Preview

Active Intellect in Aristotle,

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1058 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Active Intellect in Aristotle,
All men by nature desire to know. An indication of this is the delight we take in our senses; for even apart from their usefulness they are loved for themselves; and above all others the sense of sight". This is the foundation of human knowledge Aristotle presents us with in Book Alpha of the Metaphysics. The next question which we must naturally ask ourselves is, How? How is it that we can have any knowledge at all? We by our very nature desire to know and we love the senses in themselves but what is the relationship between the two and by what faculty are we able to call anything knowledge once sense perception has occurred? Aristotle sets up as his faculty for knowledge both the active and the passive intellects. We begin to have knowledge through sense experience. We cannot know without sense experienceand it is from sense experience that all knowledge is therefore generated. Knowledge for Aristotle is a knowledge of universals, that is, a knowledge of Essences. Thought is thus the faculty by which we come to comprehend universals. And since material objects are a composite unity of essence and existence, it naturally follows that we grasp the universal through our encounter with the particular. What follows is a series of events which leads to knowledge. The passive intellect receives the image from the sense data and it is stamped upon the passive intellect from the material impression. From this stamp the active intellect is to draw out of it and somehow make a universal concept from this particular experience. But there is something more at work here. There is something in the mind ( more specifically in the soul) that somehow comprehends and makes universals intelligible. Various theories have been postulated concerning this but we shall concentrate on Aristotle and leave the other philosophies for now. What is at work in man is a divine reason immanent in man's soul. Somehow man is connected to and shares in divine reason. A distinction

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He was an empiricist. This means that he believed knowledge comes to us through the senses. So knowledge for Aristotle is a posteriori (post experience) not a priori (prior to experience).…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Matrix 2

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the next column, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    our senses are the connection between the world and our mind. a lot of philosophers defined our senses as "the window of the soul". every senses in our brain work hand to hand and build a combined picture of where we are , who we are, and what is going on in our environment, our thinking and sensing are hardly connected and we rely on accurate observations.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also indicates that people who are located in the belief have beliefs but they barely have any knowledge of the things that they believe in. According to Socrates, people in the stage of thought starts to use their knowledge of reasoning. Lastly, people in the understanding level uses their knowledge to figure about the good. Therefore, in Republic, Socrates discuss about knowledge in regard to the hierarchy of cognitive faculties which describes the progress of knowledge in our souls.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle made significantly valiant contributions to the fields of science, philosophy, and ethics, inspiring others to use his finding for future discoveries. With the dedication to resolve previously unsolvable problems, Aristotle questioned ancient discoveries and was well known for his powerful lectures and debates. Being the first to develop a formalized system of reason,…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle Research Paper

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He thought that each thing or event has more than one reason that helps to explain what, why, and where that thing or event is. Greek thinkers from earlier on thought that only one kind of cause could explain itself. Aristotle, on the other hand, said four could. The four causes he spoke of were: material cause, efficient cause, formal cause, and the final cause. For example, he would say that the material cause of a house is the supplies from which it was built. The efficient cause of the house would be the builder. The formal cause would be the shape the builder decided upon. The final cause would be the house's function, to be a home. Aristotle said that something could be understood more when its causes are in specific terms rather than in general ones. Therefore, Aristotle would say that it is more informative to know that a builder built the house rather than to know that it was built by a man. Even further, he would say that it was more informative to know who the builder was rather than just knowing that a builder built…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Title

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the next column, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle believes that you can only truly understand something when you know everything about it. As you learn more about an object you begin to understand it better. For example when looking a picture it is useful to know it was done by an artist, however, it is more useful to know a painter produced it, and even more useful to discover Picasso painted it as opposed to any other painter.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates and Aristotle were both Greek philosophers who contributed philosophies. Socrates believed that all people contained real knowledge within them and that self critical examination was needed to bring this knowledge out. Socrates once stated, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” In this philosophical idea, Socrates is suggesting that an individual, who chooses to not think about their own actions, does not truly care about their own life. Aristotle believed in the concept of examining individual objects and being able to perceive their form and establish universal principles. These principles did not exist as a separate higher world of reality beyond material things, but were apart of things themselves. Aristotle has stated, “Since human reason is the most godlike part of human nature, a life guided by human reason is superior to any other….For man, this is the life of reason, since the faculty of reason is the distinguishing characteristic of human beings.” Aristotle is suggesting that an individual who logically thinks about their actions before acting on them, are more superior than those who act without thinking because thinking before acting causes less harm and it shows a person who cares for both themselves and others. These philosophical ideas about self examination on thoughts and actions have come a long way. All individuals think in new and advanced ways and frequently think about both consequences and benefits before acting upon ideas.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    OUR knowledge is derived from two fundamental sources of the consciousness. The first is the faculty of receptivity…

    • 2045 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    perceptions. Perception is more than sensing; it is processing, reacting, and interpreting. Faith Bryne describes…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle - Biography

    • 2206 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Cited: Adler, Mortimer J. 1978. Aristotle for Everybody: Difficult thought made easy ,New York: Macmillian Publishing Co.…

    • 2206 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When we are trying to understand something, we sometimes rely on our senses and use reason to seek for the truth. We also use intuition to discover unknown things. As environment and culture may affect people’s way of thinking, people from different backgrounds may interpret things differently. People from the same background can even have different personal experiences, which also affect people’s understanding of the surroundings. No two people have exactly the same idea and we try to understand things based on our own ideas. The “things” we are referring to can be objects, scenes, characters or in other forms. Whatever the things are, they will be meaningless without being given any definitions. When we call an object “dehumidifier”, we unconsciously give it the definition of an equipment that absorbs moisture from the atmosphere and makes the air dry. In fact, “dehumidifier” is just a box with calcium chloride granules in it. People regard it as a useful tool in daily life without noticing its components. In this case, we normally do not understand things by their realities, but by the functions as we know them.…

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    All knowledge is human knowledge and if we strip it of all the emotions passions, hopes, etc. which were involved in its creation, it is bound to become dry and meaningless. This realisation seems to have serious implications for materials development and teaching in general.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So, understanding all these possibilities for knowledge that are opened to us by our senses are numerous. Using our senses, we can learn, understand and the most importantly, we perceive how the world around us looks. So senses are a way to "see" our world. This has as a result to learn our world. Using or sense of sight we can understand if something is beautiful or we can see the color that something has. Using our sense of hearing we can understand if we like something using a different way. For example, we can listen to music and we can understand it. But also with this sense we can understand a lot other things. We can listen to music and understand that we are threatened or we can hear a "suspicious" noise and we understand this. With our sense oftouch we can…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays