Preview

235 Exam 2 Spring 2014 Wfor Students 1

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4685 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
235 Exam 2 Spring 2014 Wfor Students 1
235 Exam 2 Spring 2014

True/False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.

____ 1. Punitive damages are intended to punish a wrongdoer and deter others.

____ 2. Self-defense is a defense to an allegation of assault or battery.

____ 3. To commit an intentional tort, one person must intend to harm a certain other person.

____ 4. A party cannot recover damages for severe emotional distress absent a showing of physical injury.

____ 5. Defamation is one person's use of another's name without permission.

____ 6. The public disclosure of private facts about a person is not an invasion of privacy if it is done without the person's knowledge or consent.

____ 7. Fraud occurs only when there is reliance on a statement of opinion.

____ 8. If it can be shown that a trespass to land was warranted, a complete defense exists.

____ 9. If it can be shown that a trespass to personal property was warranted, a complete defense exists.

____ 10. A failure to return personal property is conversion even if the rightful owner consented to the initial taking.

____ 11. Publishing false information about another's product is conversion.

____ 12. If an actor's conduct creates no risk, there is no negligence.

____ 13. To determine whether a duty of care has been breached, a judge asks how he or she would have acted in the same circumstances.

____ 14. Proximate cause exists when the connection between an act and an injury is strong enough to justify imposing liability.

____ 15. An assumption of risk defense does not require that a risk be voluntarily assumed.

____ 16. The doctrine of negligence per se applies if an event causing harm does not normally occur in the absence of negligence.

____ 17. Under the "danger invites rescue" doctrine, a person who tries to rescue another individual from harm is liable for any injuries to the individual.

____ 18. The extreme risk of an activity is a primary basis for imposing strict liability.

____ 19. A criminal case must be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    use of deadly force is subjected to the reasonableness requirement described in the Fourth Therefore, if deadly force is used to prevent the escape of all felony suspects, then…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Defense: Assumption of Risk: “you’ve been warned” Comparative negligence: McDonalds case Contributory negligence: McPhearson: Privity of contract: Not needed. You do not need to buy the fireworks in order to sue if you get hurt by it…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How does an intentional tort differ from negligence? Intentional tort occurs when a person intentionally acts to injure someone or their property. Most times it will not matter if the person committing the act intended for the injury to occur, only that they committed the act intentionally that may have lead to the injury or damages. Example of intentional tort are kidnapping, assault, or spousal abuse.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Farmer V Pilot

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages

    From the Pilot’s perspective, the potential applicable defense privileges that the courts provide to the Defense such that they are not held responsible for their act, are in the form of i) consent, ii) self defense, iii) defense of others (good samaritan) or iv) necessity. Though there are additional defense privileges available under the rule of law, the facts of this case lean towards exploring the said defenses.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the book, the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress can be defined as an extreme and outrageous act, intentionally committed, that results in severe emotional distress to another. To be actionable (capable of serving as the ground for a lawsuit), the conduct must be so extreme and outrageous that it exceeds the bounds of decency accepted by society. Business Law Today, 10th Edition, pg. 99.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    case analysis

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Battery 1) Intent: Description: The defendant has to make an intentional act towards the plaintiff by either a harming or offensive physical act. Have to foresee the results.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opinion. Hug, Circuit Judge. A plaintiff may recoverdamages for emotional distress caused by observing the negligently inflicted injury of a third person if, but only if, said plaintiff: (1) is closely related to the injury victim; (2) is present at the scene of the injury-producing event at the time it occurs and is then aware that it is causing injury to the victim; and (3) as a result suffers serious emotional distress--a reaction beyond that which would be anticipated in a disinterested witness and which is not an abnormal response to the…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kato v.Briney Case Brief

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis The court agrees that a property owner has the right to defend unoccupied property from break-ins, theft, and vandalism. The court does not agree that a property owner has the legal right to use such force that would seriously injure or cause death to an intruder.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    another person or intent to inflict an injury likely to cause death in order to establish…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

     There must be causation. The act must be a substantial factor in bringing about the injury or consequences.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Importance of Donoghue v Stevenson Case The case established 3 things The case established negligence as a wrongful act for which there was a legal liability.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Irac Analysis Case

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The injured person must prove : 1. that statute clearly sets out the standard frame in sense of what conduct is expected, when, where and of whom is expected…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    |reasonable person would exercise AR |219 [actus reus + reckless disregard|bodily harm, OF of death or bodily harm) MR |…

    • 4696 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decision: 1. No, the actions of the railroad guard are not considered an invasion to a legally protected interest or right of the plaintiff. Therefore, it…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilson vs Pringle

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Held - An intention to injure was not an essential ingredient of an action for trespass to the person, since it was the mere trespass by itself which was the offence and therefore it was the act rather than the injury which had to be intentional. However, the intentional act, in the form of an intentional touching or contact in some form, had to be proved to be a hostile touching, and hostility could not be equated with ill-will or malevolence, or governed by the obvious intention shown in acts like punching,…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays