Preview

Jones Electrical Distribution Case Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2408 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jones Electrical Distribution Case Analysis
Jones Electrical Distribution
Case Analysis
Financial Management-Huaihai Cohort- Team 9
This analysis is based on the 5 questions to the case. We believe that answering them builds a rather exhaustive and clear picture of the state of Jones’ business and its strengths and issues and offers a good analysis of its current state.
Question A) How well is “Jones Electrical Distribution” performing? What must Jones do well to succeed?
Jones Electrical Distribution is electrical supplying company. Since it was established in 2004, the sales have been growing steadily on a year to year basis from $1624000 in 2004 to $2224000 in 2006, and furthermore a projected $2.7 million in sales for the current financial year of 2007.In the same time profit has been inadequate for the quantity of sales. This data is backed by the very low Profit Margins experienced by the company, most recently only 1,3% (and only 0.8% for the first quarter of 2007).As of late, the company has faced a cash shortage and the results of that are becoming evident on its financial statements. Accounts payable have increased dramatically comparing 2006 and 2007. The same situation is with accounts receivables, showing that less of Jones’ clients are willing to pay cash for goods delivered. As a result the use of a discount thanks to fast payment to suppliers has become improbable. Further study of the increase in important components such as accounts receivables and inventory will be discussed in the 3rd section of this case analysis.
Here are some vital ratios in analysis the company’s performance:
ROA=NI/Total Assets; ROA=2.3% for 2004, 4.3% for 2005 and 3.8% for 2006, which means what the profit is per dollar of assets and indicates the Jones doesn’t utilize the assets in an efficient manner.
ROE= NI/Total Equity; ROE=7.6% for 2004, 13.62% for 2005 and 12.35% for 2006.
This ratio indicates that for every dollar in equity Jones Electrical Distribution generates 0.07, 0.13 and 0.12 cents in profit for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Sales | 2,269,548 | 1,835,922 | Total Asset | 1,425,308 | 1,121,605 | Total Shareholders Equit | 1,044,226 | 810,873 | Average Total asset | 1986110.5 | | Average total shareholders equity | 1449662.5 | | Interest expenses | -2,945 | -269 | Income before interest and tax | 349,705 | 289,061 | | | | Times interest earned | 117.74 | 1073.57 | ROI | 16.87% | 15.95% |…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cologne Haefren Baum Case

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although the sales of the company have declined significantly their cost of goods sold has remained high, especially between 1994 and 1995 the company had a decline in sales and an increase in cost of goods sold. This is evidence the company is having problems passing costs to its consumers. The company is not very asset intensive and its decrease in total asset turnover can be due to their decrease in sales, however their rather low total asset turnover which is also decreasing from 2.1 to 1.5 shows their assets are not being used very efficiently. As a result of their sales decrease their Fixed Asset turnover also decreased from 7.0 to 5.4. The decrease in sales and increase in competition also means more shelf time for their inventory which has increased from 103 to 129, which makes Haefren Baum’s price cutting strategy questionable. The company is already experiencing a loss of revenue due to their lower prices; however this is not stimulating the number of different sales because the inventory is sitting in the…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tanglewood Case 1

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Based on information in the case, Tanglewood’s Return on Revenue (ROR) shows to be on top after Kohl. When ROR grows it means that there are fewer expenses incurred for higher net income. Tanglewood’s Return on Assets (ROA) is in second place. This means it has efficiently managed its assets to revenue. Tanglewood should show concern of several competitors like Kohl’s, Federated Dept and Target.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    EGT1 Task 3

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The rate of return on total assets is the next ratio. This is calculated by taking net income and adding interest expense; then dividing them by average total assets. This ratio measures a business’s success in using their assets to earn a profit. In 2011, the ratio was 12.30% and in 2012 it was 14.28%. This was a pretty good rise and sits well with the industry averages of 17.20 to 8.60%. I would say this is a strength as well for Company…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Return on assets (ROA) is a measure of profit per dollar of assets” (book 449) The ROA is calculated by dividing the net income by total assets. “The return on equity (ROE) is a measure of how the stockholders fared during the year” (book 449). The ROE is called by dividing the net income by the total equity. In 2016, StilSim’s ROA was 2.1% and ROE was 2.7%. StaffAces ROA was 2.7% and ROE was…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For this assignment I will evaluate different systems in delivering good and services and I will be using SuperGroup to help explain this.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rate of return on assets for Dollar General for 2010 was 6.8% thus for each dollar the company used it earned $0.068. For 2009 ROA was 3.8%, so ROA increased between 2009 and 2010 fiscal years. Profit Margin for ROA is 4.8% for 2010 and for 2009 is 2.9%. We can see an increase in the profit margin for ROA ratio as well. Total Assets turnover ratio for 2010 is 1.4 and for 2009 is 1.3. The increase in ROA in 2010 resulted from increase in profit margin for ROA. Increase in ROA might be result of the decrease in cost of goods sold to sales percentage (numbers are taken from annual report) for almost 1 percent. That might be because Dollar General cut its costs for purchasing merchandise at a lower cost or it more actively sells its private line of products. Another reason might be that the company reduced its sales of home products and apparel and shifted more towards the sales of consumables. We can also see decrease in selling and administrative expenses to sales percentage this might have resulted from the increased demand on cheap products because of the economic situation. The assets turnover ratio might increased due to increase in sales especially the shift to consumables which have a higher turnover in comparison with apparel.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gordon Biersch Case

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. What are the key success factors of Gordon Biersch’s success? Do you have any concerns for the company looking ahead?…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jones Electrical Case

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jones Electrical Distribution (“JED”), which sells electrical components and tools to general contractors and electricians, is experiencing rapid growth in a highly-fragmented, highly competitive industry and despite profits, experiencing a cash shortfall, resulting in increased borrowing from Metropolitan Bank (the “Bank”) to $250K, the max loan amount the Bank will make to any one client. JED has been able to remain within this amount through 2006, relying heavily on trade credit from suppliers. As a result, Nelson Jones, owner and president, is seeking a new banking relationship. Nelson’s friend introduced him to a new bank where he felt he might qualify for a loan up to $350K. The new loan would provide him with the much need credit availability now, but carry customary covenants causing JED to be more deliberate about future growth: (i) continue on aggressive growth path; or (ii) moderate/slow.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1- ROE decomposition 1998,1999 AND 2000. What factors contributed to the differences in Lucent’s performance between those quarters?…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Based on the table 1, it shows that the financial ratio was divided into four parts which are liquidity, assets management, long-term debt paying ability and profitability. Liquidity ratios are particularly interesting to short-term creditors and it is focus on current assets and current liability. In addition, General Thumb of rule for the current ratio should be at least 2:1. For the Gemini Electronic the current ratio is consistent and it is increase in year 2006. But we note that Gemini Electronics is slightly less liquid than the average firm in the industry because the current ratio is lower than the industry average. Both fixed assets turnover and total asset turnover are less than industry average, indicating that Gemini Electronics is using its asset inefficiently than the industry average in generating sales.In term of collects receivable Gemini Electronics was becoming slow during year 2009. One of the causes is many retailers demanded more generous credit terms than net 30, which standard in the industry. Besides that, interest was also not charged on overdue account.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Q3) Conduct an analysis of Williams’ sources and uses of funds during the first half of 2002. How do you expect these numbers to evolve over the second half of 2002? What is the problem facing Williams? How did it get into this situation? How has it tried to address the problem it is facing?…

    • 2088 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Accounting Paper

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The first ratio that we found was Return on Assets or ROA. ROA is computed by taking net income and dividing it by average total assets. This is an indicator of how profitable a company is with regards to their assets. It gives an idea into how efficient management is using their assets to generate earnings. Over the two years that we looked into Home Depot’s ROA rose by 1.2%. This rising trend is a result of good use of their assets in 2010 and they were able to generate more revenue than in 2009. On the other hand Lowe’s ROA went down by 1.48% over the course of the two years. They were not able to generate as much revenues in fiscal year 2010 as 2009 and therefore there ROA suffered. Even though Lowe’s ROA went down, its average ROA over the…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    | 114.9+45.4*0.77455.6=1.97% | 558.7+47.9*0.77072.5=8.37% | 356.1+38.1*0.76610.7=5.79% | Asset Turnover | 7455.6(14738.4+9695.7)/2=0.61 times | 7072.5(9695.7+8690.9)/2=0.77 times | 6610.7(8690.9 +9034.7)/2=0.75 times | ROE | 114.9(7132.9+6341.5)/2=1.71% | 558.7(6341.5+5799.9)/2=9.20% | 356.1(5799.9+5845.7)/2=6.12% | Net Profit Margin | 114.97455.6=1.54% | 558.77072.5=7.9% | 356.16610.7=5.39% |…

    • 1350 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ACC 501 Case 3

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The return on Assets is defined by Investopedia as “An indicator of how profitable a company is relative to its total assets. ROA gives an idea as to how efficient management is at using its assets to generate earnings. Calculated by dividing a company's annual earnings by its total assets, ROA is displayed as a percentage. Sometimes this is referred to as "return on investment".…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays