Case Study on Carl Robins Carolyn Joel COMM/215 July 28‚ 2014 Dr. Yolanda Orizando-Harding Case Study on Carl Robins BACKGROUND INTRODUCTION This case study pertains to an employee by the name of Carl Robins. He has been employed by ABC‚ Inc as a Campus Recruiter for six months. In early April‚ during Mr. Robins first six months of employment; he successfully recruited 15 new hires. The new trainees were to report to Monica Carrolls‚ the Operations Supervisor‚ as they would be working
Premium Employment Case study Drug test
Case Brief: Zuckerman v. Antenucci Sophia Haberman LAW/531 December 01‚ 2010 Dr. Maurice Rosano Case Study: Zuckerman v. Antenucci Partnership liability tort can take place when a partner or all partners acting on partnership business causes injury to a third person. Cause of this tort could be a negligent act‚ a breach of trust‚ breach of fiduciary duty‚ defamation‚ fraud‚ or another intentional tort (Cheeseman‚ 2010‚ p. 538). Under the Uniform Partnership Act‚ partners are jointly
Premium Partnership Tort law Tort
Law Case Analysis According to the law case EEOC v. FREEMAN‚ the EEOC filed a law suit against Freeman and alleged the company’s hiring policy which includes criminal background and credit history checks‚ has a disparate impact on African-American‚ Hispanic‚ and male applicants. And the material fact of this case is whether Defendant’s hiring criteria of conducting criminal background and credit history checks is consistent with business necessity. Since the Defendant was charged by the EEOC with
Premium Law Employment United States
two court cases were being held in the supreme court about cruel and unusual punishment. Ingraham Vs. Wright (1977) and Gregg Vs. Georgia (1976). I choose to compare these because they both favored common good instead of individual rights and had a lot of similar aspects of their trials. During these Supreme Court cases Gregg Vs. Georgia showed more balance between the promoting the common good and protecting the individual rights than Ingraham Vs. Wright showed in 1977. In the court case of Ingraham
Premium Capital punishment Murder Supreme Court of the United States
Midland Energy/Sample 2 Midland Energy Resources‚ Inc. Midland Energy Resources‚ Inc. is a global energy company that operates in oil and gas exploration and production (E&P)‚ refining and marketing (R&M)‚ and petrochemicals. Midland’s most profitable segment is its E&P division which produces 67% of the company’s net income (Exhibit 3). Its largest division is R&M with the Petrochemical division being the smallest. The primary goals of Midland’s financial strategy are to fund substantial overseas
Premium Finance Weighted average cost of capital Capital
Marketing Branding Elements of The Advertising Creative Brief: I. Project name: Bringing the Preppy Khakis style back to GAP Inc. II. What is the purpose of this creative? The launch of the Americana khakis for the young professional‚ in other to reconnect with the identity of what GAP Inc. comfortable‚ stylish‚ quality‚ strong American brand. III. Description of product or service. Gap Inc. and its preppy khakis feel more comfortable‚ lightweight‚ wrinkle worry free‚ excellent
Premium Brand Advertising Brand management
Case 1-1 E-Centives‚ Inc.—Raising Capital in Switzerland 1. Possible factors (from Exhibit 1-7) relevant in e-centives decision to raise capital and list on the Swiss Exchange s New Market: a. Ease of raising capital (point 3). The Swiss Exchange s New Market has simple listing requirements designed to appeal to small companies. The contrast with the complex‚ detailed listing and reporting requirements in the United States is striking. b. Availability of capital (point
Premium Finance Stock exchange Financial statements
Case1 Plaintiff(14) VS Defendant(11) February 20th 1889 Fact: Two boys were in a same high school of the village of Waukesha.11 years old boy kicked another 14 years old boy which caused the boy never recovered the use of his limb. The former was sued by the latter for $2800. Issue: whether a person who unintentionally hurt another person is liable for the harm through intentional harm. Holdings: the jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff of $2800. Rationale: the touch was the
Premium Contract
undoubtedly fail in general. This phrase was made evident to me in this case study analysis. In the case study of Carl Robins a number of problems related with the recruiting process happened. To get a clear understanding of what didn’t work and the best way to solve these problems‚ a case study analysis is the most effective method to identify and recommend ways to improve this process for recruiting new trainees for ABC‚ Inc. Carl’s mishaps were caused by a lack of organization‚ planning‚ and scheduling
Premium Management Failure English-language films
Running head: CARL ROBBINS CASE STUDY Carl Robbins Case Study Casey Higgins University of Phoenix Essentials of College Writing COMM 215 Nalin Pant June 1‚ 2009 At the start of April‚ Carl Robbins was hired at ABC‚ INC. as a new recruiter; He eventually hired many employees‚ even though he was fairly new at his job. This was his first recruitment effort that turned out quite well. After this‚ the Operations Supervisor‚ Monica Carrolls‚ tasked Carl to recruit 15 new employees to begin
Premium Employment Task