clearly seen above there was a lot of human error or possibly calculation error. The year 1991 should be disregarded and years with 0 densities were due to not having that penny year tested. Part 3: 1.) Avg Density of Pennies from 1975-79: 10.7 g/ml 1995-1999: 7.0 g/ml 8.94(.95) + x(.5) = 10.7 g/ml x(.975) + 8.94(.025) = 7.0 .5x = 2.207 g/ml .975x = 6.77 x = 4.414 g/ml x = 6.95 g/ml Based off of the density calculation for the years 1995-1999 it is clear that the unknown metal that
Premium Density Mathematics Volume
calculated with the WACC formula. (The calculation of the WACC formula is done in question 3) In this case we would choose a time horizon from 10 years‚ regarding to the data quality and the uncertainty of the evolution of Midland Energy Resources future cash flows. In addition the time horizon of the cash flow estimation should be equal to the used maturity of the risk free rate in the WACC calculation. Midland Energy Resources will repurchase shares if the calculation explained above shows that the intrinsic
Premium Stock market Stock
only be estimated. I do not entirely agree with Joanna Cohen’s WACC calculation. I believe she made the following mistakes: 1. She is wrong to use book values in debt and equity weights calculations. WACC is market driven. It is the expected rate of return that the market requires to commit capital to an investment. Therefore‚ the base against which the WACC is measured is market value‚ not book value. 2. In calculations of the cost of debt she used historical data. She divided the interest
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Investment Stock market
reported results showed that the spin densities at the center of the molecule from the pure functionals of PBEPBE were underestimated. Based on the comparison made‚ it was concluded that among the methods considered‚ the suitable one for use in the calculations of pristine graphene was B3LYP. Keywords: Density functional theory; grapheme; Hartree-Fock; Møller-Plesset perturbation theory; spin contamination ABSTRAK Kesan pelumusan spin ke atas kestabilan dan ketumpatan spin di dalam fungsi gelombang
Premium Quantum mechanics
Analysis – Following the directions in the assignment‚ clearly write up your problem analysis in this section. In order to write this program‚ two variables‚ ROWNUM and COLUMNNUM‚ will be used with nested repetition loop to complete the necessary calculations. ROWNUM will be used in an outerloop and contain numbers between1-10 and COLUMNNUM will be used in an innerloop and contain numbers between 1-10. For each iteration of the outerloop‚ the inner loop will be executed 10 times and the product of ROWNUM*COLUMNNUM
Premium Harshad number
portfolios. Methodologies The completed analysis of Coca Cola’s investment potential required the use of a few calculations to gather enough information regarding the selling price of its stock. The first of these calculations used is the Capital Asset Pricing Model (Exhibit 1). This model was used to calculate the required rate of return for an investor in Coca Cola. In this calculation‚ Beta was set at 1.24‚ and the risk free rate was set at the 30-year government bond rate of 6.22%. The market
Premium P/E ratio Dividend yield Time value of money
rate compounded semiannually is 10.25%. Calculations: (1+.10/2)^2 -1 =.1025 The future value of a $10‚000 dollar CD compounded semiannually for one year at The First National Bank is $11‚025 Calculations: FV=$10‚000(1.1025) FV=$11‚025 D. Using a 360 day bankers year‚ the Effective Annual Rate of Pacific Trust’s 10% interest CD compounded daily is 10.52% Calculations: (1+.10/365)^365 –1 =.1052 The future
Premium Compound interest Time value of money
Resources was fortunate enough to have a skilled financial manager in Mortensen. Her expertise had come to be respected as was evidenced by her promotion and the reliance on her calculations. However‚ her cost of equity numbers were used as a starting point and manipulated rather than used as presented. Examining the calculation of the firms weighted average cost of capital and betas as well as comparing with others in the same type of industries indicates that assumptions should be changed for the
Premium Weighted average cost of capital
explain our answers. 1. Find the contribution margin per haircut. Assume that the barbers’ compensation is a fixed cost. Show calculations to support your answer. Given the information provided in the above scenario I was able to calculate the Contribution Margin using the following formula (CM=sales price per cut (minus) Total variable costs per cut. Based upon this calculation the CM is $.40 (price of shampoo). This is deducted because this is the only variable that is affected when the number of
Premium Variable cost Costs Management accounting
about the lab using the following sections: Intent: State the reasons why the lab was done. (The goal was to verify a physical law‚ or to determine a constant‚ etc) Results: State or show the result and the margin of error. No calculations are shown here‚ only the final result is reported. For multiple results a table is a good way to organize them. The actual lab report begins here: 3. Theory This section contains a brief description of the theory and equations used
Premium Mathematics Error