executed in the United States (Bole, W., 2009). The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is when someone is put to death for committing a heinous crime such as rape or murder. Think about that for a moment. A person is killed for killing someone else. Is killing the murderer not just as bad as the murderer killing their victim? It is like mothers everywhere used to say, “Two wrongs do not make a right”. The death penalty is wrong because it costs taxpayers way too much money, they could have the wrong guy, there is a risk of it being botched, and it just prolongs the suffering of the prisoner 's family.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unjust Conviction

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Looking at the death penalty system in action, it is fundamentally flawed in use and there is a serious risk of executing innocent people. Many unjust convictions have shown that serious flaws such as: Lack of eyewitness identification, False confessions, and the access to have DNA testing have caused our countries criminal justice system to convict many innocent individuals, who were sentenced to death.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people are against the killing of others for any reasons. Other people feel that certain crimes should be punished by death. The death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of years, because people's life is at risk. The reviewing the numbers of facts prove that the death penalty should not be enforced. I think death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment. It should be abolished in this country it's racial discrimination, the financial cost and barbarity.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human life is a God-given right and a freedom provided by our government; however, mankind selfishly steals that right from their own all too often. The death penalty is a morally acceptable and justifiable punishment for murder. Simply placing someone in prison is not the equivalent to stealing an innocent life. According to Casey Carmical, “The purpose of the death penalty is to bring the murderer to justice and to acknowledge the sanctity and dignity of innocent human life” (Capital Punishment Is Morally Justified). Although abolitionists argue that the death penalty is too expensive and violates human rights, the death penalty does save lives, deter murder rates, and is a morally correct punishment.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Constitution, the Founding Fathers stated every person has inalienable rights. The Constitution grants humans the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The dictionary defines inalienable as “impossible to take away or give up.” Meaning, the government has no right to take those freedoms away from us. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Beyer believes the death penalty has many defects that make it unconstitutional. He believes, “The death penalty is unreliable, it is arbitrary and there are delays that undermine the purpose.” (Heyns). On another note, using the lethal injection can be very inhumane, which is why many believe capital punishment is unconstitutional. One author sheds light on how gruesome lethal injection can be, “In 2014 the lethal injection took 40 minutes to kill Oklahoma inmate Clayton Derrell.” (Heyns). Many countries have outlawed the use of capital…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays