Preview

SCL 1502

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
9087 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
SCL 1502
78

Mental illness or mental defect and criminal responsibility
7 8 (1) A person who commits an act or makes an omission which constitutes an offence and who at the time of such commission or omission suffers from a mental illness or mental defect which makes him or her incapable—
(a)

of appreciating the wrongfulness of his or her act or omission; or

(b)

of acting in accordance with an appreciation of the wrongfulness of his or her act or omission,

shall not be criminally responsible for such act or omission.
[Sub­s. (1) substituted by s. 5 (a) of Act No. 68 of 1998.]
(1A) Every person is presumed not to suffer from a mental illness or mental defect so as not to be criminally responsible in terms of section 78 (1), until the contrary is proved on a balance of probabilities.
[Sub­s. (1A) inserted by s. 5 (b) of Act No. 68 of 1998.]
(1B) Whenever the criminal responsibility of an accused with reference to the commission of an act or an omission which constitutes an offence is in issue, the burden of proof with reference to the criminal responsibility of the accused shall be on the party who raises the issue.
[Sub­s. (1B) inserted by s. 5 (b) of Act No. 68 of 1998.]
(2) If it is alleged at criminal proceedings that the accused is by reason of mental illness or mental defect or for any other reason not criminally responsible for the offence charged, or if it appears to the court at criminal proceedings that the accused might for such a reason not be so responsible, the court shall in the case of an allegation or appearance of mental illness or mental defect, and may, in any other case, direct that the matter be enquired into and be reported on in accordance with the provisions of section 79.
[Sub­s. (2) substituted by s. 5 (c) of Act No. 68 of 1998.]
(3) If the finding contained in the relevant report is the unanimous finding of the persons who under section 79 enquired into the relevant mental condition of the
accused,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch07

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages

    One element that normally must exist for a person to be convicted of a crime is the performance of a prohibited act.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Matrix

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | When a crime is committed against them and they or someone else reports the crime committed against them.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An omission can amount to the Actus Reus of a crime, however, the general rule regarding omissions is that there is no liability for a failure to act. For example if you see a person drowning you have no obligation to help them. This could be seen as a gap in the law therefore it could said that this is a reason that English Criminal law should impose a duty on general citizens to assist a person in peril. Although this is the general rule there are exceptions. The first exception is when there is a statutory duty to act for example stopping at a red light under the Road Traffic Act 1988. Another example is where there is a contractual duty to act. This where it states in a defendants employment contract that they must act. A case example would be in R v Pitwood where the defendant failed to lower the level crossing barrier which resulted in the victim dying. The defendant was found guilty of manslaughter as he had breached his contractual duty. Finally the third exception is when the duty is imposed by law. There are three situations in which this may happen; failing to rectify a dangerous situation as in R v Miller, when there has been a voluntary acceptance of a duty as in Dobinson v Stone and finally misconduct in a public office as in R v…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (1) That the accused did or omitted certain acts or used certain language to or concerning a certain commissioned officer;…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Perjury- the willful giving of false testimony under oath of affirmation, before a competent tribunal, upon a point material to a legal inquiry…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    33. The facts that constitute inadmissibility under sections 34 to 37 include facts arising from omissions and, unless otherwise provided, include facts for which there are reasonable grounds to believe that they have occurred, are occurring or may occur.…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. Mere intentions do not make a criminal offence – there must be a criminal act or omission…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    5.Unexcused delay in presentment or notice of dishonor with respect to a check (discussed earlier in this chapter).…

    • 2939 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Shall observe the law and make disclosures expected by the law and the profession.…

    • 2005 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Actus Reus

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Commission or act of Omission: A person may incur criminal liability for failing to do that which the law requires him to do as much as by doing that which the law prohibits.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Law Omissions

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is impossible to derive from statutes a general rule that a person will not be liable for simply failing to act. This is because, “in contrast to the position at common law, many statutes make it a specific offence to omit to do something”. Omissions are criminalized in both relatively minor offences such as failing to wear a seatbelt, and major offences such as wilfully neglecting a child in a manner likely to cause injury. These examples show that there is no criterion that connects and distinguishes the statutes which criminalize omissions from those which criminalise acts. In fact, as Ashworth notes, clauses describing liability for omissions, rather than acts, have been assigned to legislation somewhat randomly: “it is often a technicality of drafting as to whether an offence is framed in terms of omission or commission”. Some may argue that the fact that there is no common factor linking all statues which impose liability on omissions, is what makes each of them exceptional.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law of Privity in Malaysia

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    6. If necessary, suggest an appropriate remedy for the law in dealing with this matter.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aglipay Vs Ruiz

    • 1320 Words
    • 4 Pages

    a. the writ of prohibition is not the proper legal remedy in the instant case, although he admits that the writ may properly restrain ministerial functions…

    • 1320 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sales

    • 3533 Words
    • 15 Pages

    c) Accidental (w/c may be present or absent in the stipulation e.g. place, time, or…

    • 3533 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    lecture note on civil law

    • 12500 Words
    • 45 Pages

    2. Should forge or counterfeit any coin or currency note of the Philippine Islands or obligations and securities issued by the Government of the Philippine Islands;chan robles virtual law library…

    • 12500 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics