Anita Groener‚ who is suing Minister for Education (hereinafter referred as ‘the Minister’) and the City of Dublin - Vocational Educational Committee (hereinafter referred as ‘the Education Committee’). The charge was based on the free movement of workers‚ more specific‚ knowledge of an official language of the host country. Mrs. Groener was a Netherlands’ national‚ who wanted to work as a full-time art teacher. The origin of the dispute was the Minister’s refusal to appoint Mrs. Groener to a
Premium Discrimination Republic of Ireland Irish language
The educational system. If I were the minister of education I would most probably last not more than a day or two‚ because of two main reasons. The first one is that I would honestly like to bring a change to the content of the educational system. The second main reason is that‚ recently‚ most ministers of educations that have successively occupied this position have not lasted too long‚ fortunately or not. The educational system is facing numerous problems today. The main one is that in 20 years
Free Education Teacher Student
2011 To his Excellency the minister of education Dear minister‚ As the minister of education I am aware that your input has been involved in the decision towards raising university fees. This controversial decision has upset many students‚ as the ridiculous change which involves fees of up to 25 thousand dollars a year‚ will result in negative consequences for all of us. As a student of 16 years of age studying at Mont La Salle my aspiration is to develop my education further to degree level at
Premium Term Time University
Minister of Posts and Telegraphs v Rasool AD Facts: On the 29th of December 1931‚ the Postmaster- General instructed his subordinates to divide the Pietersburg Post Office into two new portions‚ the one for the service of ‘Europeans Only’ and the other for the service of ‘Non-Europeans’. Prior to these instructions Mr. Rasool‚ an Indian‚ was allowed to use the ‘European’ counter. Consequently‚ after these instructions Mr. Rasool was obliged to use the ‘Non-European’ counter. Mr Rasool objected
Premium Racial segregation Law Racism
CCSU v Minister for Civil Service 1985 (HOL) Facts - GCHQ: branch of public service (public function) - 1984 GCHQ staff not permitted to belong to national trade unions Issues Whether the oral instruction (exercise of royal prerogative) by PM is valid? A: Invalid - PM did not consult staffs prior to exercise of power‚ so this was a failure in procedural obligation. Whether Courts have power to review instruction on the ground of procedural irregularity: (a) power exercised was royal
Premium Law Appeal Court
Prime Minister and Council of Ministers - India Serial Number 1 Portfolio Prime Minister and also In-Charge of the Ministries/Departments viz: Ministry of Personnel‚ Public Grievances and Pensions Ministry of Planning Ministry of Water Resources Department of Atomic Energy Department of Space Name of Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Minister of Finance Shri Pranab Mukherjee Minister of Agriculture and Minister of Consumer Shri Sharad
Premium Manmohan Singh
Council of Ministers The Council of Ministers also known as the Council of the European Union is the most powerful institution within the history of the European Union. The Council of Ministers has retained and increased its power throughout the treaties in the EU. The Council of Ministers is usually referred to as “the Council”. It is the EU’s main decision making and law-making body‚ and works in partner with the EU parliament to form the EU’s governing body. The council of minsters is
Premium Council of the European Union European Union European Parliament
The court went in favor of the majority and held the IDF accountable and guilty (Miller v. Minister of Defence 1995). Alice Miller was able to take courses‚ but unfortunately‚ she couldn’t get into aviation because she failed the exam (Barak-Erez 2007). This case was important because it opened the doors for the equality debate that resulted into
Premium Judaism Israel Defense Forces Israel
Brown v. Board of Education Ronald Still Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Brown v. Board of Education Background The Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education dates back to 1954‚ the case was centered on the Fourteenth Amendment and challenged the segregation of schools solely on the basis of race. The Brown case was not the only case of its time involving school segregation‚ the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was leading the push to desegregate
Premium Brown v. Board of Education Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Race & The Law Final paper Brown v Board of Education is a historical landmark case that dismantled segregation laws and established a great milestone in the movement toward true equality. The Supreme Courts unanimously decided on Brown v. Board of Education that "separate but equal is inherently unequal." Ruling that no state had the power to pass a law that deprived anyone from his or her 14th amendment rights. For my historical analysis I will use Richard Kluger’s “Simple Justice”‚ in
Premium Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States Brown v. Board of Education