The duties and responsibilities that define the role of a Sonographer are: Checking ‚taking and bringing together pertinent patient medical history‚ information from physical examinations and supporting clinical data to facilitate diagnosis. Preparing the patient(s) for the Ultrasound examination. Briefly explaining the examination to the patient and answering questions about the examimation. Making sure to respect and follow the privacy of confidentiality act. Electing the appropriate
Premium
Based on the facts above‚ Bex and Walton believe that the totality of the evidence would show that there was a preponderance of evidence tending to show that defendant was indeed negligent‚ for at least two reasons: 1) the burden of evidence ended with defendant‚ who failed to satisfy it; and 2) the greater weight of testimonies and object evidence supports the explanation provided by the plaintiff. Judging by preponderance of evidence‚ the defendant would be found liable. If it were judged by clear
Premium Law Tort Tort law
DEFENCES TO NEGLIGENCE Up to the D to prove that the P’s also did not exercise the same reasonable standard of care for the community CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE * Contributory negligence involves a failure by the P to take reasonable care for his or her own safety that contributes to his or her damage * Apply section 5R – need to show that the P failed to take reasonable care for his or her safety or for the protection of the P’s interest * It is an objective standard that
Premium Tort law Law Duty of care
Professional Negligence In relation to professional negligence the concept of the reasonable man becomes that of the reasonable professional. The reasonable man will normally lack the skill and expertise acquired by the professional. These professional men and women are not only required to take reasonable care but also to measure up to the standard of competency that can be expected from such professionals-that is the standard of‚ for example the reasonable nurse or the reasonable solicitor
Premium Law Tort Duty of care
The Sally Smith’s and Larry Landlord The issue is whether did Larry Landlord fall below the standard of care by not maintaining the fire alarm in the hallway properly causing the severe injury of Sally Smith? I believe Larry Landlord fell below the standard of care in this case. To the reasons set forth below: According the rule of reasonable person under the standard of care‚ I can definitely foresee the injury coming. Her injury could have prevented if the landlord has maintained the fire alarm
Premium Tort Reasonable person Standard of care
Employer’s Duty of Care Jerry Sutherland Instructor Dr. Smith LEG500 2/13/11 Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment.”? Jake actions are in the scope of his employment‚ he has been promoted to the service manager position. If the other service techs are busy or can not keep up he is qualified to jump in and help out. The only question of his position I have is how many employees Jake has below him. If he has no employees
Premium Employment Law
progress in construction industry and techniques‚ what other tasks would you propose to be included to the existing list to demonstrate the potentials and expand the services of the quantity surveyor. Tips: Highlight the key points Identify duties/ roles/ responsibilities/ obligations/ steps to be taken in each case – as a QS Relate to reasonable standard of skill and care Relate to expected standard (if below expected standard may cause negligence) Cite relevant cases A Quantity
Premium Construction Costs
November 30‚ 2011 Aids – The Duty to Warn The AIDS epidemic began in the early to mid-1980’s and since it’s recognition in America it has become a very heated and debated topic among health professionals‚ the gay community‚ and most of all for the ones that are carrying the virus. The real debate is not over the virus itself but‚ rather about the infected individuals and whether or not they should be made morally obligated to tell their sexual partners if they are in fact infected. Both sides
Premium HIV Sexual intercourse Human sexual behavior
A Business Ethical Duty: Social Responsibility Joe McClendon Western Governors University A community business has a social responsibility to its local community‚ its employees have an ethical duty their employer‚ and management has business responsibility to act in the best interest of stakeholders. Company Q is a small local grocery store chain located in a major metropolitan area. The company is struggling internally with ethical integrity and social responsibility. Company Q’s ethical
Premium Social responsibility Applied ethics Sociological terms
order or a regulation. Failure to Report falls into this article simple because the order is given by a senior ranking individual. This can be done orally‚ which is most common‚ and verbally‚ such as a training schedule. By not reporting for duty or accountability you are in direct violation of Article 92 and can receive a summarized‚ company‚ or field grade article 15. This will depend on how many offenses you have in the past‚ your work ethic and the reason you failed to report. Given
Premium Non-commissioned officer United States United States Army