Preview

Age Of Jackson Dbq Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1187 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Age Of Jackson Dbq Analysis
The Age of Jackson, from the 1820's to the 1830's, was a period of American history full of contradictions, especially in regard to democracy. The period saw an increase in voter participation, nominating committees replaced caucuses, and electors began to be popularly elected. Yet, all of these voting changes affected only a minority of the American people; White, Anglo-Saxon males. So, though one can easily tell that these males were gaining true liberty and equality, the millions of women, blacks, Native Americans, immigrants, and other minorities in America continued to languish in a society that limited their rights. During the Age of Jackson, a southern plantation owner himself, enslavement of Blacks was at a new high in America. At the …show more content…
What's more is that Jackson was not even completely true to his ideals. Jackson defied his democratic ideals so much that he gained the nickname King Andrew I from his political opponents. They called him hypocritical, and for good reason. In Daniel Webster's answer to Jackson's bank veto message (Doc. C), Webster claims that the message "raises a cry that liberty is in danger, at the very moment when it puts forth claims to powers heretofore unknown and unheard of.” However, it is very true that Jackson expanded his power radically while supposedly protecting democracy and equality. Jackson instated the spoils system to get his supporters into as many governmental positions as possible. He consistently used his unauthorized "Kitchen Cabinet" for advice instead of his real …show more content…
The plight of free Blacks and immigrants during the Age of Jackson is demonstrated by their tendency to riot. Commenting on the constant riots in the cities caused by prejudice and jealousy, Philip Hone wrote in his diary (Doc. E) that "dreadful riots between the Irish and the Americans have again disturbed the public peace." Some time later, in 1834, he wrote "The spirit of riot and insubordination... has made its appearance in... Philadelphia, and appears to have been produced by causes equally insignificant—hostility to the blacks and an indiscriminate persecution of all whose skins were darker than those of their enlightened fellow citizens." This document clearly points out the obvious lack of equality, liberty and democracy in Jacksonian America. Yet it doesn't even mention slavery. Jackson, a slaveholder himself, was no abolitionist. Jackson even supported the 1836 "Gag Rule" which automatically tabled abolitionist petitions to Congress. . In 1831, Nat Turner's famous Rebellion, one of many slave rebellions of the period, struck

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democrats DBQ

    • 597 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the disparities in the views and actions of the Jacksonian Democrats involved social equality. Jackson repeatedly held sectionalist views and did things that were better for the average, poor community than for the country as a whole. One such example of this is shown in Documents B and C involving the National Bank. In his National Bank veto message in Document B, Jackson says, "It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes." Jackson singles out the wealthier class and accuses them of being selfish. Because this ridiculous comment has no intelligent purpose other than to create an enormous, nationwide class clash, it must be seen as evidence that Jackson was a sectionalist. Daniel Webster responded to this message in Document C by stating, "It manifestly seeks to inflame the poor against the rich … for the purpose of turning against them [the other class] the prejudices and the resentments of the other classes." Daniel Webster is saying what was previously mentioned. It was as though Jackson was trying to anger the poor to turn against the rich. Jackson's actions show that his primary goal was not to help the country, but to address his own personal issues. This completely contrasts the Jacksonian Democrats view of themselves. The Jacksonians thought that they were acting in the best interest of the country, where they were truly thinking about their own needs.…

    • 597 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson was a democratic man by supporting the people’s choices and wanting their voices to be equally heard, however that is not the case throughout his presidency. He is considered “Democratic” because he wanted everyone’s opinions to be heard and equally represented. Democracy can have different meanings, but ultimately they all correspond with each other. A democracy is a government ran by the people through the representatives that were elected. The democracy has a principle of equality between social classes and between individuals. Jackson believed that the rich and powerful people got away with bending the acts of the government to get what they wanted, as shown in document F. He wrote a bank veto message to congress on July 10th, 1832, Jackson is worried that the more than one fourth of the stock is in foreign hands and the rest is in the hands of the richest class citizens. Jackson believes that the rich and powerful people bend the acts of the government to fulfill their selfish needs. Andrew Jackson wants the liberty and independence to be restores in the banks for our country.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson wasn’t just an ordinary president. People had different perspectives over Andrew Jackson. He determined to rescue the will for politics(people). He increased numbers of offices directly elected by the people and restore economic system that protected rights and small producers rather than corporations and the wealthy. He also ignored three decades of government precedent, and a clear court ruling, while implementing a removal policy that displaced over 90,000 people. Was Andrew Jackson a democratic supporter of the people or a tyrant? Did he support democracy or his principles. Or did Andrew Jackson vetoed more bills to become a “a man of people?” Andrew Jackson is a tyrant because he supported the unfair laws, forced indians off their land, and ignored the supreme ruling,refusing of signing laws by the people's representatives law that would improve the country.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Apush

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to the working men’s declaration of independence all men were created equal (doc a) In despite what the declaration said all men were not treated equal in fact poor whites didn’t have the same rights to vote as rich whites , the Jacksonian democracy seem to favor the rich wealthy whites Although they viewed themselves as defenders of all common men, the Jacksonian democrats rejected minorities by only assisting white men. In fact, The Diary of Philip Hone (Doc E) describes the violent uprisings and disturbances that broke out throughout the nation by minorities. Jackson overrode the legislative branch with his bank veto during the removal process he defied the third branch of government “John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it. In court cases such as Cherokee v. Georgia in 1831 and Worcester v. Georgia in 1832 Jackson didn’t uphold the constitutional rule he didn’t let the supreme court handle it he took it append himself to control the final outcome of these court cases. Charters like the constitution should be interpreted strictly he denied that the owners of the bridge had acquired a monopoly when they acquired their charter. The minorities received no aid from the efforts that the Jacksonian democrats made to increase equality, and as a…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the administration of Andrew Jackson, the United States was a nation of change both politically and socially. American society was a society of opportunity. Americans felt that, given a chance, they could make a better life for themselves. This was the era of the common people, the era of democracy. Andrew Jackson appealed to the American people because he stood for values many regarded with favor. However democratic Jackson may seem, he was more tyrant-like than any of his predecessors. His major offerings to the nation included majority rule and a popular presidency, however offered no benefits to women, African Americans, nor Native Americans. Jacksonian Democracy was in no way democratic.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although President Jackson was a champion of democracy and egalitarianism, there are some instances where he takes advantage of his presidential powers and uses him for his own benefits and beliefs and not for the good of the country. President Jackson did a lot of good for the early Democratic Party though. He helped expand voting and focused on destroying monopolies like the national bank that he believed were harming the nation. He did however take manners into his own hands at times. For instance disregarding Supreme Court rulings. Enacting Military action on a state and Vetoing bills like the Maysville road that would’ve helped the union, but since he didn’t approve he vetoed it.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson’s Democratic Party was created with views that favored ‘the people’ rather than the wealthy and elite. Jackson opposed the National Bank since it benefited the wealthy instead of the people. The Jacksonian era helped the suffrage expansion to where all white men can vote rather than just white men who own land. This expansion was one of Jackson’s primary characteristics. Another great idea started in the Jacksonian period was the Spoils System where Jackson rewarded loyal supporters of his party with government jobs. The Jacksonian period had many great features that helped shape the politics of our modern…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson became the president of the United States in 1828 and was the country’s leading democrat. Democracy during this time had not yet embraced all Americans, excluding women, African Americans, and Indians (Keene, 226). Jackson and his supporters desired to limit the rights of blacks by basically stripping them of their suffrage. Many states expanded suffrage for white men by removing property requirements, while others were imposing new constrictions on blacks, such as high property requirements, therefore stripping them of their right to vote. This racial exclusion limited African American votes throughout the North and West in states such as Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, and most all states that entered the Union after 1819 (Keene, 241). Many states such as Indiana, Illinois, and Ohio regulated the conduct of free blacks by requiring those who emigrated in the state to post a bond (much like a prisoner) or be deported, or by prohibiting them from testifying in court or bringing civil suits (Keene,241). Jackson’s contact with Indians, while including them into his vision of white man’s democracy, proved to have extreme consequences as well. Jackson’s vision was to expand the lands of the white settlers’ and it proved to have no room for the respect of Indians’ rights. Jackson and his supporters desired to constrict Indian’s rights, and to take away their lands for the purpose of westward expansion. Although president Jackson treated the natives as inferior subjects to white men as himself, the Cherokees, one of the “Five Civilized Tribes,” chose to obey his wishes and assimilate, rather than to resist. A conflict arose between the Cherokees and the state of Georgia, their white neighbors, over whether the Cherokees could declare themselves an independent nation or not. However,…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mass Democracy

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Andrew Jackson has been referred to as the face of mass democracy, thus why this time period is often referred to as the Jacksonian Era. Jackson was able to win two terms as president by campaigning rather than relying on conventions. Instead of having the people come to him, Jackson went to the people. This switch in campaigning proved beneficial; by 1840 seventy-eight percent of eligible voters cast their vote, a dramatic increase from that in 1820. Jackson proved to be the voice of the common man in many instances by making decisions favorable to his supporters, or the majority. After Jackson’s election he awarded important political offices to those who supported him during his campaigning, called the spoils system. By doing so, Jackson demonstrated that democracy was not a just system, but filled with cronyism like all other…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is truth in this picture painted by Jackson. The road to protesting tradition and changing a long-standing practice may be met with disapproval. History is filled with examples of how people protesting traditions and calling for change were ignored and criticized for a long time before they were successful in accomplishing their goals. Some of such protested practices would include slavery, women’s suffrage, civil rights, and so many…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 4 – THE AGE OF JACKSON Chp. 13-15 & 17 (skip 16) 10/22 – 11/7…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Jefferson

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jackson also helped to change the way our presidential candidates from each party are chosen. He felt that before the change, when they were picked by congressional caucus, it showed favoritism toward the wealthy male because that was the stereotypical image of power back then. In order to make it more fair for the people, Jackson came up with the idea of having political conventions for each party, which is the system that is still in place today. Jackson felt that by doing it this way and holding a convention for the people that the “power would arise directly from the people, not from the aristocratic political institutions such as the caucus.” By using the Spoils System and coming up with holding political conventions it did just as Jackson had hoped and it “did serve to limit the power of the two entrenched elites-permanent officeholders and the exclusive party caucus.”…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Jackson did not uphold the Constitution very well. He went against what the Supreme Court said was unconstitutional and force the Cherokee Nation out of their homeland(Doc g). Going against what the Supreme Court gave a message that President Jackson was prepared to do what he wanted to do, whether it was proven wrong or not. President Jackson also vetoed the U.S. Bank charter which was deemed constitutional in the McCulloch v. Maryland hearing of 1819. President Jackson thought that the bank was a monopoly and thought that the shareholders of the bank used the bank the benefit themselves instead of the nation. This decision angered many people, and in Daniel Webster’s reply to President Jackson’s veto (Doc. C), Webster states “It manifestly seeks to inflame the poor against the rich; it wantonly attacks whole classes of people, for the purpose of turning against them the prejudices and the resentment of other classes.” Webster thought that Jackson’s veto was a way to get the economic classes to clash together. He blames Jackson that he is trying to separate the country. Webster also states that the veto “extends the grasp of executive pretension over every power of the government.” implying that Jackson thinks that he can overpower any form of the government or any…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The largest and most impactful way that Jackson heated up the political atmosphere was by creating the spoils system (Class Notes). The spoils system is still used in the current administration but Jackson fired every single worker almost and filled their occupations with his own supporters. One of the reasons this was highly corrupt was because even if he lost another election he would still have a large amount of power. The other reason was that Jackson could get more support and power for himself since people who wanted a federal job had to support him. One way this is demonstrated is through firing his cabinet members who would not do what he wanted. Jackson went through over 4 secretary of states and even more secretary of the treasury during his term (Class notes). This shows that Jackson was not very good at handling problems with his cabinet in democratic terms, and instead if they caused trouble for him or disagreed he just fired them and found someone else. This is exactly how the royalty worked in Europe, whenever another monarch rose to power and they wanted to seize it themselves they killed or got rid of the monarch of the kingdom somehow. Another way Jackson failed to handle his political party was through Samuel Swartwout who stole a large amount of money from the U.S. government (Document 6). Samuel Swartwout was a supporter of Jackson who…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Essay #1

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In regards to the Jacksonian Democrats guarding the United States Constitution, they had pretty much followed it to a strict interpretation. For example, the Maysville Road Bill in 1830. Jackson had opposed to concentrating power in the federal government or of aristocratic institutions. He had argued that the bill was unconstitutional and because the road had lain within the state of Kentucky, and not, therefore, a part of interstate commerce. Jackson had favored states’ rights and believed that the federal government should not interfere or over step the boundaries of state affairs. However, Jackson was sometimes not always consistent in his strict guardianship of the Constitution. One reason was the Tariff of 1828, also known as the tariff abominations. Angry over the win of John Quincy Adams election in 1824, quite a few of Jackson supporters wanted to embarrass Adams and his administration. The tariff would be for items like manufactured goods. Jacksonians had hoped to get people to think that Adams favored the New England territory over the rest of the nation. Little did Jackson know that in the election of 1828, he did not need to try and…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays